Janek Warchoł wrote Wednesday, March 02, 2011 8:53 PM
2011/3/1 Trevor Daniels
Yes, they are longer, but the stems on the full-size notes look
too long
in this context to my eye.
I've attached the output from 2.13.52.
In my opinion it is ok.
It's OK; just not optimum when isolated like
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
>
> > On Mar 2, 2011, at 7:23 AM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> I haven't had time to look at this carefully, but I'll have closer look
> >> later. What I don't understand, though, is why t
Le 2 mars 2011 à 08:08, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Friday, 9am UK time.
>
>
> Fret diagram fixes
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4176056/
I'm still taking care of this one... but my pace regarding LilyPond
dev is just really slow.
___
lilypond-deve
Indents fixed.
Sorry it took so long - i had limited access to my lilydev-enabled
machine.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4236043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2011/3/1 Trevor Daniels
>
> Janek Warchoł wrote Monday, February 28, 2011 1:02 PM
>
>> 2011/2/28 Trevor Daniels
>>
>>> This commit causes many changes to the reg tests due to the small
>>> increase in some of the stems that protrude beyond the staff.
>>> Virtually all of the changes look good, bu
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> The diff says something like
>
> {
> Real yshift = config->y[LEFT] - 0.5 * staff_space;
> - if (abs (round(yshift) - yshift) < 0.01 * staff_space)
> + if (abs ((int)(yshift + 0.5) - yshift) < 0.01 * staff_space)
> co
Trevor Daniels treda.co.uk> writes:
> > lyrics-bar.png -
>
> This is OK. The "no" is part of the lyrics to the lower staff,
> "no Bar_Engraver_Bar_Engraver_Bar_Engraver" :)
>
> It still shows the bar being pushed out to accommodate the
> long syllable, as it should.
>
LilyPond passes what tha
- Original Message -
From: "Neil Puttock"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: 13.52 regtests
On 2 March 2011 16:48, Phil Holmes wrote:
> full-measure-rest-fermata.ly - this shows that markup attached to a note
> is
> kept within the music, bu
On 2 March 2011 16:48, Phil Holmes wrote:
> full-measure-rest-fermata.ly - this shows that markup attached to a note is
> kept within the music, but not markup attached to a FMR. I'd suggest this
> is a bug, although not a regression. Anyone other views?
Markup attached to a full-bar rest is a
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message
news:iklsd6$r1v$1...@dough.gmane.org...
lyrics-bar.png - the music now breaks over the line to accommodate
the text
(which is OK), but see the "no" now sitting in the stave. Anyone
know
what's going on here?
This is OK. The "no" is part of the lyrics to t
On Mar 2, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2011, at 7:23 AM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I haven't had time to look at this carefully, but I'll have closer look
>> later. What I don't understand, though, is why this problem needs such
>> extensive changes. If it's just a matt
On Mar 2, 2011, at 7:23 AM, joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
> I haven't had time to look at this carefully, but I'll have closer look
> later. What I don't understand, though, is why this problem needs such
> extensive changes. If it's just a matter of preventing repeated
> footnotes at the beginning/e
I haven't had time to look at this carefully, but I'll have closer look
later. What I don't understand, though, is why this problem needs such
extensive changes. If it's just a matter of preventing repeated
footnotes at the beginning/end of a line, it should be enough to examine
footnote->get_colu
On Mar 1, 2011, at 10:19 PM, pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I have a quick comment for you below.
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4213042/diff/24035/scm/define-stencil-commands.scm
> File scm/define-stencil-commands.scm (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot
14 matches
Mail list logo
