On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 21:11 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 20:20 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Joe,
> >>
> >> I am still experiencing this infinite loop after your fix. However,
> >> if I
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 20:20 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> I am still experiencing this infinite loop after your fix. However,
>> if I remove the #ifdef structure and keep the function and function
>> call,
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 20:20 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 11:02 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >> Could someone put this into a init_fpu() function with appropriate
> >> #ifdefs, and call that from
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 11:02 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> Could someone put this into a init_fpu() function with appropriate
>> #ifdefs, and call that from main() ?
>
> Done.
Hi Joe,
I am still experiencing this infinite
2008/5/31 John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> can't be disturbed by any breakage or brain surgery on master. It would
> also make sure doc changes are sooner available to end users, and it
I have no plans of any brain surgery.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~h
Hi,
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> So no change is needed in gitweb to view such forked repositories, but
> creating them and assigning them permissions, via a web interface, needs
> to be contributed in the Savane code (somewhere in the Git
> administration pages).
BTW: If I a
Hi,
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Gitweb is a repository browser. repo.or.cz does more than that,
> including repository instanciation, permissions replication, etc.
>
> (In addition, repo.or.cz uses a custom gitweb branch which isn't
> merged very often in the official repositor
Hi,
Gitweb is a repository browser. repo.or.cz does more than that,
including repository instanciation, permissions replication, etc.
(In addition, repo.or.cz uses a custom gitweb branch which isn't
merged very often in the official repository.)
So no change is needed in gitweb to view such fork
Hi,
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I have also tried building using GUB as some point in time. Worked
> without any major problems as far as I can remember.
Do not get me wrong: setting up was not the problem. However, when I
would have needed to fix a bug (some dependencies wer
On Sat, 31 May 2008 10:05:11 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Really, the whole point of GDP is to reduce the burden of doc
> > maintenance. Barring writing new docs for new features (which I
> > can't predict), I expect that maintaing the .itely files will be
> > about 2 hou
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, May 31, 2008 8:54 AM
On Sat, 31 May 2008 09:28:50 +0200
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An unsure question is, should big doc work like GDP go on on master
after 2.12?
No, because barring a miracle, there won't be anybody[1] left to do
big doc work.
On Sat, 31 May 2008 09:25:11 +0200
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose you each take over one of the two groups of files to be
> reorganized in all languages:
>
> unfretted-strings.itely
> fretted-strings.itely
Could be changes to these. I told people to work on subsections
in
John, you wrote
Trevor, are sections in Input stabilized enough so we can reorganize
translations too? In fact, this chapter is not translated in any
language, except one or two nodes in French, so reorganization in
translations is very cheap for this chapter (no more than 10 minutes).
The
On Sat, 31 May 2008 09:57:47 +0200
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of, may I document check-texi-refs.py usage in
> writing-texinfo.txt? Currently it's only documented in a Git commit
> message :-/
Sure, go ahead.
Cheers,
- Graham
_
On 2008/05/30, Graham Percival wrote:
> We're on track for a release in Aug.
I'll be away from Aug 3rd until Aug 23th, I may be able to have a
limited Internet connection at this time but will have little time, so
I'd prefer we release 2.12 before the end of July if possible.
> - the translatio
On Sat, 31 May 2008 09:28:50 +0200
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An unsure question is, should big doc work like GDP go on on master
> after 2.12?
No, because barring a miracle, there won't be anybody[1] left to do
big doc work.
[1] Trevor, I mean no offense whatsoever when I impl
On 2008/05/30, Francisco Vila wrote:
> From my humble position, I beg you please, please, \repeat unfold 10 {
> please, } to make possible that translated docs are updateable on
> stable, after release.
Sure, they are, as long as the stable branch is regularly released.
An unsure question is, sho
On 2008/05/30, Till Rettig wrote:
> Francisco Vila wrote:
> > Count on me, but my GDP contributions will slow down (even more!).
> > Graham will complain. This month is terrible for me, and summer is
> > always uncertain. Please tell me what to do as precisely as you can.
> >
> The last sentence
18 matches
Mail list logo
