Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041)

2011-06-17 Thread mtsolo
Good work! A few comments below. http://codereview.appspot.com/4609041/diff/12001/scm/define-grobs.scm File scm/define-grobs.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4609041/diff/12001/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode141 scm/define-grobs.scm:141: (woot . 1) This seems like 1337 $p34k - I have ne

RE: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041)

2011-06-17 Thread James Lowe
Hello From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Carl Sorensen [c_soren...@byu.edu] Sent: 17 June 2011 00:25 To: lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com; tdanielsmu...@googlem

Re: separating flags from noteheads in font (issue4273119)

2011-06-17 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 16.06.2011 23:19, schrieb Carl Sorensen: On 6/16/11 2:57 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote: 2011/6/14 Marc Hohl: Am 13.06.2011 22:16, schrieb Janek Warchoł: 2011/6/13 Janek Warchoł: Bad news: it doesn't work (the flags are squashed) An idea came to my mind - maybe we can use our *.table files

RE: Kievan square notation in LilyPond

2011-06-17 Thread James Lowe
Carl et al, From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org [lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] on behalf of Carl Sorensen [c_soren...@byu.edu] Sent: 17 June 2011 02:05 To: Aleksandr Andreev Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org Subj

Re: Patch: small reduction in output from make doc

2011-06-17 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "Graham Percival" ; Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:27 PM Subject: Re: Patch: small reduction in output from make doc "Phil Holmes" writes: TBH, I don't agree at all. I personally think there's nothing worse than a

Re: Patch: small reduction in output from make doc

2011-06-17 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" I would not mind if Lilypond wrote, upon encountering an error, all locators that are in the input tree concerning the error. Let it be a dozen. Those are relevant to the error. Easier to sift through them than two thousand lines not relevan

Re: Patch: small reduction in output from make doc

2011-06-17 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > From: "David Kastrup" >> Lilypond is commonly is called from a Makefile and other utilities, >> obliterating all useful output from them. >> >> The normal behavior for a Unix utility is to write to stderr when >> something goes wrong and then bottom out with a non-zero ex

Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Phil Holmes
I realise I may be on thin ice here... As many will know, I'm trying to reduce the clutter that appears on screen as lily's build progresses. A key way of doing this is by redirecting output to log files. If you've recently done a make doc and look in build/out/lybook-db you'll see some of t

Re: anchor-alignment in line-spanner.cc : is this vestigial?

2011-06-17 Thread Joe Neeman
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:40 PM, m...@apollinemike.com < m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > I see that the line-spanner print function looks for something that is > called anchor-alignment (git blame insinuates that it was Joe who added > this). This alignment, so far as I can see, is u

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:34:38AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > I'm now thinking it would actually be better to gather all the > output from make in a single directory, something like > build/makelogs. That way, you'd only need to look in one place for > any failing logged output, and it would prob

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:41 AM Subject: Re: Logfiles from build On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:34:38AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: I'm now thinking it would actually be better to gather all the output from make in a

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:41 AM Subject: Re: Logfiles from build On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:34:38AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: I'm now thinking it would actually be better to gather all the output from make in a

Re: Patch: small reduction in output from make doc

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:28:37AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > "Phil Holmes" writes: > > > From: "David Kastrup" > >> The normal behavior for a Unix utility is to write to stderr when > >> something goes wrong and then bottom out with a non-zero exit status. > >> Make (or similar tools) stop,

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Colin Campbell
On 11-06-17 02:34 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: I realise I may be on thin ice here... As many will know, I'm trying to reduce the clutter that appears on screen as lily's build progresses. A key way of doing this is by redirecting output to log files. If you've recently done a make doc and look i

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:19:33PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > In keeping with the GOP mentor discussion, (proposal summary) > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_2.html > I feel compelled to warn you that you do not have "a realistic > expectation of how things will work". I hate to say it, b

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:53:15AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" > > > >On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:34:38AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > >Before any work is done on the central log/ or > >build-log/ directory, I would really like to have the capabi

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 4:19 PM Subject: Re: Logfiles from build On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:53:15AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" >On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:34

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:35:47PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" > > >So when Reinhold and I say "we must not hide any errors in make", > > In that case, I can't see that anything I can do can prevent these > being visible. The only thing I can

Re: Patch: small reduction in output from make doc

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:31:21PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" > > >Hmm. Does it only create key-initial.midi, or does it also create > >key-initial.pdf ? (or .eps, or .png, etc) > > According to the output, it also creates *.pdf. However, n

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" [snip] with my memory of recent discussions, I know to look in /home/gperciva/src/lilypond/build/out/lybook-db/snippet-names--25272072.log for hints, but that's not at all obvious from just looking at the command-line output. Inside that fil

Re: Kievan square notation in LilyPond

2011-06-17 Thread Aleksandr Andreev
James wrote: > It's crude (but effective), you either sym link the font dirs to point to the > Gonville stuff (which is supplied via a zip/tgz file that you extract in > situ) or as in the case of windows and mac you rename the old font dir and > move the goneville one in its place. > This sou

RE: Kievan square notation in LilyPond

2011-06-17 Thread James Lowe
Hello, )-Original Message- )From: Aleksandr Andreev [mailto:aleksandr.andr...@gmail.com] )Sent: 17 June 2011 18:02 )To: James Lowe )Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: Re: Kievan square notation in LilyPond ) )James wrote: ) )> It's crude (but effective), you either sym link the font dirs

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:32:22PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" > > >with my memory of recent discussions, I know to look in > >/home/gperciva/src/lilypond/build/out/lybook-db/snippet-names--25272072.log > > This kind of issue prompted my sugges

Re: Logfiles from build

2011-06-17 Thread Julien Rioux
On 17/06/2011 2:11 PM, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:32:22PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" with my memory of recent discussions, I know to look in /home/gperciva/src/lilypond/build/out/lybook-db/snippet-names--25272072.log

echo but return false in make (was: Logfiles from build)

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:18:55PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote: > On 17/06/2011 2:11 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > >Again, on the shell, it would be something like this: > > make ...blah... || echo "build failed" && tail logfile > >but there might be a nicer way to do it. > > but then when blah fail

Re: echo but return false in make (was: Logfiles from build)

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:35:19PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:18:55PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote: > > On 17/06/2011 2:11 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > > > make ...blah... || echo "build failed" && tail logfile > > > > but then when blah fails, make will not stop, sin

Re: echo but return false in make (was: Logfiles from build)

2011-06-17 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:35:19PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > > >Again, on the shell, it would be something like this: > > > make ...blah... || echo "build failed" && tail logfile > > >but there might be a nicer way to do it. > > > > but then when blah fails, make will not stop, since the re

Re: echo but return false in make

2011-06-17 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:18:55PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote: >> On 17/06/2011 2:11 PM, Graham Percival wrote: >> >Again, on the shell, it would be something like this: >> > make ...blah... || echo "build failed" && tail logfile >> >but there might be a nicer way to do

Re: echo but return false in make (was: Logfiles from build)

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:06:01PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Just wait a few days until I've some spare time available to help > you with this, will you? Certainly! Thank you for your interest; I know that you know far more than me about this. Please also take a look at two recent git comm

Re: echo but return false in make

2011-06-17 Thread Julien Rioux
On 17/06/2011 3:10 PM, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:35:19PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:18:55PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote: On 17/06/2011 2:11 PM, Graham Percival wrote: make ...blah... || echo "build failed"&& tail logfile but then when bl

Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

2011-06-17 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 07:46:43AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > This is especially tragic because the initial quality of the patch was very > high. Karin is clearly a gifted programmer who figured out how to solve > this problem on her own. Losing her potential contributions to LilyPond is > a r