Re: cueDuring question

Am Dienstag, 4. Mai 2010 18:10:42 schrieben Sie: > I have seen in LilyPond's commits that you seem to have worked on the > cueDuring system. [...] > I thought you could maybe help me again... ;D > > I asked 7 months ago a question on -user about something I wanted to do > with \cueDuring but it d

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

I'd be happy with this too. Trevor - Original Message - From: "Mark Polesky" To: "Carl Sorensen" ; "lilypond-devel" ; "Trevor Daniels" Cc: "Graham Percival" ; "James Lowe" Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 6:19 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. Trevor Daniels wrote:

LSR texidocs missing -es suffix

Hi Francisco, Your last set of LSR texidocs included several missing the -es suffix. I've pushed a fix for this, but wondered whether it's worth getting makelsr.py to do this automatically (http://codereview.appspot.com/1105042/show). Cheers, Neil __

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

On 5/4/10 11:19 AM, "Mark Polesky" wrote: > Trevor Daniels wrote: >> A brief description of bar checks in 1.2.2 Working on >> input files would be good. I think bar checks are at >> least as important as a \version statement, which is >> mentioned there. > > I think a better place would be i

Re: make Completion_heads_engraver respect tuplets and scaling

On 3 May 2010 22:42, Benkő Pál wrote: > will the attached do? Thanks, that's fine. I've pushed your changes with a few minor tweaks to the regtest (version number and some formatting nitpicks). Cheers, Neil ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-

Re: LSR texidocs missing -es suffix

2010/5/4 Neil Puttock : > Hi Francisco, > > Your last set of LSR texidocs included several missing the -es suffix. Argh! Thank you. They were all the new snippets, never translated before. >  I've pushed a fix for this, but wondered whether it's worth getting > makelsr.py to do this automatically

copyright question

Are we allowed to quote "Star Wars" without attribution in our docs? http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely;h=5bcd666;hb=HEAD#l85 The change originated here: http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blobdiff;f=Documentation/user/tutorial

Re: Premature evaluation.

Carl Sorensen writes: > On 4/15/10 3:00 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > >> Something like that. Splitting scanning and evaluating into two should >> ensure that the evaluation happens not at a time when the parsing of >> preceding constructs has not yet properly completed. > > I'm sure that a patc

context-example.eps link broken

In the HTML docs, the context-example.eps image doesn't get displayed in LM 3.3.1 "Contexts explained", though it does show up in the PDF. http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/learning-big-page.html#Contexts-explained Also, this worked in 2.12*, but after some minor detective work, I turn

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

I posted a new patch set incorporating most of the requests you guys made. Please have a look at the new one and let me know what you think: http://codereview.appspot.com/1056041 Thanks. - Mark ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@g

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

Hello Trevor Daniels wrote: I'd be happy with this too. Trevor Thanks all. I'll get a patch made some time this evening. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

Hello, sorry to respond to myself. James Lowe wrote: Hello Trevor Daniels wrote: I'd be happy with this too. Trevor Thanks all. I'll get a patch made some time this evening. James I see this has already been done. Sorry for the noise. James _

Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041)

Hi Mark, I think it's an improvement. I've made specific comments inline. Thanks! Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/1056041/diff/11001/12001 File Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/1056041/diff/11001/12001#newcode313 Documentation/learning/

Issue 684: break-align-symbol support

Hi all, Has there been any progress/thinking towards ?? This is a $pon$or-worthy i$$ue for me. =) Thanks, Kieren. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.or

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:19:52AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > Trevor Daniels wrote: > > A brief description of bar checks in 1.2.2 Working on > > input files would be good. I think bar checks are at > > least as important as a \version statement, which is > > mentioned there. > > I think a bett

Re: Premature evaluation.

Carl Sorensen writes: > On 4/15/10 3:00 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > >> >> Something like that. Splitting scanning and evaluating into two >> should ensure that the evaluation happens not at a time when the >> parsing of preceding constructs has not yet properly completed. > > I'm sure that a

Re: copyright question

I guess not. Graham insisted on removing my two bars of "Over the Rainbow". Trevor - Original Message - From: "Mark Polesky" To: "lilypond-devel" Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 6:01 AM Subject: copyright question Are we allowed to quote "Star Wars" without attribution in our docs?

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, May 05, 2010 3:51 PM On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:19:52AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: Trevor Daniels wrote: > A brief description of bar checks in 1.2.2 Working on > input files would be good. I think bar checks are at > least as important as a \version statement,

Re: context-example.eps link broken

Mark Polesky wrote Wednesday, May 05, 2010 7:16 AM In the HTML docs, the context-example.eps image doesn't get displayed in LM 3.3.1 "Contexts explained", though it does show up in the PDF. http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/learning-big-page.html#Contexts-explained Also, this work

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

Graham Percival wrote: > If we need it for 2.3 Songs... which I suppose we should > do... then I'd put it as either the last item inside > 2.1.6 Advanced rhythmic commands, or as a new 2.1.7. A bar check is hardly an "advanced rhythmic command"... - Mark ___

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, May 05, 2010 3:51 PM >> >> or as a new 2.1.7. > > I suppose this would do, as long as the previous examples > didn't include bar checks. The only part that might need them are some of the slur / phrasing sl

Are our PDFs well formed?

Hello. From a while ago, my Evince pdf reader throws this message on console, hundredths of times repeated: Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap It only happens when I open lilypond-made PDFs; other documents do not show that. Not a big problem because they are open and displ

Re: copyright question

Of course we're not allowed to do that, regardless of the attribution. Please change it immediately. Cheers, - Graham On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Mark Polesky wrote: > Are we allowed to quote "Star Wars" without attribution in > our docs? > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=bl

Re: missing code in PDf doc 2.13 NR 4.4.3 Explicit staff and system positioning

Yes; the Spacing chapter was not updated during GDP, so it doesn't follow our doc policy. Sorry, we have no immediate plans to fix this. If you're interested, please volunteer in a month or two when I ask for more doc editors. Cheers, - Graham On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:19 AM, -Eluze wrote: > >

translation problems in website

es *** closing `itemize' (in /home/graham/lilypond/lilypond-git/Documentation/es/included/generating-output.itexi l. 16) fr ** Node following `Manuels' in menu `Community' and in sectionning `Communauté' differ ** `Communauté' doesn't appear in menus

Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041)

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, wrote: > I think it's an improvement.  I've made specific comments inline. sweet mao... you're adding barline checks to every single example?! cis4 ees fisis, aeses | I definitely do **not** like this. cis4 ees fisis, aeses is just fine to read. If there's

Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: > First, if you haven't looked at it yet, you should know that > one direct result of the patch is the increase in length of > many of the examples (vertically).  Graham has already > expressed his dissatisfaction with this, since it increases >

Re: please add patches to the tracker if they're getting lost

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Marek Klein wrote: > Hi Graham, > I would like to ask for some advices concerning tracking of patches: > 1. Is there an easy way to find out if some patch was pushed? When I apply a patch, I try to always reply to the same forum that I saw it (either the public mai

Re: xref to @unnumbered* bug

I'm not certain it's a texi2html bug, or a bug in our texi2html init file, but either way it should be in the tracker. Bug Squad: please add this. Type-build, priority-medium. Cheers, - Graham On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Mark Polesky wrote: > I've noticed that cross-references to unnumber

Re: copyright question

2010/5/5 Mark Polesky : > Are we allowed to quote "Star Wars" without attribution in > our docs? > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely;h=5bcd666;hb=HEAD#l85 > > The change originated here: > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blo

Re: Issue 684: break-align-symbol support

2010/5/5 Kieren MacMillan : > Hi all, > > Has there been any progress/thinking towards >     > ?? > > This is a $pon$or-worthy i$$ue for me.  =) Same for me ! This is the #1 of my "TOP 10" Most Annoying Issues. =p Thanks in advance, Xavie

Re: copyright question

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Mark Polesky wrote: > Are we allowed to quote "Star Wars" without attribution in > our docs? > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely;h=5bcd666;hb=HEAD#l85 Heh. That's funny :-) I think it's highly unlikely th

Re: Are our PDFs well formed?

Sorry, Neil suggested it was related to a libpoppler bug, cf. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-04/msg00255.html Seems to be fixed in last version... Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@

Re: context-example.eps link broken

Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, May 05, 2010 10:27 PM On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:42:07PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: Mark Polesky wrote Wednesday, May 05, 2010 7:16 AM In the HTML docs, the context-example.eps image doesn't get displayed in LM 3.3.1 "Contexts explained", though it does sh

Re: copyright question

On 5/5/10 2:04 PM, "Francisco Vila" wrote: > 2010/5/5 Mark Polesky : >> Are we allowed to quote "Star Wars" without attribution in >> our docs? >> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/usage/lil >> ypond-book.itely;h=5bcd666;hb=HEAD#l85 >> >> The change originate

Re: copyright question

Francisco Vila wrote: > These are multiline text files.  Which text should we > look for? http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely;h=5bcd666;hb=HEAD#l85 85 \begin{lilypond} 86 \relative c' { 87 c2 g'2 \times 2/3 { f8 e d } c'2 g4 88 } 89 \end

Re: context-example.eps link broken

On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 05:42:07PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Mark Polesky wrote Wednesday, May 05, 2010 7:16 AM > >> In the HTML docs, the context-example.eps image doesn't >> get displayed in LM 3.3.1 "Contexts explained", though it >> does show up in the PDF. > > I've tried to fix it more

Re: Are our PDFs well formed?

2010/5/5 Francisco Vila : > Hello.  From a while ago, my Evince pdf reader throws this message on > console, hundredths of times repeated: > > Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap > > It only happens when I open lilypond-made PDFs; other documents do > not show that. > > Not a b

Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041)

On 5/5/10 12:01 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, wrote: >> I think it's an improvement.  I've made specific comments inline. > > sweet mao... you're adding barline checks to every single example?! > > cis4 ees fisis, aeses | > > I definitely do **not** lik

Re: copyright question

On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:04:21PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2010/5/5 Mark Polesky : > > Are we allowed to quote "Star Wars" without attribution in > > our docs? > > http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/usage/lilypond-book.itely;h=5bcd666;hb=HEAD#l85 > > These a

Re: Are our PDFs well formed?

On 5/5/10 11:40 AM, "Francisco Vila" wrote: > Hello. From a while ago, my Evince pdf reader throws this message on > console, hundredths of times repeated: > > Error: Illegal entry in bfrange block in ToUnicode CMap > > It only happens when I open lilypond-made PDFs; other documents do not > s

Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041)

On 5/5/10 6:11 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:04:42PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> >> On 5/5/10 12:01 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, wrote: I think it's an improvement.  I've made specific comments inline. >>> >>> sweet

Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041)

On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:04:42PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > On 5/5/10 12:01 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, wrote: > >> I think it's an improvement.  I've made specific comments inline. > > > > sweet mao... you're adding barline checks to every singl

Re: [frogs] Issue 736041: Lilypond issues success/failure termination message - OK to push?

On 5/5/10 11:03 AM, "Ian Hulin" wrote: > Hi all, > > I put this patch up for review about a month back.  Patrick has given some > feedback and I have implemented his comments.  Could someone have a look and > if it's OK push, please? I didn't see any issues in the patch, except that I was not

Re: Vertical alignment of stuff added to an align-interface

On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 12:43 +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > For fixing the figured bass alignment (i.e. the <4> <6 4> case with extenders > turned onn), I have a problem with the vertical alignment: > > <8 6 4> <8 5 3> > > Should appear as > 8 > 6 5 > 4 3 > > I'm adding the elements

Re: Are our PDFs well formed?

Francisco, This message was discussed in a thread on bug and user (not devel) :) 'error message from PDF viewer' on 18th April. The last message in the thread was On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Graham Percival wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 07:25:29PM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: OK. Here is a t

Critical issue: flag glyphs changing shape

Hi Carl, After looking through the regtest comparison for 2.13.19/2.13.20, I noticed that flag glyphs have changed shape. I posted a tracker issue for this: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1075 I assume this is related to your recent changes to the Metafont code, but I can't