Re: \times -> \tuplet

2008-01-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > I favour a convert-ly rule. Why not? > > If we "officially" allow the old \times command as an alias, then > people who want to keep on using the \times rule will be pissed > when convert-ly automatically changes their 500 .ly files. Hmm. Then I favour not an official alias, but \times as d

Re: \times -> \tuplet

2008-01-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
2008/1/27, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I am still very much opposed to this as a mandatory change. Aliasing > > > times to tuplet would be great. > > > > Yes. > > Would this aliasing include a convert-ly rule, or not? That's > going to be impossible to resolve. > > > > \times syntax

Re: Postponed Bugs #83 and #297: "a Someone Else Problem"

2008-01-27 Thread Juergen Reuter
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Juergen (CC-d) is the person who wrote the ligature code, including the one for the brackets. Yepp, ages ago (around early 2002)... I'm looking at the issues now, but there is something I don't understand. The ligature events are implemented

Re: \times -> \tuplet

2008-01-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:57:55 +0100 Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graham Percival skrev: > > OTOH, those people are probably more technically inclined than > > those who will move to the new \tuplet command, so they can write > > their own python script to change all the new \tuplet bac

Re: \times -> \tuplet

2008-01-27 Thread Rune Zedeler
Graham Percival skrev: OTOH, those people are probably more technically inclined than those who will move to the new \tuplet command, so they can write their own python script to change all the new \tuplet back into \times. We could even add that script to LSR... IMO the nice way to do this wo

Re: \times -> \tuplet

2008-01-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:31:53 +0100 (CET) Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Would this aliasing include a convert-ly rule, or not? That's > > going to be impossible to resolve. > > I favour a convert-ly rule. Why not? If we "officially" allow the old \times command as an alias, t

Re: \times -> \tuplet

2008-01-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Would this aliasing include a convert-ly rule, or not? That's > going to be impossible to resolve. I favour a convert-ly rule. Why not? Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilyp

Re: Postponed Bugs #83 and #297: "a Someone Else Problem"

2008-01-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Juergen (CC-d) is the person who wrote the ligature code, including the one for the brackets. I'm looking at the issues now, but there is something I don't understand. The ligature events are implemented as 'command-event', like \bar and \time, which fall in between the notes.This is inconsis

Re: \times -> \tuplet

2008-01-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:58:21 +0100 (CET) Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There has already been a *huge* thread on the -user list about > > > this, and the conclusion was that the only realistic change we > > > could do was renaming \times to \tuplet, and nothing else; > > > I am

Re: version in commit 3b7d631201dca7902620d79e83b7e37141040af3

2008-01-27 Thread Graham Percival
Thanks, fixed. Cheers, - Graham On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:04:04 +0100 Wilbert Berendsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > diff --git a/ly/property-init.ly b/ly/property-init.ly > > -\version "2.10.0" > +\version "2.7.38" > > shouldn't that be 2.11.38 ? > > w best regards, > Wilbert Berendsen > > --

Re: \times -> \tuplet

2008-01-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > There has already been a *huge* thread on the -user list about > > this, and the conclusion was that the only realistic change we > > could do was renaming \times to \tuplet, and nothing else; Yes; even if it's mathematical nonsense, the nominator/denominator order shouldn't change. > I am st

Re: \times -> \tuplet (was Re: Issue 566 in lilypond: showStaffSwitch -> \staffSwitchOn)

2008-01-27 Thread Bryan Stanbridge
John Mandereau wrote: There has already been a *huge* thread on the -user list about this, and the conclusion was that the only realistic change we could do was renaming \times to \tuplet, and nothing else; the point of my remark in the bug tracker was to ask developers' opinion about actually do

version in commit 3b7d631201dca7902620d79e83b7e37141040af3

2008-01-27 Thread Wilbert Berendsen
diff --git a/ly/property-init.ly b/ly/property-init.ly -\version "2.10.0" +\version "2.7.38" shouldn't that be 2.11.38 ? w best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/ "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Gandi __

Postponed Bugs #83 and #297: "a Someone Else Problem"

2008-01-27 Thread Robert Memering
Dear Lilypond developers, I am preparing some sophisticated scores of renaissance vocal music and I am severely affected by the problems with ligature brackets described in issue #83 and #297 of the bug tracker. (I can send examples much uglier than in the bug tracker if anyone is interested.) I

\times -> \tuplet (was Re: Issue 566 in lilypond: showStaffSwitch -> \staffSwitchOn)

2008-01-27 Thread John Mandereau
[moved from bug-lilypond to -devel] Le dimanche 27 janvier 2008 à 13:17 +0100, Hans Aberg a écrit : > On 27 Jan 2008, at 12:23, Graham Percival wrote: > > >> And what about renaming \times to \tuplet? ;) > > > > I think that everybody agreed with it. Some people wanted a weird > > \tuplet 3:4 { }