Re: Moving away from make

Hi, On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 01:35:02PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > I found some info on creating loops in gnu make, but it didn't seem > possible to have loops in pure bsd make. Well, why would it need to work with BSD Make? Gmake is available as an optional tool pretty much everywhere -- an

Re: ragged-last-bottom should not ignore stretching on the last page

On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:57:33 -0700, Xavier Scheuer wrote: Maybe this has been already discussed, but I do not like the current vertical spacing behaviour of the last page when using ragged-last-bottom (##t by default). It has been discussed, most recently at

Re: Optimizes note-heads.cc and introduces robust_symbol2string. (issue 5233042)

Thanks Neil, I'll make two commits. Do you want to see them both on codereview? Comment in lily-guile restored. http://codereview.appspot.com/5233042/diff/12001/lily/lily-guile.cc File lily/lily-guile.cc (left): http://codereview.appspot.com/5233042/diff/12001/lily/lily-guile.cc#oldcode72 lily

Re: GUB

On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 06:13:23PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > OK. This gives: > > libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 2.2.6, but the > libtool: definition of this LT_INIT comes from libtool 2.2.6b. > libtool: You should recreate aclocal.m4 with macros from libtool 2.2.6 > libtool:

Re: GUB

- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 4:23 PM Subject: Re: GUB On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 04:03:02PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: Patch for GUB git to update locations of relevant files that were missing. Thanks, I'll apply

Re: GUB

On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 05:47:25PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 8 October 2011 17:41, Graham Percival wrote: > > > It might be nice to determine the "recommended" command to build > > the installer for a specific binary and a specific platform -- and > > to easily support giving it a local rep

Re: GUB

On 8 October 2011 17:41, Graham Percival wrote: > Yeah, that's the point of using one of the other commands; you can > specify the branch.  There's also some way of specifying the > branch using the bin/gub method too... it'd be listed in > lilypond.make... but I don't have it written down handy.

Re: GUB

On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 04:46:58PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > > bin/gub --platform=mingw > > 'git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond-doc.git?branch=release/unstable' > > bin/gub mingw::lilypond-installer > > is what I use. > > I had to restore shallow cloning and hack specs/lilypond.py to get it > to f

Re: Creates a LeftBarStub that stops lyrics from bumping into the SystemStartBar. (issue 5201043)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5201043/diff/3001/scm/output-lib.scm File scm/output-lib.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5201043/diff/3001/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode355 scm/output-lib.scm:355: (if (eq? 0 (ly:item-break-dir grob)) Doesn't this potentially make the function unpure? If I

Re: GUB

On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 04:03:02PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > Patch for GUB git to update locations of relevant files that were missing. Thanks, pushed. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mail

Stem direction wrong for white mensural music?

If I compile the following code (the start of Dufay's Ave Regina a3) with default settings, the stems follow modern style - some up, some down. For ancient music (I'm not sure when this ended, but it certainly applies around the period up to 1500) the stems were always up for normal notes; - d

Re: Optimizes note-heads.cc and introduces robust_symbol2string. (issue 5233042)

Hi Betrand, This should be split into two patches: one for the optimization and another for adding robust_symbol2string lookups outside note-head.cc. Cheers, Neil http://codereview.appspot.com/5233042/diff/12001/lily/lily-guile.cc File lily/lily-guile.cc (left): http://codereview.appspot.com/

Re: GUB

On 8 October 2011 16:23, Graham Percival wrote: > I /think/ it's this command you want: > > python bin/gib --platform=mingw > --branch=lilypond=git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-master lilypond > > (all on one line) > > but it might be this one instead: > > bin/gub --platform=mingw > 'git://git.sv.gnu

Re: GUB

- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 4:23 PM Subject: Re: GUB On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 04:03:02PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: Patch for GUB git to update locations of relevant files that were missing. Thanks, I'll apply

Re: GUB

On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 04:03:02PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > Patch for GUB git to update locations of relevant files that were missing. Thanks, I'll apply it in about 90 minutes. (I'm making a release right now and it's doing the regtest comparison, so it needs to build the docs and upload, the

Re: GUB

- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 7:24 PM Subject: GUB On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:09:57PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: Tail of target/tools/log/perl.log tar: Unexpected EOF in archive tar: Unexpected EOF in

Re: Markup implementation

Not finding a more suitable thread to hook onto. Nicolas Sceaux writes: > Le 17 sept. 2011 à 17:41, m...@apollinemike.com a écrit : >> >> I've been toying with the idea for some time now of making markups >> at all levels behave more like grobs. It would require a massive >> code rewrite, but

Re: Errors when doing 'make' for the first time when building the fonts

>> They are problematic, and they have not `always been there' :-) > > Correction: using our official development environment lilydev, they > *have* always been there. Hmm. >> Please use a recent version of FontForge, and please compile it >> with `--enable-double'. > > This warning is in the i

Re: Errors when doing 'make' for the first time when building the fonts

On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 08:05:12AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > I expect most of them have always been there, but I wondered if they > > are problematic or not? > > They are problematic, and they have not `always been there' :-) Correction: using our official development environment lilyde

Re: Errors when doing 'make' for the first time when building the fonts

Werner LEMBERG writes: >>> and the version string contains `-D' or `-LD', e.g. >>> >>> Executable based on sources from 23:14 GMT 25-Feb-2011-ML-TtfDb-D. >>> ^^ >> >> Unfortunately, Ubuntu Maverick (11.04) only ships a version from

Argument scanning, take II

Short of changing the argument syntax of music functions to something less fuzzy altogether (implying GLISS), one needs a somewhat mixed approach. It is clear that something like \relative c' c' vs \relative { c' } offer some significant challenges with regard to argument parsing. Something lik

Re: Allows NoteColumns to be skipped over by glissandi. (issue 5242041)

On Oct 8, 2011, at 7:26 AM, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote: > passes make and make check only throws out > > @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ > Writing graph `#f'...digraph G { > rankdir="LR" > node [shape=rectangle] > -41 [label="caching Stem.stencil\n# -> #"] > +41 [label="caching LedgerLineSpanner.stencil\n# -> #"]

Re: Errors when doing 'make' for the first time when building the fonts

>> and the version string contains `-D' or `-LD', e.g. >> >> Executable based on sources from 23:14 GMT 25-Feb-2011-ML-TtfDb-D. >> ^^ > > Unfortunately, Ubuntu Maverick (11.04) only ships a version from 2010: > > reinhold@eeepc:~$ fon

Re: Errors when doing 'make' for the first time when building the fonts

Am Saturday 08 October 2011, 08:29:22 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > If you get this error inspite of using a FontForge version configured > with `--enable-double', we have a problem in the Metafont code which > must be fixed. > > You can check this by yourself if you say > > fontforge --version >