Re: What's the deal with info documentation images?

Graham Percival writes: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:10:53PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> Graham Percival writes: >> >> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:50:13AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> > I believe this only occurs in general.info, correct? via macros >> > in Documentation/common-macros.it

LilyPond talks earlier this year at IRCAM and Musikhochschule Stuttgart

Hi all, I wanted to take a minute to provide feedback on two LilyPond-oriented presentations I was able to make earlier this year. This has been a busy year and so I've been largely absent from the -user and -devel lists for some time now (though usually catching up on the weekends). So early apol

[patch] additional make target for website

Here's a patch that adds a special target (tentatively called "web-gop") to the **main** makefile. I think we'll want something like this for the actual server, although obviously we'd need to change the examples/ rule in Documentation/GNUmakefile. My first patch only added it to Documentation/GN

Re: `make install' is broken

On 2009-08-27, Neil Puttock wrote: > 2009/8/27 Patrick McCarty : > > > I just pushed a fix that works for me.  Please test. > > No problems here. Thanks for testing, Neil. I made one further refinement to configure.in, just in case the Century Schoolbook L fonts are installed in more than one l

[PATCHES] Two interfaces moved to Scheme

Hi, Here are two patches for review at Rietveld, which implement tuplet-number-interface and grid-line-interface in Scheme: http://codereview.appspot.com/109112/show http://codereview.appspot.com/109113/show Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing

Re: `make install' is broken

2009/8/27 Patrick McCarty : > I just pushed a fix that works for me.  Please test. No problems here. Cheers, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: `make install' is broken

On 2009-08-27, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On 2009-08-27, Patrick McCarty wrote: > > Hi, > > > > With latest git master and a clean tree, `make install' is broken for > > me. Attached is the end of the log. > > > > Looking back at the ./autogen.sh output, the Century Schoolbook PFB > > fonts are no

Re: [PATCH] Docs: IR 4 Scheme functions: Improve docstrings.

2009/8/24 Mark Polesky : > how's this then? That's much better, thank you. :) - "Return the definition of @var{name} (a symbol) within" + 2, 0, 0, (SCM context, SCM grob), + "Return the definition of @var{grob} (a symbol) within" You could argue that this should stay

Re: [PATCH] Move ambitus print callback to scheme

2009/8/26 Carl Sorensen : > The patch looks good to me. Cheers. > You code the empty list as (list).  I typically code the empty list as '(). > > It there a preference?  I suspect that we ought to be consistent, although > it's not highly important.  It could be part of the code janitor work, >

Re: `make install' is broken

On 2009-08-27, Patrick McCarty wrote: > Hi, > > With latest git master and a clean tree, `make install' is broken for > me. Attached is the end of the log. > > Looking back at the ./autogen.sh output, the Century Schoolbook PFB > fonts are no longer detected, so I suspect this is why the build i

`make install' is broken

Hi, With latest git master and a clean tree, `make install' is broken for me. Attached is the end of the log. Looking back at the ./autogen.sh output, the Century Schoolbook PFB fonts are no longer detected, so I suspect this is why the build is failing. Normally, they are found in /usr/shar

Re: What's the deal with info documentation images?

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:10:53PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:50:13AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > I believe this only occurs in general.info, correct? via macros > > in Documentation/common-macros.itexi ? > > It occurs in lilypond.

Re: What's the deal with info documentation images?

Graham Percival writes: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:50:13AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> For some time, my info files (after make info, sudo make install-info) >> contain >> >> FIXME: images broken in info >> >> instead of images as before. What happened? Why? Is there a reason, >> or

funky build errors

I have no idea what "monotonic", "needed", "unneeded", and "Expected" mean in this context, but the following messages are certainly amusing. :) I assume that "needed" and "unneeded" aren't actually contradictions... or maybe they are, and that's why the internal error is printed. Invoking "font

Re: What's the deal with info documentation images?

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:50:13AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > For some time, my info files (after make info, sudo make install-info) > contain > > FIXME: images broken in info > > instead of images as before. What happened? Why? Is there a reason, > or a plan to change this again? I be

Re: horizontal offset bug of skip markups

>> After all, it is very easy to place the markup where you want it by >> simply using two spacer notes: >> >> foo = { >> s1 >> \time 7/8 s8^"foobar" s8*6 >> \time 10/8 >> } > > OK, I haven't thought of that solution, thanks. This should perhaps > be added to the documentation. There is a s

What's the deal with info documentation images?

For some time, my info files (after make info, sudo make install-info) contain FIXME: images broken in info instead of images as before. What happened? Why? Is there a reason, or a plan to change this again? -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-de