Hi,
When typesetting a book with many scores and with possibly some text
sections, page breaking may become an inextricable issue:
1) the default, "optimal", page breaker, which gives the best result
wrt line and page breaking when there is no or little text, cannot be
used when the book is ve
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will be happy to clean up the formatting. I can see that the code lines
> are too long,
> which give lots of random wraps and hides the structure.
>
> I intend to reformat the code, by using two-space indents where t
> -Original Message-
> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 5:31 AM
> To: Carl D. Sorensen
> Cc: lily-devel
> Subject: Re: fret diagram comments
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Carl D. Sorensen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will be happy
Hi,
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> John Mandereau wrote Saturday, June 21, 2008 7:48 PM
>
> > Are you sure it's not possible to build LilyPond on Windows with
> > MinGW? AFAIK nobody has ever done it, but it's certainly possible,
> > maybe with some changes in the build system ne
Johannes Schindelin skrev:
FWIW the proper way to undo a merge is to
$ git rebase --onto MERGE_HEAD^ MERGE_HEAD
where MERGE_HEAD has to be substituted by the merge commit that you want
to undo. (This command transplants the commits you did since the merge
onto the commit which was cu
John Mandereau skrev:
Should I "push -f" ?
IIRC this is not allowed on git.sv.gnu.org. If you really want to do
this (it seems to be the case, although I didn't catch all details of
the story), delete dev/run on git.sv.gnu.org
git push ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/srv/git/lilypond.git :dev/rune
t
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Rune Zedeler wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin skrev:
> > FWIW the proper way to undo a merge is to
> >
> > $ git rebase --onto MERGE_HEAD^ MERGE_HEAD
> >
> > where MERGE_HEAD has to be substituted by the merge commit that you
> > want to undo. (This command transplants t
2008/6/22 Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Will people having pulled from me up to a point before the merge (i.e.
> before the new dev/rune differs from the old dev/rune) be negatively
> affected by this, or will it only be a problem for the ones having pulled
> after the merge?
I'm not sure a
Could somebody add a [no-ragged-right] option to lilypond-book?
There's one example in the tutorial that could use this, now that
ragged-right is the default.
It should be just a matter of copying whatever is done for
[ragged-right]. Neil?
Cheers,
- Graham
_
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:14 AM
>
>> What about
>> \arpeggioParenOn
>> \arpeggioParenOff
>> ?
>
> On/Off work well when there are just two possible states,
> but here we have the default, bracket a
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:02:11 -0700
"Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Trevor Daniels
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:14 AM
> >
> >> What about
> >> \arpeggioParenOn
> >> \arpeggioParenOff
> >> ?
> >
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:02:11 -0700
> "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, there are currently five possible states: default, up, down,
>> bracket, and parenthesis. So we need to find a solution th
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:02:10 -0700
"Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:02:11 -0700
> > "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Actually, there are currently five possi
I'm working on the Piano section of the GDP and had a question. The
notation manual includes a template for piano music with centered
dynamics, and there was some discussion a while back about including a
PianoDynamics context in LilyPond itself:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/200
> 2. If not, how do we indicate the 5 states listed above?
> \arpeggioNormal
> \arpeggioPointUp
> \arpeggioPointDown
> \arpeggioBracket
> \arpeggioParenthesis
"Point" is okay. Another possibility could be "ArrowUp" and
"ArrowDown".
I like Arrow better.
Since the problem was with Up/Down
15 matches
Mail list logo