Il giorno mar, 29/03/2011 alle 22.41 +0200, Valentin Villenave ha
scritto:
What's the confusion? That Werner, Han-Wen and I are presented as
musicians?
Not exactly what I had in mind :) Check this out:
Like MuseScore, [LilyPond] was invented by musicians Han-Wen Nienhuys
and Jan
Draft #3 posted.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273125/diff/1002/Documentation/changes.tely
File Documentation/changes.tely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4273125/diff/1002/Documentation/changes.tely#newcode65
Documentation/changes.tely:65: Single beat repeats for sixteenth or
shorter
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Here's a proposed fix for issue 1579.
I'm not sure if the extended search for a context to
provide lyric rhythms is actually required, especially as
the search sometimes returns inappropriate contexts, but
in case it is I've simply hidden it behind a new context
property
On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:30 AM, hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
lgtm
http://codereview.appspot.com/4290069/diff/11001/lily/beam-collision-engraver.cc
File lily/beam-collision-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4290069/diff/11001/lily/beam-collision-engraver.cc#newcode64
http://codereview.appspot.com/4323045/diff/1/ly/engraver-init.ly
File ly/engraver-init.ly (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4323045/diff/1/ly/engraver-init.ly#oldcode424
ly/engraver-init.ly:424: instrumentName = #'()
I'm missing something from the commit message -- why are you removing
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 06:20:34PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
URL:http://codereview.appspot.com/4311041
Please improve/discuss. This looks totally insane but does not actually
change the existing absurd realities for single-digit unsigned numbers.
Thanks added as
Hi,
In the future, please send messages like this to -devel. I don't
think everyone on -user wants to see these nasty linker errors...
On 2011-03-29, Bernardo Barros wrote:
I think we might need some little changes to compile lilypond with gcc 4.
I'm getting the following errors with latest
