On Oct 22, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:18:39PM +0100, Peekay Ex wrote:
I think 1d9a73b13ee576d28c0f41f5b243f2ebb1ff9fcf is the checkin that
breaks make doc.
It's a good thing that I looked at this at 5am, because upon
examining the commit I
On Oct 22, 2011, at 10:55 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Oct 22, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:18:39PM +0100, Peekay Ex wrote:
I think 1d9a73b13ee576d28c0f41f5b243f2ebb1ff9fcf is the checkin that
breaks make doc.
It's a good thing that I
Hi,
this is outrageous - my ISP still didn't connect me to the internet. Maybe
they'll do it in the next week, but it will still take ages till i dig
through all the unread lily mails. Sorry...
Hope to see you soon,
Janek
2011/10/10 Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
Hi all,
Hello,
Compare the two 'scores' - the only difference is the override
\version 2.15.15
\relative c'' {
\once \override Staff.StaffSymbol #'line-positions = #'(0 2 4)
f4 d g, e
\stopStaff
f'4 d g, e
\startStaff
f'4 d g, e
}
\relative c'' {
f4 d g, e
\stopStaff
f'4 d g, e
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:18:39PM +0100, Peekay Ex wrote:
I think 1d9a73b13ee576d28c0f41f5b243f2ebb1ff9fcf is the checkin that
breaks make doc.
It's a good thing that I looked at this at 5am, because upon
examining the commit I unleashed a
Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
David,
Re: the whole \relative discussion.
This may or may not surprise you.
\version 2.15.15
\relative c'' {
f'4 a, a,, f
\stopStaff
\startStaff
f'4 a, a,, f
\stopStaff
\startStaff
f'''4 a, a,, f
}
Certainly didn't do what I expected it to.
On Oct 22, 2011, at 1:08 AM, percival.music...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5293053/diff/12001/lily/page-breaking.cc
File lily/page-breaking.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5293053/diff/12001/lily/page-breaking.cc#newcode189
lily/page-breaking.cc:189:
New, simpler, patch added
On 2011/10/17 18:56:58, Keith wrote:
Most of the complexity is due to the repeating cycle facility. First,
you might
try out that feature, and reconsider whether it is worth the
complexity in the
code.
I tried it for a number of notations from
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 09:56:16PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Running fix-cc.py, I got:
astyle wasn't in the lilydev Ubuntu, so I used apt-get to get
it. Maybe there's a problem with versioning?
You need version 2.02. It would be nice if the script warned if
you had a different
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:36:14AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I'm assuming that this fixes the problem, and if so, I apologize
for putting @{Beam} and not @code{Beam}. This was, as Graham
said, a last minute add-on that I thought was automatically
checked during make all (I thought
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:22:54PM -0700, -Eluze wrote:
1) add a snippet to LSR showing this method. Make sure that the
snippet is tagged with docs.
2) wait until it's automatically part of the docs.
although the snippet i added a few days ago is not approved yet i can see it
when
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 05:39:33PM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
On 11-10-20 12:29 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:05:54AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
../lib/.libs/libcurl.so: undefined reference to `SSLv2_client_method'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
I already
12 matches
Mail list logo
