2009/5/24 Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca:
Can the instrument name blob take advantage of a vertical skyline
(profile?) the way the rest of the notation (notes, etc.) take advantage of
a horizontal skyline? That would certainly solve the problem precisely,
without having to
Dear list,
i am using a 2.13 lilypond compiled from today's git repo, and i am
observing - in comparison to a version from around 10th of April - that the
page breaking strategy seems to have changed significantly.
Which leads me in one case of a before 47page piano reduction score (1 to 4
i am using a 2.13 lilypond compiled from today's git repo, and i am
observing - in comparison to a version from around 10th of April -
that the page breaking strategy seems to have changed significantly.
Which leads me in one case of a before 47page piano reduction score
(1 to 4 staves per
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
i am using a 2.13 lilypond compiled from today's git repo, and i am
observing - in comparison to a version from around 10th of April -
that the page breaking strategy seems to have changed significantly.
Which leads me in one case of a before 47page piano reduction
Arno Waschk wrote:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
i am using a 2.13 lilypond compiled from today's git repo, and i am
observing - in comparison to a version from around 10th of April -
that the page breaking strategy seems to have changed significantly.
Which leads me in one case of a
2009/5/22 Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com:
Initial efforts are fruitless. I installed GNUMake on the XP partition, but
when I type the command make in the dos shell, it says there's no such
program. I tried Make and make.exe as well with the same results. I
have no idea what to try
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 11:53 -0700, ArnoWaschk wrote:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
i am using a 2.13 lilypond compiled from today's git repo, and i am
observing - in comparison to a version from around 10th of April -
that the page breaking strategy seems to have changed significantly.
Am 23.05.2009, 04:41 Uhr, schrieb Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com:
I've made some progress. When I try to run make score on Windows XP,
I get the following message:
make: *** No rule to make target `stamitz.ly', needed by
`stamitz.pdf'. Stop.
I get no such message when I run it
I've made some progress. When I try to run make score on Windows
XP,
As it stands, the Makefile doesn't work with Windows. For
documentation purposes I strongly suggest to cook up a special
Windows Makefile with the same functionality.
%.pdf %.midi: %.ly
$(LILY_CMD) $; \
if
Oh man, this is just way too frustrating.
Maybe it's a Windows thing, but nothing about git is clear to me
anymore. I feel like I'm trying to learn from three different
manuals, none of which quite work. Then I try out a couple of git
commands in the bash shell and next thing I know,
forgot the png...
attachment: editmsg.png___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
On 5/24/09 4:49 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/24 Carl D. Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
Thanks, Applied.
Unfortunately, there are two serious flaws here:
- keySignature alists which aren't
And how do I exit the EDIT_COMMITMSG window? I've included an
image showing the window. If I click on the X button, the whole
git bash shell closes along with it. That can't be right.
Okay, this one I figured out. It says here
On 5/24/09 10:46 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
And how do I exit the EDIT_COMMITMSG window? I've included an
image showing the window. If I click on the X button, the whole
git bash shell closes along with it. That can't be right.
Okay, this one I figured out. It says
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 07:40:08PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
I guess I'm confused about the difference between origin and
master. And the difference between pulling and fetching (and
cloning, though that's not mentioned in the CG).
git clone is a command that you use to *copy* the remote
On 5/24/09 10:57 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 07:40:08PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
The already up to date means that all of your remote tracking
branches reflect the current state of the branches at git.sv.gnu.org,
and that your local branch has
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:07:06PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 5/24/09 10:57 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 07:40:08PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
The already up to date means that all of your remote tracking
branches reflect the current
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:33:51PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 5/24/09 8:40 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think the instructions in the CG just aren't clear enough. Is
anyone out there happily making git patches on Windows? Let me
know!
I believe that
18 matches
Mail list logo
