Re: Strange (buggy) Scheme assignment

2008-01-23 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Ok, thanks, should I create patches for these cases - there are some in the declarations? Anyway I wonder how guile could accept these. Bert > --- Original Message --- > From: Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Bertalan Fodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 08/01/23/, 21:45:25 > Subjec

Re: Strange (buggy) Scheme assignment

2008-01-23 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Le 23 janv. 08 à 21:08, Bertalan Fodor a écrit : Yes, it's a vector, but is it a standalone expression? The guile page says: Like lists, vectors have to be quoted: '#(a b c) => #(a b c) Indeed, my mistake. The examples later on the guile documentation use quoted sharp-paren expressions.

Re: Strange (buggy) Scheme assignment

2008-01-23 Thread Bertalan Fodor
Yes, it's a vector, but is it a standalone expression? The guile page says: Like lists, vectors have to be quoted: '#(a b c) => #(a b c) > --- Original Message --- > From: Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 08/01/23/, 2

Re: Strange (buggy) Scheme assignment

2008-01-23 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Le 23 janv. 08 à 16:26, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) a écrit : Hi, in property-init.ly I found this: aikenHeads = \set shapeNoteStyles = ##(do re mi fa #f la ti) That seems to be a vector definition in Scheme: #(do re mi fa #f la ti) However, it is not a valid Scheme expression, at least

Strange (buggy) Scheme assignment

2008-01-23 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
Hi, in property-init.ly I found this: aikenHeads = \set shapeNoteStyles = ##(do re mi fa #f la ti) That seems to be a vector definition in Scheme: #(do re mi fa #f la ti) However, it is not a valid Scheme expression, at least according to its formal grammar and the online Scheme interpreter,