Arjan Bos wrote:
Ah, Indeed it appears that I have an outdated version of the lilypond
script in my ~/bin.
Does this mean that lilycall.py is obsolete?
Umm... maybe? Try it in 2.11; if it's still useful there, then
obviously we're keeping it.
If so, then please remove
it, or replace it wi
file from CVS not distributed: lilypond-2.11.20/Documentation/TRANSLATION
please fix.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hi, all!
Just a few comments:
Actually, binding the origin to a staff line (e.g. the most lower staff
line) rather than to the center of the origin (as we currently do) would
solve the current problem that you have to design clefs explicitly either
for staves with an even number of staff line
As far as I can see there is no strict need, fot it to be zero, so if
you have a sensible patch to change it, go ahead and post it.
BTW I know that you have an interesting patch for Lily to make line
configurations more flexible. I'll try to review it this week.
regards,
Han-Wen
2007/3/15, K
