Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
>> I can work on this on September 8 - is this too late?
>
> We will likely have the first alpha of 2.14 before then, which will
> bring more visibility from users, and they might start using the
> current syntax.
On 2010/07/28 14:09:54, c_sorensen_byu.edu wrote:
>> On 2010/07/27 20:16:58, Neil Puttock wrote:
>>> user-include ?
>> How about custom-definitions or user-definitions (no, sounds too
much
>> like it defines users)?
> How about --user-startup or --custom-startup?
How about --extra-init, or --in
A few days ago, I did a security update on ubuntu 9.04 (the current
lilypond build machine). I'm not certain if I did any security
updates since early July -- I was mostly away for this period.
I'm now seeing tons of failed files in the doc build; I'm not certain
if *any* of them are passing. I
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> I can work on this on September 8 - is this too late?
We will likely have the first alpha of 2.14 before then, which will
bring more visibility from users, and they might start using the
current syntax. It's not the end of the world if y
Hey all,
I can work on this on September 8 - is this too late?
David - I see what you mean regarding the covered holes, and I will make
that happen. I think that I see what you mean regarding the property list
(ie each requested hole has properties such as "coveredness", "ring?"), but
if y
Benjamin Peterson writes:
> 061fe4a0a6dc06f2d5374f152173cdaac883575f add docs for woodwind diagrams to a
> new
> section, "Specialist notation -> winds." I think at least a mention of them
> should be in "Common notation for wind instruments" where there's already a
> discussion of fingering mar
