Re: I screw up git release/unstable

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 02:31:12AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Am Montag, 5. Juli 2010, um 14:10:23 schrieb Graham Percival: > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 12:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > > Graham Percival writes: > > >> Could somebody make release/unstable be exactly the same as master? I

Re: Edits to glossary

"Michael" wrote Tuesday, July 06, 2010 3:07 AM Added German name from "alla breve" and create consistency for "cut time." Thanks! Pushed to git. Trevor ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis

Re: Docs: Music glossay: Update to "brass"

On 02/07/10 19:10, michael wrote: > Do you mean all marching bands. I don't know about American Marching Bands, but certainly for British Brass Bands, you don't find the trumpet there - it's replaced by the cornet. And I think that's also true for Military Bands as well. Cheers, Wol __

Fwd: Music Glossary - 1.64 Concert Pitch

quote: The trombones are a special case: although they are said to be 'in F' (alto or bass) or 'in B-flat' (tenor), this refers to their fundamental note, not to their parts' transposition. (In fact, the trombones' parts are written at concert pitch with an appropriate clef -- alto, tenor or bass

Re: Docs: Music glossay: Update to "brass"

Yes that is correct for the GB. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_band I also think that American Marching bands also allow woodwind whereas you don't see those in British Marching bands that I am aware of. James On 06/07/2010 11:33, Wols Lists wrote: On 02/07/10 19:10, michael wrote:

Re: Docs: Music glossay: Update to "brass"

On 06/07/10 11:59, James Lowe wrote: > Yes that is correct for the GB. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_band > > I also think that American Marching bands also allow woodwind whereas > you don't see those in British Marching bands that I am aware of. You DO see woodwind in British marchin

Organ template in fundamental.itely is incomplete

The organ template given in `fundamental.itely' lacks an important property, namely the limited stretchability of the pedal staff. Without this, the distance of the pedal staff w.r.t. the other two staves can become far too big. I thus suggest that it looks like this: << \new PianoStaff <<

Re: Add independent control of thickness and offset for underline markup (issue1347041)

Reviewers: Neil Puttock, Message: On 2010/05/29 17:51:11, c_sorensen_byu.edu wrote: On 5/29/10 10:10 AM, "Kieren MacMillan" wrote: > To be clear, 'line-thickness and the thickness property of \underline are > [potentially] two different independent val

Music Glossary - 1.64 Concert Pitch

quote: The trombones are a special case: although they are said to be 'in F' (alto or bass) or 'in B-flat' (tenor), this refers to their fundamental note, not to their parts' transposition. (In fact, the trombones' parts are written at concert pitch with an appropriate clef -- alto, tenor or bass.

Re: Docs: Music glossay: Update to "brass"

On 03/07/10 15:57, Graham Percival wrote: > Thanks, pushed. > > Cheers, > - Graham > Just to add a comment - I don't know about American Marching Bands, but in British Brass Bands the trumpet is replaced by the cornet. In Military Bands either instrument is used. Cheers, Wol

Re: Organ template in fundamental.itely is incomplete

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > Unfortunately, this (IMHO absolutely necessary) setup no longer > qualifies the organ template to be part of `fundamental.italy', I > believe... If this setup is truly "absolutely necessary", might it be worth adding to one of the ly/ file

Re: Revised autobeam settings patch (issue1682049)

Carl, you wrote Tuesday, July 06, 2010 3:55 AM OK, I've loaded patch set 2. This patch set makes a clean doc build. Indeed it does. Using the recipe below I now have your patch applied to all binaries, libraries and docs. Thanks. Trevor To make this patch work, you'll need to do the fo

Re: Organ template in fundamental.itely is incomplete

On 6 July 2010 08:52, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > PS: I would *really* like to override just the stretchability by >    saying > >      \override VerticalAxisGroup >                  #'next-staff-spacing #'stretchability = #5 > >    instead of specifying all properties of `next-staff-spacing'.  Is >

Re: Revised autobeam settings patch (issue1682049)

Hi Carl, This looks really good. A few comments: The regtests fail on beam-beat-grouping.ly, since it uses \setBeatGrouping to set the obsolete property beamSettings. The display method for \time is broken due to using ApplyContext (this is the same problem as issue 765 for \ottava, which I'll

Re: Organ template in fundamental.itely is incomplete

>> PS: I would *really* like to override just the stretchability by >>    saying >> >>      \override VerticalAxisGroup >>                  #'next-staff-spacing #'stretchability = #5 >> >>    instead of specifying all properties of `next-staff-spacing'.  Is >>    this already possible?  Otherwise,

Re: Organ template in fundamental.itely is incomplete

>> Unfortunately, this (IMHO absolutely necessary) setup no longer >> qualifies the organ template to be part of `fundamental.italy', I >> believe... > > If this setup is truly "absolutely necessary", might it be worth > adding to one of the ly/ files? \organSpacing, or something like > that? W

Re: Revised autobeam settings patch (issue1682049)

On 2010/07/07 00:52:10, Neil Puttock wrote: Hi Carl, This looks really good. Thanks! The regtests fail on beam-beat-grouping.ly, since it uses \setBeatGrouping to set the obsolete property beamSettings. Dang! I know I fixed that once, but maybe I did it after running makelsr.py, and I

Re: Revised autobeam settings patch (issue1682049)

I've responded to each of Neil's comments below. I'll post another patch set once I've proven that the regtests and the docs build properly. THanks, Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/1682049/diff/3035/9004 File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/168