Re: broken pngs in output-distance.py

Joe Neeman escreveu: > > > On 1/26/07, *Han-Wen Nienhuys* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Joe Neeman escreveu: > > After running output-distance.py, none of the pngs are displayed. The > > links in index.html point to, for example, > > > reference-

Re: skyline vs. y-aligned-side

Hi, On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Joe Neeman escreveu: > > I think it's just in my local copy so far (I haven't pushed for a while > > because I was having a very strange problem with "make web") but I'm not > > at my computer so I can't check. By the way, I accidentally did this

Re: skyline vs. y-aligned-side

Joe Neeman escreveu: > I think it's just in my local copy so far (I haven't pushed for a while > because I was having a very strange problem with "make web") but I'm not > at my computer so I can't check. By the way, I accidentally did this > particular commit without a commit message. Is there a w

Re: test coverage

On 1/26/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Neeman escreveu: > > I have all the page-breaking files with coverage around 90% now, but > I'll try to improve it a bit more (btw, the reason > page-turn-page-breaking.cc was so low is that I forgot to put a \book > around the regressi

Re: broken pngs in output-distance.py

On 1/26/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Neeman escreveu: > After running output-distance.py, none of the pngs are displayed. The > links in index.html point to, for example, > reference-lilypond/input/mutopia/W.A.Mozart/out-www/mozart- hrn-3-page1.png > while the png image is

Re: skyline vs. y-aligned-side

On 1/26/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe Neeman escreveu: > There are certainly places where that code can be simplified -- I've > even made some changes already in my working copy. There's a bunch of (tried to check the jneeman branch on sv.gnu.org, but I couldn't see anythi

Re: test coverage

Joe Neeman escreveu: > > I have all the page-breaking files with coverage around 90% now, but > I'll try to improve it a bit more (btw, the reason > page-turn-page-breaking.cc was so low is that I forgot to put a \book > around the regression tests so the lilypond-book output skipped the > page-br

Re: Patch for new harmonic glyph

Maximilian Albert escreveu: > Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > >>> I also added a glyph called "s1harmonic" which [...] in a way "closes >>> the gap" between "s0" and "s2". [...] Agree? >> No, this should be handled by the code in output-lib. That code's sole >> purpose >> is to fill all the gaps in the

Re: skyline vs. y-aligned-side

Joe Neeman escreveu: > There are certainly places where that code can be simplified -- I've > even made some changes already in my working copy. There's a bunch of (tried to check the jneeman branch on sv.gnu.org, but I couldn't see anything interesting.) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: broken pngs in output-distance.py

Joe Neeman escreveu: > After running output-distance.py, none of the pngs are displayed. The > links in index.html point to, for example, > reference-lilypond/input/mutopia/W.A.Mozart/out-www/mozart-hrn-3-page1.png > while the png image is in > reference-lilypond/out-www/offline-root/input/mutopia/

compilation error of GIT 2007-01-26 3:56

Processing `/home/wl/git/lilypond.compiled/ly/generate-documentation.ly' [...] error: define-grob-properties.scm: cannot find interface for property: arrow Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman

Re: broken lyric example

It seems to work again with the latest bug fixes in GIT. Of course you can have multiple lyrics to the same voice context, that's normal procedure as soon as you have more than a single verse in your song. /Mats Graham Percival wrote: Could somebody check why this doesn't compile in 2.11.13 ?

Re: proofreading tutorial

Such an overview of different editors, should of course also mention the simple text editors included in the LilyPond distribution for Mac and Windows. /Mats Graham Percival wrote: Bertalan Fodor wrote: Ok, I'm happy to do this. But what should I write about emacs, vim etc? Should I write

Re: Proposed Doc Changes in Polyphonic music

I hope you are aware of the fact that the only difference between \voiceOne and \voiceThree is that the latter includes a \shiftOn. Similararly for \voiceTwo versus \voiceFour. Therefore, two other methods to get the same result as your second measure is << {d=''2 \voiceThree g2 } \\ {\on