Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>
> lyrics-bar.png - the music now breaks over the line to accommodate the text
> mensural-ligatures.ly - one of the staves now disappears over the edge of
> the page.
These two tests suffered somewhat from making keep-inside-line = ##t, so I
adjusted to c
Boris,
This is the last remaining critical bug preventing version 2.14.
I applied the suggestions above to your patch, resulting in
http://codereview.appspot.com/4253061/
Would you either comment there, or adopt the revisions,
whichever is appropriate given the amount of time you can give to
Li
On 2011/03/06 12:13:15, Reinhold wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode871
Doc
On 3/6/11 2:44 AM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
> 2011/3/6 Carl Sorensen :
>>
>>> bars 8,9,11: ugly slurs, bad placement in bar 8
>>
>> I agree with 9 and 11 having ugly slurs -- too sharply peaked.
>>
>> I've changed the slur scoring so that it doesn't try to move slurs away from
>> staff lines.
On 7 March 2011 00:17, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> Blech...
Couldn't have put it better myself. ;)
Try the attached patch. I can't test it properly until tomorrow
evening, but it doesn't appear to break anything.
Cheers,
Neil
From 920eedbe36b465e8a17b30d6b41474a73197f217 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
Blech...
http://codereview.appspot.com/4253059
But it works!
Cheers,
MS___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Mar 6, 2011, at 19:04, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 6 March 2011 23:30, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>> It's dirt simple, and perhaps breaks other things, but it works.
>
> Judging by the original commit
> (http://repo.or.cz/w/lilypond/mirror.git/commit/2f47e632d869f7adfffa656b79a6f76cfa31a11e?f
On 6 March 2011 23:30, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> It's dirt simple, and perhaps breaks other things, but it works.
Judging by the original commit
(http://repo.or.cz/w/lilypond/mirror.git/commit/2f47e632d869f7adfffa656b79a6f76cfa31a11e?f=lily/staff-symbol.cc),
it will break this snippet:
http
Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
Message:
Thanks Neil!
New patch set uploaded.
Cheers,
Mike
http://codereview.appspot.com/4254055/diff/1/lily/balloon.cc
File lily/balloon.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4254055/diff/1/lily/balloon.cc#newcode38
lily/balloon.cc:38: static SCM internal_balloo
http://codereview.appspot.com/4254055/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm
File scm/define-grobs.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4254055/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode180
scm/define-grobs.scm:180: (annotation-balloon . #f)
On 2011/03/06 23:35:28, Neil Puttock wrote:
remove
Oops, I mean
Hi Mike,
Just a few minor nitpicks for you.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/4254055/diff/1/lily/balloon.cc
File lily/balloon.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4254055/diff/1/lily/balloon.cc#newcode38
lily/balloon.cc:38: static SCM internal_balloon_print (Grob *me, Grob
*p,
It's dirt simple, and perhaps breaks other things, but it works.
If someone could run the reg-tests, I'd be much obliged!
It's also possible to include the deleted code but gate it via some sorta
boolean grob property set for the StaffSymbol, but I wouldn't know what to call
this property.
http
All looking pretty good. A number have changed since it looks like lyrics
are placed slightly further from the staff than before - this pushes lower
staves down. completion-heads-factor.ly has had some more notes added to
the test. page-spacing-staff-group-nested.ly now sets the nested staves
http://codereview.appspot.com/4254055
This implements the annotation part. No real new stuff, but smaller and easier
to digest.
Let me know what you think!
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
On 6 March 2011 17:33, David Kastrup wrote:
> James Lowe writes:
>
>> The google tracker issue does work in as much as the main point of this is
>> to split the Lilypond score into 'lines' and each line is exported to an
>> EPS file - this bit is done by Lilypond (IIR) you can then manually put
>
On Mar 6, 2011, at 12:33, David Kastrup wrote:
> James Lowe writes:
>
>> The google tracker issue does work in as much as the main point of this is
>> to split the Lilypond score into 'lines' and each line is exported to an
>> EPS file - this bit is done by Lilypond (IIR) you can then manually
James Lowe writes:
> The google tracker issue does work in as much as the main point of this is
> to split the Lilypond score into 'lines' and each line is exported to an
> EPS file - this bit is done by Lilypond (IIR) you can then manually put
> each line into a video using most standard video e
The google tracker issue does work in as much as the main point of this is
to split the Lilypond score into 'lines' and each line is exported to an
EPS file - this bit is done by Lilypond (IIR) you can then manually put
each line into a video using most standard video editing software, this
bit is
Hey all,
In the commit message about the footnote push, you'll see a line about TEST
ONLY. What I mean here is that it is only 1/2 of the feature and thus should
not yet be documented or considered complete (as discussed in previous emails).
There is nothing test-ish about the implementation, ho
On Mar 5, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 5 March 2011 14:38, Mike Solomon wrote:
>
>> Done - thanks for bearing with me as I learn about break-visibility. It is
>> a corner of the code that I never had to deal with directly, so I'm still
>> getting my sea legs.
>
> I suggest you
Hey all,
A potential fix for issue 1504 is posted here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/
I haven't had time to run the regtests yet (traveling), but will in the next
few days. There is, however, an additional regtest (see patch) that shows this
patch in action.
Lemme know what you thin
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 03:55:50PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> But the question is how to get this kind of thing out of Lilypond and
> into a video stream.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=965
If you can make a dvd, then you can certainly make a plain old
video.
(I haven't
Here is an example of what I mean:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMBJowDdFq4>
This is organized as a vertically scrolling endless paper strip with a
running cursor.
It would also be conceivable to just have a horizontally scrolling
endless staffgroup.
But the question is how to get this kind
Hi,
how fast would be LilyPond if we turned off collision detecting,
optical spacing, line breaking, beam quanting and sloping, slur
shaping, etc etc etc - basically everything except placing symbols on
paper in one infinately long system?
I thought this can be checked by remowing all possible eng
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode871
Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely:871:
Tues, 9am.
Cleaning Feta flags code
http://codereview.appspot.com/4236043/
One-line fix for key signatures should be inherited by all Voices
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=897
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilyp
wrote Saturday, March 05, 2011 11:05 PM
On Mar 5, 2011, at 17:33, Janek Warchoł
wrote:
2011/3/5 Trevor Daniels :
When I suggested investigating the automatic beaming I didn't
mean messing with the code. But there are a number of
parameters
in the #'details property of beam which might
Janek Warchoł wrote Sunday, March 06, 2011 1:54 AM
I was curious too, so i wrote it down.
Indeed it looks like he used non-default layout (by default Lily
uses
3 systems), but i won't call it non-optimal. In my opinion fitting
this music in two systems is perfectly reasonable here (and maybe
LGTM, apart from a minor nitpick in original text
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4188056/diff/22001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#oldcode8
29 matches
Mail list logo
