On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:38:28 -0800, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Could you post some PDFs of the patch in action?
There's an example at http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2060
Just reading the code, with respect to:
if (bound-is_non_musical (bound) ||
passes make and make check
james
http://codereview.appspot.com/5438060/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Ok, I'm back in civilization, I've spent the weekend doing
renovation both in terms of furniture, computer hardware, and
computer software. Two hard drives (850 megs and 5 gigs) have
been demolished in my quest for powerful household magnets, and I
have a new mac mini with ubuntu, which puts me
passes make and make check
james
http://codereview.appspot.com/5373048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:38:28 -0800, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
In the original report, my eyes zoomed directly to the second system, last
measure (which my patch fixes).
Just to be clear, the one-line fix linked to issue 2060 fixes that original
report as well.
I
ARGH. My bad :-( Really sorry guys. It's very simple what happened,
and in fact you already know most of it:
- There was a long period of time in between the completion of the
review and pushing to staging, due to my misunderstanding of the
development process (which I will partially
I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi' that:
--) There is no English term that I know of that succinctly expresses
the idea of being sent back to something. And, as new terms are
invented out of necessity, I took the liberty to invent one here with
`renvoi,' which Jankélévitch
mts...@gmail.com writes:
I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi' that:
--) There is no English term that I know of that succinctly expresses
the idea of being sent back to something.
returned
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
mts...@gmail.com writes:
I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi' that:
--) There is no English term that I know of that succinctly expresses
the idea of being sent back to something.
returned
I meant noun. And even `return'
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:08 PM, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
The only problem that remains is that the display-lily-tests shows a
one-space increase in the new output. I've made the string rendered for
AlternativeEvent , but is there any way just to get the display method
to ignore it (meaning not
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
mts...@gmail.com writes:
I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi' that:
--) There is no English term that I know of that succinctly expresses
the idea of being sent back to
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
mts...@gmail.com writes:
I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi' that:
--) There is no English term that I know of that succinctly expresses
the
Thanks Mike. Changes made.
james
http://codereview.appspot.com/5433064/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5433064/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1038
On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:38:28 -0800, m...@apollinemike.com
m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
In the original report, my eyes zoomed directly to the second system, last
measure (which my patch fixes).
Just to be clear, the one-line fix linked
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:20 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:08 PM, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
The only problem that remains is that the display-lily-tests shows a
one-space increase in the new output. I've made the string rendered for
AlternativeEvent , but is there any
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Adam Spiers
lilypond-de...@adamspiers.org wrote:
I'm building a fixed version
of the patch series as I type this, and will push as soon as I'm
convinced it's good, in order to minimise the risk of someone else
accidentally pushing the old series back in.
I have my problems imagining why you don't just use ly:stencil-translate
on the result.
If you really want to have a separately specifiable origin, I would not
make a separate function but rather add it as an optional argument at
the end of the argument list.
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:33 PM, d...@gnu.org wrote:
I have my problems imagining why you don't just use ly:stencil-translate
on the result.
If you really want to have a separately specifiable origin, I would not
make a separate function but rather add it as an optional argument at
the end of
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:08:52 -0800, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi'
No no. I love renvoi. You were just using it wrongly,
to refer to the action of entering an alternative ending.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On 29/11/11 18:26, Keith OHara wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:08:52 -0800, mts...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll just say to all you haters of `renvoi'
No no. I love renvoi. You were just using it wrongly, to refer
to the action of entering an alternative ending.
How about diversion (in the sense of
Passes Make and Make check
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5449043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make - reg tests attached
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2057#c18
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5438060/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make, make check. Also did a new build using ./autogen
--noconfigure then cd build ./configure etc. and re-ran a full make and
make test-baseline.
Hope that was enough :)
Passes all.
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5431088/
___
Passes make and make check
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5450046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes Make and Make check
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi all,
In a fresh checkout I run
./autogen.sh --noconfigure
mkdir build0
cd build0
../configure --disable-optimising
make make doc
This is a sequential make and make doc. The latter stops with the error
message given below. Extract_texi_filename is the last thing that runs
correctly and
I don't think we should be defining the bezier routines as public.
Users shouldn't call them directly, IMO. We should be operating on
grobs. And there is no bezier grob (at least as far as I can
determine).
Encouraging users to goe below the published interfaces is bad behavior.
What is the
Hi,
the attached code is my attempt to center a NoteColumn in a measure (like
MultiMeasureRest).
It's based upon
http://old.nabble.com/centering-text-on-a-measure-td32377202.html (thanks
to David Nalesnik)
While it works fine in most cases, there is one major problem:
Having a key-change to
On Nov 29, 2011, at 11:39 PM, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think we should be defining the bezier routines as public.
Users shouldn't call them directly, IMO. We should be operating on
grobs. And there is no bezier grob (at least as far as I can
determine).
Encouraging users
Julien
On 29 November 2011 22:28, Julien Rioux jri...@physics.utoronto.ca wrote:
Hi all,
In a fresh checkout I run
./autogen.sh --noconfigure
mkdir build0
cd build0
../configure --disable-optimising
make make doc
This is a sequential make and make doc. The latter stops with the error
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 05:28:37PM -0500, Julien Rioux wrote:
This is a sequential make and make doc. The latter stops with the
error message given below. Extract_texi_filename is the last thing
that runs correctly and then make tries to copy a file from the
build dir instead of the source
For 20:00 MST Thursday December 1
Critical:
Issue 2061
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2061: Lyrics
collide with bar lines - R 5449043 http://codereview.appspot.com/5449043/
Issue 1997
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1997: segfault in
Now it looks quite good, and still works great.
C'est si bon.
Is maith é sin.
Smashing, old chap.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5440049/diff/11010/lily/bar-number-engraver.cc
File lily/bar-number-engraver.cc (right):
Adam Spiers lilypond-devel at adamspiers.org writes:
Fixed patch series is now in staging.
I am now seeing trouble with 'chord-name-exceptions.ly' and similar.
The slash missing in the markup for the \chordmode { c:7sus4 }.
___
lilypond-devel
34 matches
Mail list logo
