Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Mark Polesky
Patrick McCarty wrote: I just compiled the docs, and it looks great! Is it ready to apply? - Mark ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Trevor Daniels
Mark Polesky wrote Saturday, July 11, 2009 11:36 PM Okay, here's a patch. Can someone test this? Applies fine and output looks good. My only comment is the heading - should this not be changed to The Emmentaler font? See

Re: delaying new website after 2.14

2009-07-12 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
On za, 2009-07-11 at 07:00 -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: bzr diff -r29..30 sap.1 manpage.patch Now, it worked, but to me this is harder than git. I think the equiivalent is a bundle. Also, bzr supports realative revisions, eg bzr diff -r-1: probably does it.

Re: PATCH: Consolidate autobeaming to one property that controls it

2009-07-12 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/7/12 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu: I've created a second patch set with the whitespace removed (along with automatic removal of whitespace from the lines of the files that weren't part of the patch). Brilliant work, Carl! I'll comment on individual issues in Rietveld shortly. I

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/7/12 Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com: Is it ready to apply? Looks fine. If I may sugget one refinement: use the quote environment (it produces nicer looking examples in html). @lilypond[quote] Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list

Re: Obsolete snippets

2009-07-12 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/7/11 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu: Does one then go and remove the snippet reference from the translated .itely files as well? This is what I've always done, otherwise you're left with broken documentation. Regards, Neil ___

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Mark Polesky
From: Neil Puttock wrote: @lilypond[quote] Okay, here's a new patch using @lilypond[quote]. I'm leaving it called The Feta font for now. Changing it to The Emmentaler font would require changing some 50 or so cross-references in the source and I think that should be a different patch. Please

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:32:24AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: From: Neil Puttock wrote: @lilypond[quote] Okay, here's a new patch using @lilypond[quote]. I'm leaving it called The Feta font for now. Changing it to The Emmentaler font would require changing some 50 or so

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/7/12 Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com: Please double-check once more and apply. For some reason, I can't apply it. Applying: Docs: NR B.6 The Feta font: Organize glyph list. /home/neil/lilypond/.git/rebase-apply/patch:15: trailing whitespace.

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:06:49PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: 2009/7/12 Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com: Please double-check once more and apply. For some reason, I can't apply it. Applying: Docs: NR B.6 The Feta font: Organize glyph list.

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Mark Polesky
Patrick McCarty wrote: Rather weirdly, your earlier patch won't apply now either. Did you do git rebase --abort before trying to apply his earlier patch? You've got push access now, haven't you? If so, you can do it yourself. He doesn't, but he should have access.

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/7/12 Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com: Did you do  git rebase --abort before trying to apply his earlier patch? Of course. :) I just got confused with different patches and applied the wrong one. Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 01:07:22PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:32:24AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: From: Neil Puttock wrote: @lilypond[quote] Okay, here's a new patch using @lilypond[quote]. I'm leaving it called The Feta font for now. Changing it to

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 01:14:23PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: Patrick McCarty wrote: Rather weirdly, your earlier patch won't apply now either. Did you do git rebase --abort before trying to apply his earlier patch? You've got push access now, haven't you? If so,

Re: Patch: Delete intermediate ps files

2009-07-12 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/7/10 Maximilian Albert maximilian.alb...@googlemail.com: OK, thanks. Now the docs compiled fine and I could check that the result of my patch is as intended. Any further comments or are they ready to be applied? Thanks, they're both applied. Regards, Neil

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Mark Polesky
Patrick McCarty wrote: Rechecking your patch, it did in fact have DOS line endings. So, I changed them to UNIX line endings in Vim: :set ff=unix and then it applied cleanly. Maybe something happened between the creation of the patch and sending the email that changed the line

Re: improving NR B.6 The Feta Font

2009-07-12 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote: Patrick McCarty wrote: Rechecking your patch, it did in fact have DOS line endings. So, I changed them to UNIX line endings in Vim: :set ff=unix and then it applied cleanly. Maybe something happened

Re: [Patch] Replace deprecated md5 module by hashlib

2009-07-12 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Maximilian Albertmaximilian.alb...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/7/11 Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com: How about using a `try' block to import conditionally? Thanks for the suggestion. Here is an updated patch, in case peope want to have this (otherwise please

LM Errata

2009-07-12 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Hello, Here's errata for the LM. Some of these are very subjective, so just pick and choose what seems appropriate. Others are just typos or examples that aren't showing up. Thanks for making the LM so nice! -Jonathan 1.1 Background Engraving 1st paragraph: The plate would be inked,

Re: New format for autobeaming rules

2009-07-12 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 7/12/09 11:13 AM, n.putt...@gmail.com n.putt...@gmail.com wrote: http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1044 File Documentation/user/rhythms.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1044#newcode1662 Line 1662: of the beam, e.g. @code{#'(1 . 16)}, or

Re: PATCH: Consolidate autobeaming to one property that controls it

2009-07-12 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 7/12/09 9:43 AM, Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/7/12 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu: I've created a second patch set with the whitespace removed (along with automatic removal of whitespace from the lines of the files that weren't part of the patch). Brilliant work,

Re: New format for autobeaming rules

2009-07-12 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 7/12/09 11:13 AM, n.putt...@gmail.com n.putt...@gmail.com wrote: http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1045 File input/lsr/automatic-beams-two-per-two-in-4-4-or-2-2-time-signature.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1045#newcode1 Line 1: %% Do not edit

Re: New format for autobeaming rules

2009-07-12 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 7/12/09 11:13 AM, n.putt...@gmail.com n.putt...@gmail.com wrote: http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1045 File input/lsr/automatic-beams-two-per-two-in-4-4-or-2-2-time-signature.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1045#newcode1 Line 1: %% Do not edit

Re: Patch: Delete intermediate ps files

2009-07-12 Thread Maximilian Albert
2009/7/13 Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com: Thanks, they're both applied. Thanks a lot! So does this close issue 685? What's the status about .log files being created on Windows mentioned there? Max ___ lilypond-devel mailing list