Dear list,
in the following example i would have hoped for two whole-bar beams, but
only the second is printed like i expected.
\version 2.13.28
{
\overrideBeamSettings #'Staff #'(5 . 16) #'end
#'((* . (1))
)
\time 5/16 \times 10/9{c16 c16. c16 c16}
Arno Waschk wrote:
Dear list,
in the following example i would have hoped for two whole-bar beams, but
only the second is printed like i expected.
\version 2.13.28
{
\overrideBeamSettings #'Staff #'(5 . 16) #'end
#'((* . (1))
)
\time 5/16 \times 10/9{c16
On 7/8/10 1:51 AM, Arno Waschk hamama...@gmx.de wrote:
Dear list,
in the following example i would have hoped for two whole-bar beams, but
only the second is printed like i expected.
\version 2.13.28
{
\overrideBeamSettings #'Staff #'(5 . 16) #'end
#'((* . (1))
)
Hello,
I noticed an .ly file called
'conducting-signs,-measure-grouping-signs.ly'
In my most recent download of the source.
The snippet text in rhythms.itely matches
@lilypondfile[verbatim,lilyquote,ragged-right,texidoc,doctitle]
{conducting-signs,-measure-grouping-signs.ly}
I didn't
On 7/8/10 9:58 AM, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Hello,
I noticed an .ly file called
'conducting-signs,-measure-grouping-signs.ly'
In my most recent download of the source.
The snippet text in rhythms.itely matches
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:16:47AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 7/8/10 9:58 AM, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
'conducting-signs,-measure-grouping-signs.ly'
@lilypondfile[verbatim,lilyquote,ragged-right,texidoc,doctitle]
{conducting-signs,-measure-grouping-signs.ly}
On 08/07/2010 18:07, Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:16:47AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 7/8/10 9:58 AM, James Lowejames.l...@datacore.com wrote:
'conducting-signs,-measure-grouping-signs.ly'
@lilypondfile[verbatim,lilyquote,ragged-right,texidoc,doctitle]
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:33:24PM +0100, James Lowe wrote:
On 08/07/2010 18:07, Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:16:47AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
This filename has been part of the tree for more than a year, so, while it
could potentially cause problems, it hasn't in the
On 8 July 2010 18:43, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Then please rename it. Patch to Trevor... no, wait, we'll need to
regnerate the *.snippet-list files.
Arrgh, please no! :)
It shadows the snippet in LSR, which has the same filename: LSR
doesn't strip commas. The LSR
Hi Joe,
Here's another one:
130 for (vsize i = 0; i rests.size (); i++)
131 {
132 Grob *r = Note_column::get_rest (rests[i]);
133
134 Direction d = get_grob_direction (r);
135 if (d)
136 ordered_rests[d].push_back (rests[i]);
162
Hello all,
As per earlier discussion on the -user list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg51183.html
... I finally managed to put some time and mental energy towards
chromatic transposition, in particular, the naturalizeMusic function
from the LSR.
I've attached a draft
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:49:09PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 8 July 2010 18:43, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Then please rename it. Patch to Trevor... no, wait, we'll need to
regnerate the *.snippet-list files.
It shadows the snippet in LSR, which has the same
On 8 July 2010 19:47, Joseph Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
(Example: take the music of bb. 9-10 in the sample music, and
put it through the _original_ naturalizeMusic function. You get
left with a g-double-flat instead of an f-natural.)
You're using 2.12,
On 07/08/2010 10:25 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 8 July 2010 19:47, Joseph Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
(Example: take the music of bb. 9-10 in the sample music, and
put it through the _original_ naturalizeMusic function. You get
left with a g-double-flat
On 8 July 2010 22:06, Joseph Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 07/08/2010 10:25 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
('original' and 'revised' refer to the original and my version of
naturalizeMusic?)
Yes.
So ... other than that it might be nice to have the snippet for 2.12, is
there any
On 07/09/2010 12:09 AM, Neil Puttock wrote:
That sounds like a useful enhancement, except that it would be a music
property rather than a context property, since transposition happens
before translation.
Can you explain more precisely ... ? This seems like something I should
understand very
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
quote:
The trombones are a special case: although they are said to be 'in F'
(alto or bass) or 'in B-flat' (tenor), this refers to their fundamental
note, not to their parts' transposition. (In fact, the trombones' parts
are
On 2 July 2010 23:47, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
If you accept this patch, I will also provide one to ban ly:parser-parse-file
in
times that it segfaults.
That sounds like a fair deal. :)
The patch looks fine to me (there are just a few minor style nits
which can be
On 2010/07/02 15:55:27, Carl wrote:
I'm not sure where we are on this patch; we've had some philosophical
discussion
whose end I'm not sure I understand.
Is this OK to push?
LGTM, save a few style nitpicks.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1345041/show
On 2010/06/29 23:58:07, Neil Puttock wrote:
Do you think the property name's OK though? I agree with Carl it
could be a bit
more descriptive, but then there's also the need to keep verbosity to
a minimum.
Yes, I think the property name is fine.
-Patrick
On 07/07/2010 04:06 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/07/10 19:06, Paul Scott wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
quote:
The trombones are a special case: although they are said to be 'in F'
(alto or bass) or 'in B-flat' (tenor), this refers to their fundamental
I've got a draft of accordion push and pull symbols. Please let me know
what you think of them.
Thanks,
Carl
accpushpull.pdf
Description: accpushpull.pdf
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Paul == Paul Scott waterho...@ultrasw.com writes:
Paul On 07/07/2010 04:06 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
On 07/07/10 19:06, Paul Scott wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
Paul The lowest note on a woodwind is a fundamental. It's just not
Paul directly related to how
23 matches
Mail list logo
