2008/12/17 Neil Puttock :
> 2008/12/16 Maximilian Albert :
>
>> Alright, the adapted patch #2 is attached. Obviously I put too much
>> focus on making a regression test more visually appealing than minimal
>> and functional...
>
> Looks OK, but your \header block isn't closed.
Whoops, corrected in
2008/12/16 Maximilian Albert :
> Alright, the adapted patch #2 is attached. Obviously I put too much
> focus on making a regression test more visually appealing than minimal
> and functional...
Looks OK, but your \header block isn't closed.
You can junk the \layout block, since lilypond-book set
2008/12/13 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> No need to test 3 values, 0.0 and != 0.0 should be enough. Be sure to
> test both stem up and stem down.
>
> Use only 1 note for each situation (or, if you need to test beams, 2).
Alright, the adapted patch #2 is attached. Obviously I put too much
focus on making a
I would have beaten the the world record of the 100m escaping out of
the music school if I would have had to say "double bémol sol".
Nevertheless it is a matter of vocal cords, I still sing "sol" and not
"fa"...
Once a French conductor sang the melody "a a gis a g fis g" with the
words "la
2008/12/14 Werner LEMBERG :
>
>> Can we please make sure to include at least one example of input
>> syntax in the newsfile?
>
> Well, it's Maximilian's turn...
Yup, sorry. During the last couple of days I didn't have access to the
computer I presently work on (and won't have for another few days)
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > Why is Dutch the default language for note-entry? English uses the
> > fewest keystrokes. For comparison, here's a measure from Chopin's
> > Fantasie-impromptu:
>
> because we are Dutch
Appendix G has entries for /: and /+ , used in \chordmode { }
There is no entry for \chordmode
There is no entry for the symbols '<' and '>'
discussion of the < notelist> convention (an alternate way to
enter chords in a note stream), is left to an entry in Appendix H (Combining
notes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2008 20:49:56 schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
> Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 18:33 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Reinhold
> Kainhofer:
>
> [back onto lily-devel]
>
> > Actually, even that does not work, since during the execution of th
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 18:33 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Reinhold
Kainhofer:
[back onto lily-devel]
> Actually, even that does not work, since during the execution of the
> configure
> checks, there is
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home/reinhold/lilypond/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib"
Why is this
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 18:05 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Reinhold
Kainhofer:
[oops, back onto lily-devel]
> > This is odd, we should not be linking to anything in tools/. Can you
> > figure out why that happens?
>
> In the lilypond config.log:
> configure:8037: checking guile compile flags
Le 16.12.2008 17:20, Carl D. Sorensen disait :
On 12/16/08 8:58 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 15:58 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Hans Aberg:
On 16 Dec 2008, at 14:48, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
You might call for using Unicode:
r16 g♯( a g♯ f♯♯ g♯ c♯ e d♯ c♯ d♯
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Why is Dutch the default language for note-entry?
> English uses the fewest keystrokes. For comparison,
> here's a measure from Chopin's Fantasie-impromptu:
because we are Dutch, and because we think the Dutch are better in
general: you can a
Hi Carl,
I think that, even though accidentals come before the note in musical
output, in the text stream g# is much more readable than #g.
Agreed — at least in English, one says (i.e., reads) "g sharp" not
"sharp g".
Best,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-
On 12/16/08 8:58 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:
> Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 15:58 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Hans Aberg:
>> On 16 Dec 2008, at 14:48, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>
You might call for using Unicode:
r16 g♯( a g♯ f♯♯ g♯ c♯ e d♯ c♯ d♯ c♯ b♯ c♯ e
g♯)
You
But then why not use a font like this:
http://www.icogitate.com/~ergosum/fonts/musicfonts.htm
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 15:58 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Hans Aberg:
On 16 Dec 2008, at 14:48, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
You might call for using Unicode:
r16
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 15:58 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Hans Aberg:
> On 16 Dec 2008, at 14:48, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> >> You might call for using Unicode:
> >> r16 g♯( a g♯ f♯♯ g♯ c♯ e d♯ c♯ d♯ c♯ b♯ c♯ e
> >> g♯)
> >>
> >> You need a font, though, and perhaps a special key map, too.
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 05:58 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Could this be an independant language? I don't see why it's
> stuffed into ly/nederlands.ly (other than this being the default).
> Could it be ly/utf8.ly instead?
So it should be, left as an excercise to
I-won-t-say-
No it, can't be. Think of Bb H in german etc.
Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:48:43PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 13:07 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Hans Aberg:
You need a font, though, and perhaps a special key map, too.
Now that
On 16 Dec 2008, at 14:48, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
You might call for using Unicode:
r16 g♯( a g♯ f♯♯ g♯ c♯ e d♯ c♯ d♯ c♯ b♯ c♯ e
g♯)
You need a font, though, and perhaps a special key map, too.
Now that's a fun idea. It even works!
Thank you. I think it increases readability, too.
Han
On 16 Dec 2008, at 15:06, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Well, I then suggest to be consequent, using the following Unicode
characters instead of ♯♯ and ♭♭:
U+1D12A MUSICAL SYMBOL DOUBLE SHARP
U+1D12B MUSICAL SYMBOL DOUBLE FLAT
Sure, only that both should possible to use, in Western music notat
> > On 16 Dec 2008, at 05:58, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> > You might call for using Unicode:
> > r16 g♯( a g♯ f♯♯ g♯ c♯ e d♯ c♯ d♯ c♯ b♯ c♯ e
> > g♯)
> >
> > You need a font, though, and perhaps a special key map, too.
>
> Now that's a fun idea. It even works!
Well, I then suggest to be cons
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:48:43PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 13:07 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Hans Aberg:
> > You need a font, though, and perhaps a special key map, too.
>
> Now that's a fun idea. It even works!
Could this be an independant language? I don't
Op dinsdag 16-12-2008 om 13:07 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Hans Aberg:
> On 16 Dec 2008, at 05:58, Mark Polesky wrote:
> You might call for using Unicode:
> r16 g♯( a g♯ f♯♯ g♯ c♯ e d♯ c♯ d♯ c♯ b♯ c♯ e
> g♯)
>
> You need a font, though, and perhaps a special key map, too.
Now that's a fun
On 16 Dec 2008, at 05:58, Mark Polesky wrote:
English uses the fewest keystrokes.
Computer languages no more attempt to minimize the number of
keystrokes, as code tends to be unreadable.
For comparison,
here's a measure from Chopin's Fantasie-impromptu:
English:
r16 gs( a gs fss gs cs e
24 matches
Mail list logo
