Re: Backporting for 2.14.2

On 6/28/11 12:30 PM, "Federico Bruni" wrote: > My question is here: > http://lilypond-translations.3384276.n2.nabble.com/snippets-in-LM-td6518251.ht > ml Looking at this more closely, I think the instructions (in CG 5.8.2) say that you open the snippet (in Documentation/snippets) and translate

Re: does anybody care about LSR?

On 6/28/11 11:16 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:45:36AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> On 6/28/11 9:48 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > > ...snip various LSR discussion... > >> I'm not sure I agree with this. > > I'm not certain what the "this" is that you're disag

Re: Backporting for 2.14.2

Il giorno lun, 27/06/2011 alle 13.13 -0600, Carl Sorensen ha scritto: > I'm trying to get ready for release 2.14.2. In general, I'd like > bugfixes > from 2.15.x to show up in 2.14.2. Carl, when v2.14.2 will be released? (more or less) Please consider that I'm going to prepare a patch for itali

Re: does anybody care about LSR?

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:45:36AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > On 6/28/11 9:48 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote: ...snip various LSR discussion... > I'm not sure I agree with this. I'm not certain what the "this" is that you're disagreeing with. :) > LSR is a place to put snippets that some peop

Re: does anybody care about LSR?

On 6/28/11 9:48 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > I was discussing LSR with Phil, and it occurred to me that I > should raise the question here. What do we want from LSR? > > As far as I'm concerned, no I don't care about LSR; the people who > wanted it in the first place aren't maintaining it; we

Re: Fix issues 1259 and 1433 (\breakDynamicSpan and a spanner's style=#'none over a line break) (issue4630070)

On 2011/06/28 15:03:40, J_lowe wrote: Passes reg tests - dynamics-alignment-breaker.ly is obviously different as the reg test itself has been changed. Yes, I removed that second \breakDynamicSpan, because I wanted to check that while the first cresc is broken, the second line spanner is reall

does anybody care about LSR?

I was discussing LSR with Phil, and it occurred to me that I should raise the question here. What do we want from LSR? As far as I'm concerned, no I don't care about LSR; the people who wanted it in the first place aren't maintaining it; we haven't had a flood of users volunteering to take care o

Re: Fix issues 1259 and 1433 (\breakDynamicSpan and a spanner's style=#'none over a line break) (issue4630070)

Passes reg tests - dynamics-alignment-breaker.ly is obviously different as the reg test itself has been changed. http://codereview.appspot.com/4630070/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypo

Re: Fix issues 1259 and 1433 (\breakDynamicSpan and a spanner's style=#'none over a line break) (issue4630070)

On 2011/06/26 12:25:15, Neil Puttock wrote: On 26 June 2011 13:02, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > So, I more and more get the impression that the approach of simply killing the > line spanner and letting its child dynamic spanners live on is the wrong > approach

Re: [PATCH]: Doc: NR @knownissue for partCombine + spanners (issue4629073)

Pushed as 8dec1b16ae6daff5b9a0f9fb806db66cf87bc5bd Thanks. Closing this one. James http://codereview.appspot.com/4629073/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: __stack_chk_fail@GLIBC_2.4

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > > /main/src/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib/libltdl.so.7: undefined > > reference to `__stack_chk_fail@GLIBC_2.4' > > You should find out what command that is. I don't fully understand > what's happeni

Re: how to create baroque ornaments

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:32:37AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > If somebody is willing to spend ~20 hours working on this, then > let's talk. If not, then brainstorming isn't going to get > anything done. A bit more info -- the first step is to clean up the existing ly/ directory. Something l

Re: how to create baroque ornaments

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:39:45AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > It seems we have so many really great third-party packages (Valentin's, > Nicolas', mine, Gilles' \extractMusic, etc... probably I'm not even aware of > some other great ones). I think we should think about a general way to >

Re: how to create baroque ornaments

> "Reinhold" == Reinhold Kainhofer writes: Reinhold> Am Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011, 06:14:06 schrieb Carl Sorensen: >> This is beautiful code, showing the creation of a useful scheme >> engraver. Is it in the LSR? It should be, IMO. Or perhaps it >> should even be included as part of our dist

Re: how to create baroque ornaments

Am Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011, 06:14:06 schrieb Carl Sorensen: > This is beautiful code, showing the creation of a useful scheme engraver. > Is it in the LSR? It should be, IMO. Or perhaps it should even be > included as part of our distribution. > > Developers, how should we get this into our syst

Re: how to create baroque ornaments

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:14:06PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > On 6/27/11 3:26 PM, "Nicolas Sceaux" wrote: > > For instance: > > > > \include "side-ornementations.ily" > > { > > \parc bes'4. \parb c''!8 \para d''4. <\pralla c'' \pralla e''>8 \bar "" > > } > > This is beautiful code, showi

Re: __stack_chk_fail@GLIBC_2.4

Graham Percival writes: Hi Graham, > GUB, using the release-2.14 branch, dies on > linux-x86::lilypond-doc. Apparently our docs now contain > something which uses a code path which we never used before? I don't think so. > This discussion: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5090881/libgcc-s-

Re: Add feta-flags to build system (issue4662055)

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:29:55AM +, philehol...@googlemail.com wrote: > http://codereview.appspot.com/4662055/diff/1/mf/GNUmakefile#oldcode19 > mf/GNUmakefile:19: $(call src-wildcard,feta-notehead*[0-9].mf) \ > I'm assuming this is an old line of make, but I think to be correct, > feta-notehe

Re: Add feta-flags to build system (issue4662055)

Minor comment. http://codereview.appspot.com/4662055/diff/1/mf/GNUmakefile File mf/GNUmakefile (left): http://codereview.appspot.com/4662055/diff/1/mf/GNUmakefile#oldcode19 mf/GNUmakefile:19: $(call src-wildcard,feta-notehead*[0-9].mf) \ I'm assuming this is an old line of make, but I think to

Re: Implements multiple-line non-cross-staff glissandi (issue4527086)

Thanks Neil! I copied and pasted your function into the code and it works well. I am not used to non-recursive looping functions in Scheme, as I often erroneously conceive of Scheme as a language that doesn't remember the values of variables outside of certain contexts (define, let, etc.). I'll g

Re: Allows for rider grobs in outside-staff-priority. (issue4639075)

On 2011/06/27 21:56:00, Neil Puttock wrote: This doesn't look too good: \relative c' { \override TupletBracket #'outside-staff-priority = #1 \times 2/3 { c2 c c } } -> needlessly translated away from stave Fixed in the newest patchset. Thanks for catching that! http://codereview.