Graham Percival wrote:
> Yes, come up with another score marking. Granted, it might get
[snip]
Before I make a bunch of replacements and a patch, can anyone see a
potential problem with changing the example in LM 5.1.5 to use these
functions instead:
%%
mpdolce = #(make-dynamic-script (
On 5/10/09 4:43 PM, "Anthony W. Youngman"
wrote:
> In message , Carl D. Sorensen
> writes
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/9/09 4:21 PM, "Anthony W. Youngman"
>> wrote:
>>> So - is there a function that combines stencils? Or where can I find the
>>> code for \default (I did look ...) so I can try and wri
Neil,
Thanks for the review. I've put my responses below.
On 5/10/09 5:17 PM, "n.putt...@gmail.com" wrote:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/62076/diff/7/1008#newcode65
> Line 65: SCM no_chord_markup = get_property ("noChordSymbol");
> \set noChordSymbol = ##f will cause (harmless but annoying)
> But, the key players dismissed it, did nothing and yes...2 years
> later I am a bit frustrated. My post yesterday asking why after 2
> years nothing had been done, was not really too out of line if you
> think about it.
One of the key players, Rune, has passed away.
We can answer your request
In message , Aaron Andrew
Hunt writes
On May 11, 2009, at 2:24 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Dewdman,
It might help to read this:
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Essays/smart-questions.html
Very interesting link! It might as well be called "In Defense of Being
a Complete A-Hole"
It
Hi,
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Aaron Andrew Hunt wrote:
> On May 11, 2009, at 2:24 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> >Dewdman,
> >It might help to read this:
> >http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Essays/smart-questions.html
>
> Very interesting link! It might as well be called "In Defense of Being a
Aaron Andrew Hunt wrote:
On May 11, 2009, at 2:24 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Dewdman,
It might help to read this:
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Essays/smart-questions.html
Very interesting link! It might as well be called "In Defense of Being a
Complete A-Hole"
No, programmers /
In message <23486715.p...@talk.nabble.com>, Dewdman42
writes
If I knew how I would. isn't it obvious that a few people hold the power to
control the development of lilypond while the rest of us are mere mortals?
It's Free Software. "He who puts in the effort makes the rules". I had a
project
On May 11, 2009, at 2:24 PM, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Dewdman,
It might help to read this:
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Essays/smart-questions.html
Very interesting link! It might as well be called "In Defense of
Being a Complete A-Hole"
No, programmers / hackers are smart folks a
Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:22:02AM -0700, Dewdman42 wrote:
But, the key players dismissed it, did nothing and yes...2 years later I am
a bit frustrated. My post yesterday asking why after 2 years nothing had
been done, was not really too out of line if you think about it.
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:22:02AM -0700, Dewdman42 wrote:
>
> But, the key players dismissed it, did nothing and yes...2 years later I am
> a bit frustrated. My post yesterday asking why after 2 years nothing had
> been done, was not really too out of line if you think about it.
That's garbag
Search this mailist for previous discussion. In summary,
1) yes, we know about this possible use.
2) yes, we know what to do.
3) no, nobody has volunteered to do it.
If you're willing to help out, please find that previous
discussion (maybe Feb 2009? March 2009? Certainly between Jan
and now) a
Yes, come up with another score marking. Granted, it might get
obsoleted... hopefully the \mpdolce example will be obsoleted in
the next few months. So perhaps this subsection should be
rewritten to show how we would go about adding a new command,
taking an existing one as an example.
But this l
Hey guys,
I'm looking at this example now and am not sure what to do with it. While
it's true that the tempoMark scheme function itself is not necessary now
that \tempo does the same thing, it's also true that the point of this
passage in the LM 5.1.5 is to show how use definitions and to place t
Here is the original thread from the user list, where I did ask politely and
provided many screen shots and as much info as possible.
http://www.nabble.com/PDF-Problem-td11699420.html#a11699420
Grahmn acted like his usual elitist self, but I temporarily ignored him and
continued pleading.
Am 11.05.2009 um 18:46 schrieb Dewdman42:
I will just check back in a few years then to see if Lilypond becomes
useable for the rest of us and you scheme heads can play around in
your
little pond by yourselves.
And I'm sure the lilypond community will be diminished by not having
your pres
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Dewdman42 wrote:
> didn't. The only response is "fix it yourself"?
>
> That's not a realistic response, THAT is a BS response from someone who does
> not give a damn about the lilypond user community.
It's the response to someone who does not give a damn about t
Dewdman, the bigger problem is your initial email, which is itself
hostile and insulting:
Dewdman42 wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Dewdman42 wrote:
2 years and still nobody has bothered to fix lilypond so that it can
create
PDF's that actually look good in acroread?
(sigh)
You ou
Playing music as an amateur and using occasionally typesetting I discovered
Lilypond some years ago. And I used it with increasing enthusiasm. I'm writing
music/math/computer science occasionally in Wikipedia too.
Math is no problem because with TeX there is a tool which exceeds expectations.
But
Wow, I see that after 2 years you still haven't stopped acting like a jerk
yet either Grahm. Bravo mate.
I will just check back in a few years then to see if Lilypond becomes
useable for the rest of us and you scheme heads can play around in your
little pond by yourselves.
Quite unfortunate t
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:27:48AM -0700, Dewdman42 wrote:
>
> If I knew how I would. isn't it obvious that a few people hold the power to
> control the development of lilypond while the rest of us are mere mortals?
BS. You're human, we're human. If we can do it (after months or
years of learn
If I knew how I would. isn't it obvious that a few people hold the power to
control the development of lilypond while the rest of us are mere mortals?
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Dewdman42 wrote:
>>
>> 2 years and still nobody has bothered to fix lilypond so
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Dewdman42 wrote:
>
> 2 years and still nobody has bothered to fix lilypond so that it can create
> PDF's that actually look good in acroread?
>
> (sigh)
>
Yes, it is sad. You would almost think that noone gets paid to fix
user complaints.
Oh, wait.
--
Han-We
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:50:02AM -0700, Dewdman42 wrote:
>
> 2 years and still nobody has bothered to fix lilypond so that it can create
> PDF's that actually look good in acroread?
>
> (sigh)
I agree. Why haven't you bothered to submit patches to fix this?
- Graham
___
2 years and still nobody has bothered to fix lilypond so that it can create
PDF's that actually look good in acroread?
(sigh)
I thought Rune was on to some good stuff there in 2007 and it appears nobody
would listen. Thanks Rune for your efforts in 2007, but I'm sorry to hear
that it was droppe
25 matches
Mail list logo
