wikipedia...

2009-06-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Hi there, Triggered by recent wikipedia messages, I had a peek at our http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilypond page and found it still has the weird (long and not very impressive) fire breathers example. Why the .ly at all, better show impressive output and move .ly example to a LilyPond_Lang

Naming output files - status update please?

2009-06-04 Thread Ian Hulin
Hi all, I've been prompted by a reply from Mats on the -user list. >See >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-02/msg00833.html >and follow-ups for the previous discussion on the topic. As far as I >can see, an implementation proposal is already available, just to >commit. >

Re: wikipedia...

2009-06-04 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/4 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : > Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 11:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco > Vila: > >> First thing we can do, given that the talk section is intended to >> improve the article, is to write down these objections in it. > > Well, that's what Han-Wen did in 2006.  Nothing

LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?

2009-06-04 Thread Graham Percival
If you're involved with LSR, check out the LSR update docs in the CG on kainhofer in a day or so; please make corrections. Could somebody process the files in input/new/revised/ ? And why do we need this directory, anyway? Shouldn't those files just be dumped into input/new/ ? Cheers, - Graham

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-04 Thread Paul Scott
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org. I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too. The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there is no file gs_init.ps located

Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question)

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Mark Polesky wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> I don't know if there is any performance penalty, but it's probably >> negligible.  You could propose that these procedures be made public; I >> am okay with it. > > Then if no one has any reservations, does anyone wa

Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc

2009-06-04 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <200905312229.35014.reinh...@kainhofer.com>, Reinhold Kainhofer writes Am Sonntag, 31. Mai 2009 21:22:41 schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen: Op zaterdag 30-05-2009 om 22:46 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham Percival: > Any more tips? I'd really like to get this working so I can make > re

Re: wikipedia...

2009-06-04 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/4 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : > Hi there, > > Triggered by recent wikipedia messages, I had a peek at our > >    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilypond ... > Possibly it's no wonder that wikipedia doesn't use lilypond, > considering that our article on wikipedia is so bad? First thing we can do, g

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash when output-preview-framework is missing

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:46:11PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Am Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2009 22:18:23 schrieb Neil

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-04 Thread Paul Scott
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org. I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too. The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there is no file gs_init.ps located

Re: wikipedia...

2009-06-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Op donderdag 04-06-2009 om 11:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco Vila: > First thing we can do, given that the talk section is intended to > improve the article, is to write down these objections in it. Well, that's what Han-Wen did in 2006. Nothing happened. I'd say: be bold and fix it

Re: LSR update policies, and WTM is input/new/revised/ ?

2009-06-04 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Graham Percival wrote: If you're involved with LSR, check out the LSR update docs in the CG on kainhofer in a day or so; please make corrections. Could somebody process the files in input/new/revised/ ? And why do we need this directory, anyway? Shouldn't those files just be dumped into input/

Website broken

2009-06-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Hi there, can someone fix this? This currently hangs the website update. mkdir -p out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/ msgfmt --output=out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/newweb.mo po/de.po po/de.po:166: end-of-line within string po/de.po:167: end-of-line within string -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - ht

Re: Website broken

2009-06-04 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Hi there, > > can someone fix this?  This currently hangs the website update. > > mkdir -p out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/ > msgfmt --output=out/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/newweb.mo po/de.po > po/de.po:166: end-of-line within string > po/de.po:167: en