On 2010/07/27 14:14:12, janneke-list_xs4all.nl wrote:
I'm "waiting" for an ack.
From whom?
http://codereview.appspot.com/1579041/show
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2010/08/10 19:00:01, Ian Hulin wrote:
Errm, unless you're using an unpatched, vanilla lily.scm from git you
won't see it because the handler will already be defined in
ergonomic-simple-format.
It doesn't make any difference for me. profile-property-access.ly uses
(ice-9 format) unless it's
Hi Neil,
On 09/08/10 22:34, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010/08/09 20:01:10, Ian Hulin wrote:
Presumably this means make a parallel change to
Documentation/snippets/clip-systems.ly? OK.
snippets/new/clip-systems.ly
then run makelsr.py to update snippets/clip-systems.ly:
scripts/auxiliar/
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 04:49:24PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Eluze wrote Tuesday, August 10, 2010 2:54 PM
>
>> if you specify a folder name as output option the output will be
>> directed to
>> that folder and the name of the file is preserved
> I don't know, but I'm reluctant to cement th
Eluze wrote Tuesday, August 10, 2010 2:54 PM
happenstance or intention?
I don't know, but I'm reluctant to cement this change
into the docs until someone confirms it is working as
intended.
Looks useful though. Thanks for pointing it out.
if you specify a folder name as output option the o
happenstance or intention?
if you specify a folder name as output option the output will be directed to
that folder and the name of the file is preserved
so i suggest the following change/addition - or similar - in the
application usage manual:
1.2 Command-line usage
Command line options for l
On 8/10/10 2:52 AM, "Xavier Scheuer" wrote:
> Hi Carl!
>
> First of all thank you for your formidable work on the new autobeaming,
> it seems really powerful and the ideas to configure it more "logical"
> (although I must confess, I'm still not totally used to all these
> changes)!
>
> I wou
Hi Carl!
First of all thank you for your formidable work on the new autobeaming,
it seems really powerful and the ideas to configure it more "logical"
(although I must confess, I'm still not totally used to all these
changes)!
I would just like to know if it is currently possible to define rules
