On 2010/06/23 01:51:10, Carl wrote:
As far as the indentation on the alist goes, did you reindent the
whole list, or
just the beam-settings part? I ask this, because the sample you gave
has
different indentation for beam-settings than for the time signature.
It's indented from the start o
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> They were approved quite a while ago. An example:
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=680 - now try searching on
> "LyricHyphen".
>
If you search in the lilypond database interface, and put LyricHyphen
in the "text" field and click "enab
"Jonathan Kulp" wrote in message
news:aanlktinj8zljo_an8dbqk-fgybdmdsifab4w19skf...@mail.gmail.com...
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I've added over 10 entries to the LSR, and they don't seem to come up in
> the
> search. Is there a need to rebuild an index, or is it so
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 01:16:56PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> I just approved one snippet, but the other one awaiting approval is
> confusing to me. It's called "How to make \thumb behave like other
> fingering." I can't tell who the author was. The description and
> snippet both seem incomplet
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 06:56:27PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> I've added over 10 entries to the LSR, and they don't seem to come up in
>> the search. Is there a need to rebuild an index, or is it something else
>> going on?
>
> - have th
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I've added over 10 entries to the LSR, and they don't seem to come up in the
> search. Is there a need to rebuild an index, or is it something else going
> on?
>
Snippets require approval sometimes but when checking just now I only
found two
"Graham Percival" wrote in message
news:20100627180420.ga15...@sapphire...
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 06:56:27PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I've added over 10 entries to the LSR, and they don't seem to come up in
the search. Is there a need to rebuild an index, or is it something else
going on?
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 06:56:27PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I've added over 10 entries to the LSR, and they don't seem to come up in
> the search. Is there a need to rebuild an index, or is it something else
> going on?
- have they been approved? that needs to happen.
- it might need to upd
Op zondag 27-06-2010 om 17:05 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
Percival:
> I think it's worth waiting at least a day to see if anybody has
> any suggestions. I mean, if there's a "I'm trying a new version
> of the website, please watch urls containing /website/ closely!"
> check-box on the go
I've added over 10 entries to the LSR, and they don't seem to come up in the
search. Is there a need to rebuild an index, or is it something else going
on?
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lis
Op zondag 27-06-2010 om 18:35 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
Percival:
> I noticed some javascript code on the old webpage about a goal.
> Relevant questions are:
> - do we want to bother with this for the new website?
Grep for urchin, the most important ones are on the download
links thems
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>> I also have a goals defined (a click on the download link), and there
>> is a view that shows you through which path people reach the goal.
>
> I noticed some javascript code on the old webpage about a goal.
> Relevant questions are:
> -
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 02:18:13PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> wrote:
> > Op zondag 27-06-2010 om 14:18 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
> > Percival:
> >
> >> 1) it would be nice if google analytics could tell us info about
> >> how
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 06:56 -0400, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
> Here are some design remarks about what I understood from my work on the
> breaker. Hopefully a sum of a few [dozen?] of mails like this will
> together constitute something to transform into a chapter in the CG...
> >
> >> T
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
> Op zondag 27-06-2010 om 14:18 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
>> 1) it would be nice if google analytics could tell us info about
>> how people use the new website. This may require tweaking
>> something, setting som
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 04:01:19PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op zondag 27-06-2010 om 14:18 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
> > 1) it would be nice if google analytics could tell us info about
> > how people use the new website. This may require tweaking
>
> Well, we'r
Op zondag 27-06-2010 om 14:18 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham
Percival:
> 1) it would be nice if google analytics could tell us info about
> how people use the new website. This may require tweaking
> something, setting some options somewhere, or whatever.
> I know nothing about analytics,
On 6/27/10 3:19 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> carl.d.soren...@gmail.com schrieb:
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/1669041/diff/26001/27003
>> File scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm (right):
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/1669041/diff/26001/27003#newcode91
>> scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm:91: 'harm
Does anybody have previous experience with google analytics and/or
.htaccess redirection? I think we're just about ready to switch
to the new website (at least for a 1-day test), but it's delayed
for two reasons:
1) it would be nice if google analytics could tell us info about
how people use the
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:00:53PM +0200, Mike Solomon wrote:
> 1) How would I create a separate branch?
For your local copy of the source, just do it the normal git way.
There's lots of git tutorials online.
You can't push that branch onto our shared git repo without having
git access, though,
Hi Arno,
Here are some design remarks about what I understood from my work on the
breaker. Hopefully a sum of a few [dozen?] of mails like this will
together constitute something to transform into a chapter in the CG...
Thanks, I've reverted the patch in the meantime. However, the
informati
carl.d.soren...@gmail.com schrieb:
Looks pretty good. I have a few comments about things that seem to be
unnecessarily specific to harmonics.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/1669041/diff/26001/27003
File scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/16690
Hi,
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:20:55 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote:
Thanks, I've reverted the patch in the meantime. However, the
information that you see in annotate-spacing is actually computed after
line-breaking,
ok, so why can't it then be taken into account for page-breaking?
i mean, for me it s
23 matches
Mail list logo
