collision between beams and grace notes

2011-02-08 Thread Werner LEMBERG
[git commit cfe87695] \version "2.13.49" \header { texidoc = " The beaming algorithm should handle collisions between beams and grace notes too. Here is a counterexample. " } \relative c' { e'8[ f e \grace { f,16[ a] } e'8] } <>___ lilypond-devel

Re: collision between beams and grace notes

2011-02-08 Thread Mike Solomon
On Feb 7, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > [git commit cfe87695] > > > \version "2.13.49" > > \header { texidoc = " > The beaming algorithm should handle collisions between beams and > grace notes too. > > Here is a counterexample. > " } > > \relative c' { > e'8[ f e \grace { f,16[

Re: collision between beams and grace notes

2011-02-08 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> The current beaming collision algorithm I'm working on produces the > attached file as output. Nice! Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

PATCHES: 48-hour notice for beat slashes and part_combine state

2011-02-08 Thread Graham Percival
Thurs, 10 Feb, 6pm. Better support for beat slashes (multi-slash & mixed duration). http://codereview.appspot.com/212048/ PartCombine: Keep track of the state in the Part_combine_engraver http://codereview.appspot.com/3334043/ Cheers, - Graham ___ lil

Re: Link checker

2011-02-08 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung - > Do you know what happened with http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/linkdoc ? > See > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1469 I've now set up the cronjob on my office machine again (lilypond and the whole documentation is now rebuilt every nigh

Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed

2011-02-08 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:16:42PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > My workflow is that I make several commits (i.e. I don't amend) in each > feature branch. But before actually merging back to master (or pushing to the > server), I do a > > git rebase -i origin/master +1 My personal workfl

Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed

2011-02-08 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:05:37PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > On 2/6/11 4:44 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote: > > > git status (everything looks fine, 3 files i've changed are listed) > > git diff HEAD (i see something resembling patch file) > > git commit -a (it asked me for message - i'm

Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed

2011-02-08 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:54:17PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > On 2/6/11 7:10 AM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote: > > > Now i see that there is a warning about vim, only it's somewhere else > > (CG 3.3.4 "commit messages"), not in "uploading patch for review". > > Sorry for whining. > > No problem.

Re: fine-tuning new flags - feedback needed

2011-02-08 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 2/8/11 3:00 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:05:37PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> >> On 2/6/11 4:44 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote: >> >>> git status (everything looks fine, 3 files i've changed are listed) >>> git diff HEAD (i see something resembling patch fil

Re: shortened stems and flags (issue4134041)

2011-02-08 Thread lemniskata . bernoullego
New patch set uploaded. Some more stylistic changes (hopefully for the better). There are 3 files in this patch (although only stem.cc has changed), because i broke something and had to delete my git repository, download it again and make changes again. Sorry for that. http://codereview.appspot.c