Optimizations for pure-height approximations. (issue1817045)

http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/1/4 File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/1/4#newcode1059 scm/define-grob-properties.scm:1059: Since the properties in this file are sorted alphabetically, this is the wrong place... http://codereview.a

How do I add new noteheads to lilypond?

Hello- I've been working on and off over the last couple years at getting Lilypond to typeset twinline notation (among others) for the music notation project. Kevin Dalley's abandoned patches thankfully did most of the heavy lifting, but the noteheads he used were never posted. I believe I now k

Re: scheme night-mare...

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Arno Waschk wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:21:28 +0200, Joe Neeman > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Arno Waschk wrote: >> >> >>> seems this is something which is new (i tried as well 2.13.26). >>> it just meens that the swap partition is full... >

Let's speed up lilypond! was: scheme night-mare...

resent since topic was off-topic... On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:34:40 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:21:28 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Arno Waschk wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:27:53 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:53:21

Re: scheme night-mare...

On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:21:28 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Arno Waschk wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:27:53 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:53:21 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: Hi Joe, O

Re: scheme night-mare...

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Arno Waschk wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:27:53 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:53:21 +0200, Joe Neeman >> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Neil Puttock >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Joe, On 13 July 2010 02:18, Joe Neema

Re: Can't get a patch through because of weekly development releases.

Carl Sorensen writes: > The version number of a build from the current git will be higher than > the last release version. This particular patch uses changes in .cc > code, so it needs to be rebuilt, and hence will always be a version > ahead of the current git. That sounds like the version num

Re: Can't get a patch through because of weekly development releases.

On 7/14/10 11:12 AM, "Joe Neeman" wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> >> >> >> On 7/14/10 4:21 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: >> Reinhold Kainhofer writes: >> Am Mittwoch, 14. Juli 2010, um 08:47:17 schrieb David Kastrup: Graham Percival w

Re: Can't get a patch through because of weekly development releases.

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > > On 7/14/10 4:21 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > > > Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > > > >> Am Mittwoch, 14. Juli 2010, um 08:47:17 schrieb David Kastrup: > >>> Graham Percival writes: > But if you're working on a separate branch (as

Re: scheme night-mare...

On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:27:53 +0200, Arno Waschk wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:53:21 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: Hi Joe, On 13 July 2010 02:18, Joe Neeman wrote: > Does the attached patch help? For me, it reduces dramatically the > n

'translation' of 'bound' and 'column' with regard to hairpins (for non-developers)

Hello, I am currently trying to close out Issue 989. And one of the reg tests says -- Hairpins extend to the extremes of the bound if there is no adjacent hairpin or dynamic-text. If there is, the hairpin extends to the center of the column or the bound of the text respectively -- Can someone

Re: Can't get a patch through because of weekly development releases.

On 7/14/10 2:46 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:47:17AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> Graham Percival writes: >> >>> If you have the patch as a single file, then (in vim) it would be >>> %s/2.13.28/2.13.29/g >>> >>> But if you're working on a separate branch (as

Re: "patch" for underline function

On 7/14/10 4:15 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: >> Kieren still lacks a git setup, though, and this very patch has only >> been mentioned on the -devel list and the bug tracker, so I guess it's a >> special case. > > ah, ok. I m

Re: Can't get a patch through because of weekly development releases.

On 7/14/10 4:21 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: > Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > >> Am Mittwoch, 14. Juli 2010, um 08:47:17 schrieb David Kastrup: >>> Graham Percival writes: But if you're working on a separate branch (as is right and proper for a major change), then I'm not certain how

Re: "patch" for underline function

On 2010-07-14 12:34, Graham Percival wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: Or does this run in the virtual box under MacOS now? Lilybuntu is a virtual machine. It can be run in vmware or virtualbox on top of linux, windows, or macos. We've had two new docume

Re: scheme night-mare...

On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:53:21 +0200, Joe Neeman wrote: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: Hi Joe, On 13 July 2010 02:18, Joe Neeman wrote: > Does the attached patch help? For me, it reduces dramatically the > number of times that combine_pure_heights (and also ly_scm2in

Re: "patch" for underline function

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: > Kieren still lacks a git setup, though, and this very patch has only > been mentioned on the -devel list and the bug tracker, so I guess it's a > special case. ah, ok. I missed that. > I can prepare a proper git patch and pos

Re: "patch" for underline function

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:21:56PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: > On 2010-07-14 12:15, Graham Percival wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: >>> Regarding your new entry in the tracker about how to comment: Rietveld >>> looks like the best option for reviews,

Re: Can't get a patch through because of weekly development releases.

Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > Am Mittwoch, 14. Juli 2010, um 08:47:17 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Graham Percival writes: >> > But if you're working on a separate branch (as is right and proper >> > for a major change), then I'm not certain how to go about it. I'm >> > looking forward to opinions.

Re: "patch" for underline function

On 2010-07-14 12:15, Graham Percival wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: Regarding your new entry in the tracker about how to comment: Rietveld looks like the best option for reviews, but I dislike to force everybody to use it. I'm not sure how many develope

Re: Can't get a patch through because of weekly development releases.

Am Mittwoch, 14. Juli 2010, um 08:47:17 schrieb David Kastrup: > Graham Percival writes: > > But if you're working on a separate branch (as is right and proper > > for a major change), then I'm not certain how to go about it. I'm > > looking forward to opinions. > > I don't see a problem here.

Re: "patch" for underline function

On 2010-07-14 10:42, Graham Percival wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:34:01AM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: @ Graham: W.r.t. , what's a non-developer supposed to do with his review? Post on -devel? Comment in the issue des

Re: Can't get a patch through because of weekly development releases.

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:47:17AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > > If you have the patch as a single file, then (in vim) it would be > > %s/2.13.28/2.13.29/g > > > > But if you're working on a separate branch (as is right and proper > > for a major change), then I'm

Re: "patch" for underline function

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:34:01AM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: > [This mail is essentially copied from > to have it on > -devel...] > > @ Graham: W.r.t. > , > w

Re: "patch" for underline function

On 2010-05-25 14:33, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi all, I want to have independent control of the thickness and offset of the underline markup function -- unfortunately, they are currently linked (i.e., the offset is a multiple of the thickness). [...] [This mail is essentially copied from

Re: Add \path markup command, and use it for \eyeglasses. (issue1730044)

Op dinsdag 13-07-2010 om 21:49 uur [tijdzone +], schreef pnor...@gmail.com: > Jan: I like your idea about using a separate module to evaluate the > various commands, though IIUC, this would be duplicating the work done > by the backend "path" procedures in output-ps.scm and output-svg.scm, > s