Re: My make doc is broken

2009-11-17 Thread John Mandereau
Le dimanche 15 novembre 2009 à 23:12 +0100, Frédéric Bron a écrit : did not know that (not in CG): I did the sudo apt-get build-dep lilypond. I have already tex2thml 1.82 (installed manually). redone git pull, make clean, make all, make doc. You forgot make doc-clean in this sequence; in this

Re: Getting start/end moments from an Audio_element_info???

2009-11-17 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Dienstag, 17. November 2009 01:29:49 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 while trying to fix some MIDI issues, I've now run into the problem that in a performer's

[PATCH 2/2] scm/harp-pedals.scm: Fold make-harp-pedal into \harp-pedal markup.

2009-11-17 Thread David Kastrup
The already outcommented problematic \harp-pedal-verbose markup is removed completely. Inlining make-harp-pedal makes it possible to use the property binding mechanism of define-builtin-markup-command in order to minimize inconsistencies between documentation and behavior. ---

[PATCH 1/2] scm/define-markup-commands.scm: remove some unnecessary lookups

2009-11-17 Thread David Kastrup
--- scm/define-markup-commands.scm |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scm/define-markup-commands.scm b/scm/define-markup-commands.scm index 08c24bb..fec895d 100644 --- a/scm/define-markup-commands.scm +++ b/scm/define-markup-commands.scm @@ -732,7 +732,6 @@

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scm/define-markup-commands.scm: remove some unnecessary lookups

2009-11-17 Thread Carl Sorensen
David, I appreciate your work on this. However, I am *not* in favor of moving in this direction to solve the problems you correctly identified. In my mind, the *last* thing we need is another opaque interface in LilyPond, where in the markup command we don't know whether a certain property is

Re: My make doc is broken

2009-11-17 Thread Frédéric Bron
You forgot make doc-clean in this sequence; in this case make -C Documentation/ doc-clean (which avoids rebuilding all snippets with lilypond-book) might be enough to get rid of your error with pdftex. That worked, thanks, Frédéric ___

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scm/define-markup-commands.scm: remove some unnecessary lookups

2009-11-17 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Le 17 nov. 2009 à 19:00, Carl Sorensen a écrit : David, I appreciate your work on this. However, I am *not* in favor of moving in this direction to solve the problems you correctly identified. In my mind, the *last* thing we need is another opaque interface in LilyPond, where in the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] scm/define-markup-commands.scm: remove some unnecessary lookups

2009-11-17 Thread David Kastrup
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes: I appreciate your work on this. However, I am *not* in favor of moving in this direction to solve the problems you correctly identified. In my mind, the *last* thing we need is another opaque interface in LilyPond, where in the markup command we

Re: [PATCH] functional-or returned #f for (functional-or #f #t #f). Fixed.

2009-11-17 Thread Patrick McCarty
On 2009-11-16, David Kastrup wrote: Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com writes: Thanks, pushed. Thanks. The only caller (this is apparently in local namespace) as far as I can see is (define-public (fret-number-tablature-format string context event) (let* ((tuning

Suggestion: Music analysis in Lilypond?

2009-11-17 Thread Ernir ÓskarPálsson
Dear developers, I have recently found Lilypond, and am discovering step by step what a wonderful program it is, and what a quick and simple method to print beautiful music it presents (once I am a little more acquainted with it at least). I have been learning the basics og the program through

Re: Suggestion: Music analysis in Lilypond?

2009-11-17 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
A Chordname like thing would take quite much time to implement and I don't think it is important enough for most of the users to make it happen. Though you can use the Lyrics context for this, because you can write markups as lyric syllables if I'm right. On the lilypond-user list I'm quite

Re: [PATCH] functional-or returned #f for (functional-or #f #t #f). Fixed.

2009-11-17 Thread David Kastrup
Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com writes: On 2009-11-16, David Kastrup wrote: It still suffers from not doing short-circuit evaluation. For readability and efficiency, I'd really prefer replacing '(apply functional-or' with '(any' It looks like Neil removed the is-harmonic binding