It struck me that there are more options for dealing with
the \relative inside \repeat issue. Can someone look over
this to make sure I'm not doing anything sacrililygious?
- Mark
From c3fad3258734b7632d9e7cde7bb414ca07d593fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Polesky
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:39:27PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
It struck me that there are more options for dealing with
the \relative inside \repeat issue. Can someone look over
this to make sure I'm not doing anything sacrililygious?
As usual, I have no insights about the content, but in
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
So, do you have any idea how I can override the header and paper blocks in
a
global init file?
i have copied the whole init.ly to myInit.ly and then added *\include
myPaper.ly* right after the \maininput line (nr. 25 in version 2.13.18)
and then invoked
If a patch is not being actively discussed, please add it to the
tracker. My memory is becoming increasingly faulty; I made the last
two releases with waiting for patches that I told myself I should wait
for (David's lilypond-book patch, and... I can't remember the other
one).
A few months ago,
Hi, from a user perspective, chordmode is unnecessary and restricted.
You can't combine different voices (in particular for adding bass
notes), you can't write chords and bass notes together, you can't put
non-chorded material in between, relative mode is not possible (like for
chord
Hi Graham,
2010/4/28 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
A few months ago, Marek voluteered to record patches. The guideline
is that if there was no activity for 3 days, he'd add it to the
tracker. Marek, are you still willing to do this?
Yes, I am. It is not clear enough in every
Hi Graham et al,
Talking about
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=673
problem with order of \consists
1) Add a sentence about default_bar_line_engraver and
timing_translator (or whatever Werner was talking about on 673). I
know we've already said there order may matter;
WTM?
Based on Werner's specific problem:
Default_bar_line_engraver must come before Timing_translator
This last one is easy to determine by looking at [only] the IR: under
defaultBarType it says This variable is read by [...] Timing translator”.
Actually, it turns out the opposite is
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Graham et al,
Talking about
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=673
problem with order of \consists
1) Add a sentence about default_bar_line_engraver and
timing_translator (or whatever Werner was talking about on
Have you seen this announcement on planet.gnu.org?
Werner
==
GNU Denemo participates in Google's Summer of Code 2010 with one project:
A MusicXML Importer.
Google Summer of Code is a global program that offers student
On 4/28/10 6:41 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Graham et al,
Talking about
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=673
problem with order of \consists
1) Add a sentence about default_bar_line_engraver and
On 4/28/10 5:38 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi, from a user perspective, chordmode is unnecessary and restricted.
You can't combine different voices (in particular for adding bass
notes), you can't write chords and bass notes together, you can't put
non-chorded material in
On 28 April 2010 12:38, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
That's not enough of a distinction to keep it around. Just let normal
music mode accept chords with : notation, and \chordmode is unnecessary
and can be deprecated.
How would you distinguish between chords and tremolos?
\notemode {
Yes, we're doing it. The project includes to make use of whatever lilypond has
to offer with its own importer.
Nils
Denemo
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:28:49 +0200 (CEST)
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Have you seen this announcement on planet.gnu.org?
Werner
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
What effect would this have on the parser?
I have only taken a cursory look so far. When entering chordmode,
something records the chord names and the pitch names, and some grouping
is involved.
I think that I like this idea, even though I didn't at
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
On 28 April 2010 12:38, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
That's not enough of a distinction to keep it around. Just let normal
music mode accept chords with : notation, and \chordmode is unnecessary
and can be deprecated.
How would you distinguish
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 4/28/10 6:41 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
[...]
And if each engraver specifies what engravers it is relying on in a
machine-readable manner (or the respective order in which it wants to be
applied), then Lilypond can actually do the
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 18:02:56 schrieb David Kastrup:
Anyway, here is how I would do this: Chords are much more common than
tremolos, so changing notation for the latter seems like the better
choice.
Oh, really???
In all the classical orchestra scores that I have looked at (and I have
On 28 April 2010 13:41, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
And if each engraver specifies what engravers it is relying on in a
machine-readable manner (or the respective order in which it wants to be
applied), then Lilypond can actually do the required sorting and figure
out a proper order at
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 06:30:29PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
And if each engraver specifies what engravers it is relying on in a
machine-readable manner (or the respective order in which it wants to be
applied), then Lilypond can actually do the
On 28 April 2010 13:36, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Can anyone explain to me what's going on here, and why the comments in IR
appear to suggest the opposite of what's actually happening?
The comment is obsolete: defaultBarType isn't set by any engraver
(it's a user
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 18:02:56 schrieb David Kastrup:
Anyway, here is how I would do this: Chords are much more common than
tremolos, so changing notation for the latter seems like the better
choice.
Oh, really???
Yup.
In all the
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
In Carl's defense, he's horribly busy with end-of-term teaching (which
always penalizes one's real work, namely research) and then has a
conference to deal with. When we deal with open-source volunteer
projects while we have that much stress
2010/4/28 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
\notemode { c4:8 } - two quaver stem tremolo
Ugh. Did not remember that.
Anyway, here is how I would do this: Chords are much more common than
tremolos, so changing notation for the latter seems like the better
choice. There is already verbose syntax
Hi all,
1. I also disagree with David's statement/opinion that chords are much more
common than tremolos. This is certainly true in the pop (e.g., music theatre)
scores I compose/arrange/engrave, but absolutely false in the classical scores
I compose/arrange/engrave. Since I do roughly equal
On 4/28/10 11:15 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
In Carl's defense, he's horribly busy with end-of-term teaching (which
always penalizes one's real work, namely research) and then has a
conference to deal with. When we deal with
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
This is what I was assuming when I wrote my initial response. It
seemed like a good idea for somebody to do, not an offer of somebody
wanting to make the change.
Now, I was wrong in jumping to that assumption and responding
accordingly. But it
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
1. I also disagree with David's statement/opinion that chords are
much more common than tremolos. This is certainly true in the pop
(e.g., music theatre) scores I compose/arrange/engrave, but absolutely
false in the classical scores I
Hi David,
Actually, I find that a rather encouraging statement. I'd have expected
don't change current tremolo syntax. c...@8 has some mnemonic value
(play a quarter at eighths, oops sounds like a time). But I don't
like its look. Would you consider c4/8 an adequate syntax?
c4/8 can be
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 20:15:00 schrieb David Kastrup:
But I don't like its look. Would you consider c4/8 an adequate syntax?
Unfortunately, it's already in use. How would you distinguish the two
currently possible syntaxes:
c2*3/8
c2*3:8
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi David,
Actually, I find that a rather encouraging statement. I'd have expected
don't change current tremolo syntax. c...@8 has some mnemonic value
(play a quarter at eighths, oops sounds like a time). But I don't
like its look.
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2010 20:15:00 schrieb David Kastrup:
But I don't like its look. Would you consider c4/8 an adequate syntax?
Unfortunately, it's already in use. How would you distinguish the two
currently possible syntaxes:
c2*3/8
On 28 April 2010 20:48, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
So I think we can come up with something that is both typographically
simple and mnemonically compelling… How about c4t8 (a c quarter note,
tremolo-d in eighths).
I don't
2010/4/28 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Actually, I find that a rather encouraging statement. I'd have
expected don't change current tremolo syntax. �...@8 has some
mnemonic value (play a quarter at eighths, oops sounds like a time).
But I don't like its look. Would you consider c4/8 an
Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com writes:
2010/4/28 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Actually, I find that a rather encouraging statement. I'd have
expected don't change current tremolo syntax. �...@8 has some
mnemonic value (play a quarter at eighths, oops sounds like a time).
But I don't
http://codereview.appspot.com/970044/diff/1/3
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/970044/diff/1/3#newcode3641
Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely:3641: @ref{Music function
type predicates}.
There's a danger here that users might
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
On 28 April 2010 20:48, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
So I think we can come up with something that is both typographically
simple and mnemonically compelling… How about c4t8 (a c quarter
On 4/27/10 10:49 PM, Nathan Reed nathaniel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Lilypond would attempt to delete the output PDF before overwriting it in
Windows
(but no other platforms). This is unnecessary and causes problems with
certain
PDF viewers, e.g. Sumatra, where the PDF is kept open in a way
On 4/28/10 3:41 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com writes:
2010/4/28 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Actually, I find that a rather encouraging statement. I'd have
expected don't change current tremolo syntax. �...@8 has some
mnemonic value (play a
2010/4/28 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
Does LilyPond use ;? I can't find a use for it in the index, and I
can't think of one.
'?' is used for cautionary accidentals.
I'm not a dev but I think ';' is used to express comments in Scheme
(not in LilyPond however).
Not so easy...
--
Xavier
On 4/28/10 4:21 PM, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/4/28 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
Does LilyPond use ;? I can't find a use for it in the index, and I
can't think of one.
'?' is used for cautionary accidentals.
I'm not a dev but I think ';' is used to express
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 4/28/10 3:41 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
My current approach is what would look best for both tremolo and
chords since the conflict has to be resolved in some manner or
other. If there is a particular good combination that is downwards
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 08:31:11AM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Graham et al,
From the header comments in IR:
-snip lots of good data-
And have you decided whether this should just go in the
@knownissues on that page, or should it be a separate section?
James, once we have an answer,
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 07:15:23PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
When we deal with open-source volunteer
projects while we have that much stress in our lives, we all get
short-tempered. I'm certain that you can think of examples from my
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:45:10AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
c4;7 does not really look anything like a chord. Neither does c4:7, to
be honest. So at best slightly worse.
Trying to channel Han-Wen here, I think the discussion is going in
the wrong direction. It started off with a few
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote:
Current syntax (using colons):
c4:16 d4: e: f: |
g: a: b: c: | % etc.
with \repeat tremolo:
\repeat tremolo 4 c16 \repeat tremolo 4 d16
\repeat tremolo 4 e16 \repeat tremolo 4 f16 |
\repeat tremolo 4 g16
David Kastrup dak at gnu.org writes:
Hi, from a user perspective, chordmode is unnecessary and restricted.
You can't combine different voices (in particular for adding bass
notes), you can't write chords and bass notes together,
You can do this:
\context Voice {
\chordmode {c}
Hello,
I've posted a patch to fix issue 943 from the tracker:
http://codereview.appspot.com/956051/show
I just finished a `make check', and everything seems to be okay.
Please review.
Thanks,
Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
LGTM.
Carl
On 4/28/10 9:04 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've posted a patch to fix issue 943 from the tracker:
http://codereview.appspot.com/956051/show
I just finished a `make check', and everything seems to be okay.
Please review.
Thanks,
Patrick
LGTM.
Thanks,
Patrick
http://codereview.appspot.com/931041/show
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2010/04/19 21:13:14, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 2010/04/19 19:37:12, Carl wrote:
Should the name of this property be something like
ignore-prefatory-material?
Actually, I've had a thought: instead of using booleans, it would
probably make
more sense (and allow finer control) to use a
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:45:10AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
c4;7 does not really look anything like a chord. Neither does c4:7, to
be honest. So at best slightly worse.
Trying to channel Han-Wen here, I think the discussion is going in
52 matches
Mail list logo
