This removes our re-implementation of binary search and uses the STL
version. The main change is to remove strcmp-like comparison functions
and replace them with binary "less than" predicates.
I also include wrappers for lower_bound and upper_bound. I use these in
my working copy, but that patch i
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 08:10 +0200, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2006 02:25, Joe Neeman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 15:08 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > Joe Neeman wrote:
> > > By "the absence of notes", do you mean "{r | R | s} in all parts", or do
> > > you mean "{s} i
On Thursday 07 September 2006 02:25, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 15:08 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Joe Neeman wrote:
> > By "the absence of notes", do you mean "{r | R | s} in all parts", or do
> > you mean "{s} in all parts" ? That "does not scan for rests" is a bit
> > confus
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 15:08 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> Joe Neeman wrote:
> > +If this is too tedious, you can add a @code{Page_turn_engraver} to a Staff
> > or
> > +Voice context. The @code{Page_turn_engraver} will scan the context for
> > +sections without notes (note that it does not scan f
I've added a bunch of bug reports to the tracker. Is this format ok? I
thought I should check before doing another two hours of work.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lily
> Unfortunately I couldn't find any more info about "brew-ez-stencil" --
> even grepping the source didn't turn up anything useful. (?!)
Try looking at brew_ez_stencil in lily/easy-notation.cc. The relevant
block is as follows:
SCM idx = scm_from_int (pit->get_notename ());
SCM names = me->
Interesting question! Unfortunately I couldn't figure out how
\setEasyHeads decides what text to print. ly/property-init.ly contains
setEasyHeads = \sequential {
\override NoteHead #'stencil = #ly:note-head::brew-ez-stencil
\override NoteHead #'font-size = #-7
\override NoteHead #'font-f
This is good info; does anybody want to submit changes to the manual?
It would be good if it were a "normal user" who suggested the changes.
http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/documentation-adding
- Graham
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Some further clarifications below.
Quoting Erik Sandbe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb:
Note that we create the installer on Linux, and almost never test the
windows installer.
That is bad. I'm impressed about Lilypond's quality in design,
especially its fantastic documentation so that I'm surprized that you
don't test it on Windows.
Joe Neeman wrote:
I figured the new page breaking stuff might be more useful if people had
some idea of how to use it. Writing documentation is not something I've
had much practice with, so please point out any problems
Looks fairly good; I've made a few comments below, but once those are
fixe
Quoting Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ml.lilypond.devel:
:Why don't you use the Linux package available for download at
:www.lilypond.org? It should work without any problems on a Debian
:machine, for example.
Sure, it works. But I want to be able to recompile lilypond myself,
otherwi
except with a qualification? Is it one of the two contrary poles ofcomes-to-be will have to come-to-be out of nothing. Although we haveOur solution must preserve intact the three characteristics of
PLATINWAY Corp
Ist das Ihr alter Traum ein hochbezahlter Manager einer
Why don't you use the Linux package available for download at
www.lilypond.org? It should work without any problems on a Debian
machine, for example.
As far as I can see from the Debian package database, the file
usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-39.scm should be included in the
libs/guile-1.6-lib
Here's the error I'm getting:
--
Parsing...[/home/ram/tmp/music/lilypond-2.8.6/out/share/lilypond/current/ly/init.ly[/home/ram/tmp/music/lilypond-2.8.6/out/share/lilypond/current/ly/declarations-init.ly[/home/ram/tmp/music/lilypond-2.8.6/out/share/lilypond/current/ly/music-function
14 matches
Mail list logo
