Re: Lyric alignment within ligatures

2009-04-21 Thread Robert Memering
Michael Käppler schrieb: Hi all, I recently noticed that ligatures are not automatically noticed as a melismatic section. That means, I always have to use the syntax: \[ bla \melisma bla \melismaEnd \] However, I would consider ligatures to be melismatic in any case. What's your point?

Re: adding snippets manually

2009-04-21 Thread John Mandereau
John Mandereau a écrit : People should never be bored by manually editing snippets in input/new to write them in input/lsr, as this can be handled automatically by makelsr, but there are some formatting requirements for stuff in input/new that are not necessary for regression tests, e.g.

Re: Reverting Beat Grouping Commands

2009-04-21 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 4/18/09 5:54 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/4/15 Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu: So why can't we define an AutoBeamPlaceHolder grob description (defined in scm/define-grobs.scm), which has an auto-beam-setting-interface (defined in

Re: Reverting Beat Grouping Commands

2009-04-21 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/4/21 Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu: I haven't checked yet for beam subdividing (I will need to, I know), but for autobeaming, the work is done in a scheme callback, where the context is available. There is no callback, otherwise get_property (autoBeamCheck) would automatically

Re: Lyric alignment within ligatures

2009-04-21 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/4/21 Robert Memering memer...@uni-muenster.de: I have come across several cases with non-melismatic ligatures in renaissance polyphony. Indeed, I am afraid that changing the default behaviour would break several of my scores. This wouldn't be an issue since it would be implemented in

Re: lilypond wikipedia

2009-04-21 Thread Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima
Hi everybody! I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic. How is it going? (is it going?) Thanks! Helder ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: GUB3: M4 not accurately recognized?

2009-04-21 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Op woensdag 15-04-2009 om 00:51 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick McCarty: I am trying to build a mingw LilyPond installer, but I am running into a problem at the tools::bison configure stage. It seems

Re: Reverting Beat Grouping Commands

2009-04-21 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 4/21/09 3:04 PM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/4/21 Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu: I haven't checked yet for beam subdividing (I will need to, I know), but for autobeaming, the work is done in a scheme callback, where the context is available. There is no

Re: GUB3 at the lilypond-installer stage

2009-04-21 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi Jan, On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:43:07PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: * it should -C change directory to target/installer/..., I see no reason for . to exist, be writable, much less to be open()ed * my tools/root/usr/bin/tar does not seem to do this, so

Re: lilypond wikipedia

2009-04-21 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
Wikipedia won't allow lilypond due to security and performance reasons as far as I know. I and other have already created quite useful mediawiki plugins. Bert Francisco Vila wrote: 2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima heldergeov...@gmail.com: Hi everybody! I would like to know if there