>> In other words, some makefile hacking is needed, which I would
>> probably need to delegate.
I agree.
> I doubt that the regtests compile without warnings,
Correct. Some of them are even expected to emit warning or error messages.
> and I'm not certain that we have enough Frogs to eat all t
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:22:02PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:01:21PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 05:39:45PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > >
> > > -dwarning-as-error
> > > looks fine to me.
> >
> > Okay. On second thought, it look
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:01:21PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 05:39:45PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:29:44PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > > 1.) I used Jan's suggestion for -d option name, but I'm not sure this
> > > is the best name
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 05:39:45PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:29:44PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > 1.) I used Jan's suggestion for -d option name, but I'm not sure this
> > is the best name. What should the option be called?
>
> -dwarning-as-error
> looks fine
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:29:44PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> 1.) I used Jan's suggestion for -d option name, but I'm not sure this
> is the best name. What should the option be called?
-dwarning-as-error
looks fine to me.
> 3.) I don't know how to enable the -d option by default for regres
Hello,
I have updated my patchset on Rietveld:
http://codereview.appspot.com/83046/show
Thank you all for your reviews. I have a few questions/concerns:
1.) I used Jan's suggestion for -d option name, but I'm not sure this
is the best name. What should the option be called?
2.) Is backend-li
2009/7/5 Graham Percival :
> The current policy is that only crashes and regressions get higher
> priority; everything else is medium, low, or postponed. If we
> listed those bugs as higher priority, would it change anything?
> Would Chris work on it before Aug? Would somebody else pick up
> that
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Mark Knoop wrote:
> At 13:32 on 05 Jul 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2009/7/5 Mark Knoop :
>> > http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1163
>>
>> > Mark Knoop
>>
>> Thank you, here is comprehensively explained. Are you horndude77?
>
> No. But I do wish th
At 13:32 on 05 Jul 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/7/5 Mark Knoop :
> > http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1163
>
> > Mark Knoop
>
> Thank you, here is comprehensively explained. Are you horndude77?
No. But I do wish they would fix this...
--
Mark Knoop
2009/7/5 Mark Knoop :
> http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1163
> Mark Knoop
Thank you, here is comprehensively explained. Are you horndude77?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-
At 10:31 on 05 Jul 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
> you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
> server could adjust the MIME type of png images so the browser offers
> to open it directly with a suitable
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2009/7/5 Cameron Horsburgh :
>> Francisco Vila writes:
>>
>>> The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
>>> you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
>>> server could adjust the MIME type of png images so the browser
2009/7/5 Cameron Horsburgh :
> Francisco Vila writes:
>
>> The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
>> you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
>> server could adjust the MIME type of png images so the browser offers
>> to open it directly wi
Francisco Vila writes:
> The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
> you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
> server could adjust the MIME type of png images so the browser offers
> to open it directly with a suitable application instead?
>
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 10:31:46AM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
> you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
> server could adjust the MIME type of png images so the browser offers
> to open it directly
The example PNG images on bug comments have to be downloaded before
you can view them, at least on my Ubuntu system. I wonder whether the
server could adjust the MIME type of png images so the browser offers
to open it directly with a suitable application instead?
Or, is it completely out of our r
16 matches
Mail list logo
