Re: Great Experience!

2010-05-13 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Donnerstag, 13. Mai 2010, um 06:38:42 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > Was the music font lily's feta font? The G-clef is a give-away, > because Feta's is quite unlike any other G-clef. Yes, it was the feta font. I just didn't think of the G-clef, but at some other peculiarities that I have exper

Re: imprecise Taktlinie in german doc (NR)

2010-05-13 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Henning Plumeyer wrote: > >I'm not an active musician, and only decades ago I did do music > >with others (orchestra, choir), so I may be wrong, but I've a strong > >feeling towards `Taktnummern'. It's less ambigous. > > I've been in hundreds of rehearsals

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Karl Hammar
Issue 881: Arpeggios may collide with laissezVibrer ties According to the bug tracker, v2.11.19's output is what to aim for. Neil gave the fix: (define-public (laissez-vibrer::print grob) (ly:tie::print grob)) (then add laissez-vibrer::print to pure-print-callbacks) But he has not done a re

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:06:45AM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: > How do one do a regtest? Regression check; by compiling stuff. > 8.1 Introduction to regression tests > > The regression tests are automatically compiled using special `make' > targets. The output of the regression tests is al

Re: ping Issue 931041: Fix #915 (faulty full-bar rest positioning with clef)

2010-05-13 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:57:05PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 12 May 2010 15:59, Graham Percival wrote: > > Any chance that somebody could step in, make the required changes, and > > get it pushed? > > Is it holding up 2.14? ;) Not by itself; I was sending a reminder because the patch has b

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Karl Hammar
Issue 815: Enhancement: AJAX-powered search auto-completion for the online documentation Issue 1038: more technical website items Theese two seem to be related to the web site, not to the released software. I can understand that it can be critical for the official site, but how can that be cri

Re: Where is the bug tracker?

2010-05-13 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:44:30PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: > Wouldn't it be nice to have a link to the bug tracker from > > http://lilypond.org/devel/ That website is (almost) deprecated; the new website is: http://lilypond.org/website/bug-reports.html Cheers, - Graham __

Re: Great Experience!

2010-05-13 Thread Francisco Vila
2010/5/13 Reinhold Kainhofer : >    "Music engraving by LilyPond 2.12.3 -- www.lilypond.org >     Engraver Gianluca D'Orazio -- his.em...@example.com" Gianluca has been active on the user's list since 2006 to 2008 approx. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com __

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:14:17PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: > *** > Issue 815: Enhancement: AJAX-powered search auto-completion for the online > documentation > Why is this a critical issue for the lilypond release? Because the patch has been hanging around for over a year. My decision on this

Re: imprecise Taktlinie in german doc (NR)

2010-05-13 Thread Henning Plumeyer
Am 12.05.2010, 23:36 Uhr, schrieb Maximilian Albert : Same here. :) Although in a rehearsal one would usually just say something like "in Takt ..." instead of using a construction involving "Taktzahlen". Yes, right. "Conductor: Again from bar five please. Voice from back of viola section: Bu

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 09:41:47AM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: > Issue 815: Enhancement: AJAX-powered search auto-completion for the online > documentation > > Issue 1038: more technical website items > > Theese two seem to be related to the web site, not to the released > software. I can unders

Re: Great Experience!

2010-05-13 Thread Xavier Scheuer
2010/5/13 Reinhold Kainhofer : > > [...] > > And then I got the final page, and there it was: > >    "Music engraving by LilyPond 2.12.3 -- www.lilypond.org >     Engraver Gianluca D'Orazio -- his.em...@example.com" > > WOW! You can't image what it feels like to be surprised like this in > such a

Re: LilyPond 2.13.21 released [correction]

2010-05-13 Thread Paul Scott
On 05/12/2010 12:32 PM, Graham Percival wrote: [the previous announcement stated ".12" instead of ".21"] We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.13.21. This release contains the usual number of bugfixes. However, a number of critical issues still remain, so this release is intended f

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Karl Hammar
Graham: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:06:45AM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: > > How do one do a regtest? > > Regression check; by compiling stuff. > > > 8.1 Introduction to regression tests > > > > The regression tests are automatically compiled using special `make' > > targets. The output of

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 09:11:18PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: > Graham: > > They might be "make baseline-test", followed by applying a patch, > > followed by "make check", but I'm not certain. It's explained > > somewhere in Contributing 2. > > Ok, found something in "3.6.3 Testing LilyPond" (thou

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/13/10 1:11 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote: > Graham: >> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:06:45AM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: >>> How do one do a regtest? >> >> Regression check; by compiling stuff. >> >>> 8.1 Introduction to regression tests >>> >>> The regression tests are automatically compiled

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Karl Hammar
Carl Sorensen: > On 5/13/10 1:11 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote: ... > > But if I already have a known good result from the code tracker, > > how do I compare it with the new result? > > What do you mean by "if I already have a known good result from the code > tracker"? In http://code.google.com/p/lil

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/13/10 2:08 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote: > Carl Sorensen: >> On 5/13/10 1:11 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote: > ... >>> But if I already have a known good result from the code tracker, >>> how do I compare it with the new result? >> >> What do you mean by "if I already have a known good result from the

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Karl Hammar
Carl Sorensen: > On 5/13/10 2:08 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote: ... > > In http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1080 there is a > > grace-start-good.png . ... > IIUC, Neil's patch was already demonstrated to meet issue 1. But issue 2 > was not yet checked. Are you mixing this up with

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/13/10 2:31 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote: > Carl Sorensen: >> On 5/13/10 2:08 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote: > ... >>> In http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1080 there is a >>> grace-start-good.png . > ... >> IIUC, Neil's patch was already demonstrated to meet issue 1. But issue 2 >

Re: completion disturbed by other staff (issue 1082)

2010-05-13 Thread Benkő Pál
hi all, attached a patch fixing the issue. the cause of the problem was note_dur being less than left_to_do_, as noted in the comment I added. the fix itself is the following part: - if (nb.main_part_ && nb < note_dur.get_length ()) + if (nb.main_part_ && nb < left_to_do_) the remaining bit s

Notes on #1036

2010-05-13 Thread Francisco Vila
Hello, Just to prevent that my tiny advances on #1036 get lost, here are my random notes on the issue. Those notes are very messed but after a rest my head will surely understand certain things a bit more clearly. http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/Issue1036 -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) w

Re: completion disturbed by other staff (issue 1082)

2010-05-13 Thread Benkő Pál
hi all, updated the patch fixing the issue and attached an example where the previous version failed. > the cause of the problem was note_dur being > less than left_to_do_, as noted in the comment I added. > > the fix itself is the following part: > -  if (nb.main_part_ && nb < note_dur.get_lengt

Re: Critical issues

2010-05-13 Thread Marc Hohl
Joe Neeman schrieb: On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 22:14 +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: Issue 1080: Regression: bar lines in double bar are positioned too close together "pnorcks" mentions commit 27a4d9354effb09c696925881ec4df007da8a0db as a possible cause. Reverting part of that commit: gives me the atta