Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Joe Neeman wrote: > 2012/3/6 > >> Mike & all, >> >> i did a quick compile with patchset 36 and unfortunately didn't notice >> significant speedups from previous version. > > > Could you try the dev/jneem branch in git? It has some optimizations. If > that doesn't

Re: Issue 2376: Automatic footnotes on \null markups causes unexpected results (issue 5755058)

Reviewers: MikeSol, http://codereview.appspot.com/5755058/diff/1/lily/page-breaking.cc File lily/page-breaking.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5755058/diff/1/lily/page-breaking.cc#newcode584 lily/page-breaking.cc:584: } On 2012/03/07 07:30:42, MikeSol wrote: Just a C++ question - do

Re: Web: add GSoC ideas list (issue 5753059)

pushed as cc5223ac26a5713c5901c02edf2868c26be10542. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Issue 2376: Automatic footnotes on \null markups causes unexpected results (issue 5755058)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5755058/diff/1/lily/page-breaking.cc File lily/page-breaking.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5755058/diff/1/lily/page-breaking.cc#newcode584 lily/page-breaking.cc:584: } Just a C++ question - do these lines implicitly call the copy constructor to create fo

Re: Uses derived_mark to avoid segfault (issue 5729051)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5729051/diff/6001/lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc File lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5729051/diff/6001/lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc#newcode35 lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc:35: these four contexts. On 2012/03/04 21:35:57, Kei

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 as a LilyDev

Hello 2012/3/6 Francisco Vila : > 2012/3/6 Janek Warchoł : >> The only thing that concerns me is xterm.  Do i understand correctly >> that it's the only available terminal?  The default one in current >> LilyDev is much better, has tabs and all eye-candy a terminal can >> have. > > What does Ctrl+

Re: LilyPond 2.14.2 is in Ubuntu 12.04 software centre

On 6 March 2012 21:36, James wrote: > Francisco, > > On 5 March 2012 23:41, Francisco Vila wrote: > > 2012/3/5 James : > >> Hello, > >> > >> Just in case anyone was interested. Thanks to whoever sorted this out > >> - it used to be 2.11 or even 2.10 not so many months ago. > > > > 330.7 MB to do

PATCH: Countdown to 20120308

For 20:00 MST Thursday March 8 Issue 2376 : Automatic footnotes on \null markups causes unexpected results - R 5755058 Cheers, Colin -- Every man is a damned fool for at least five minutes

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 as a LilyDev

2012/3/6 Janek Warchoł : > The only thing that concerns me is xterm.  Do i understand correctly > that it's the only available terminal?  The default one in current > LilyDev is much better, has tabs and all eye-candy a terminal can > have. What does Ctrl+Alt+T do? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spa

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

2012/3/6 > Mike & all, > > i did a quick compile with patchset 36 and unfortunately didn't notice > significant speedups from previous version. > Could you try the dev/jneem branch in git? It has some optimizations. If that doesn't help, could you please send me some of the worst files? Cheers,

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 as a LilyDev

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:22 PM, James wrote: > Hello, > > 2012/3/6 Janek Warchoł : >> Maybe LilyDev 2.0 should be Ubuntu 12.04. > > No we have to think about GUB and the fact that 12.04 is still in > beta. I think as has been suggested by Graham that we'll do another > round on 10.04 with LilyDev

Re: LilyPond 2.14.2 is in Ubuntu 12.04 software centre

Francisco, On 5 March 2012 23:41, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2012/3/5 James : >> Hello, >> >> Just in case anyone was interested. Thanks to whoever sorted this out >> - it used to be 2.11 or even 2.10 not so many months ago. > > 330.7 MB to download, 905.2 MB when installed? > > Synaptic says size 4

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 as a LilyDev

Hello, 2012/3/6 Janek Warchoł : > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, James wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've just been seeing if Ubuntu 12.04 is going to cause any >> significant problems for the next major LilyDev upgrade. >> [...] >> make and make doc work fine (well make doc completes with no errors I

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 as a LilyDev

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, James wrote: > Hello, > > I've just been seeing if Ubuntu 12.04 is going to cause any > significant problems for the next major LilyDev upgrade. > [...] > make and make doc work fine (well make doc completes with no errors I > haven't actually looked through all the

Re: Ubuntu 12.04 as a LilyDev

James writes: > Hello, > > I've just been seeing if Ubuntu 12.04 is going to cause any > significant problems for the next major LilyDev upgrade. > checking gcc version... 4.6.3 Wow. It was released on March 1 or so IIRC. -- David Kastrup ___ lil

Ubuntu 12.04 as a LilyDev

Hello, I've just been seeing if Ubuntu 12.04 is going to cause any significant problems for the next major LilyDev upgrade. I had no problems at all. 12.04 is still in beta 1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/TechnicalOverview/Beta1#Download_the_Beta_1 This was the image I used http:/

Re: Web: add GSoC ideas list (issue 5753059)

LGTM. Wait another few hours (until 21:00 or 22:00 UST), then push to staging. If you're going to bed before then, go ahead and push to staging earlier. If there's problems that aren't noticed before you push it, we can fix the page later. Make sure it's in staging before James runs patch stag

Re: Web: add GSoC ideas list (issue 5753059)

Fixed http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/5001/Documentation/web/community.itexi File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/5001/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode1012 Documentation/web/community.itexi:1012: @subheading Better tabula

Re: Web: add GSoC ideas list (issue 5753059)

Looks pretty good to me. Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/5001/Documentation/web/community.itexi File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/5001/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode1012 Documentation/web/community.itexi:1012:

Re: Web: add GSoC ideas list (issue 5753059)

New patchset. On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:36 PM, wrote: If you add a new section to the website without changing the relevant part of Documentation/lilypond-texi2html.init, the colors will get messed up. See line 1516. done. Actually, i think that one entry was already missing before my change

Re: Web: add GSoC ideas list (issue 5753059)

If you add a new section to the website without changing the relevant part of Documentation/lilypond-texi2html.init, the colors will get messed up. See line 1516. http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): http

old web pages

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:01:44PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Oh, by the way, Google's first hit for "LilyPond download" is > http://lilypond.org/web/install/> which states "When we have > whetted your appetite for LilyPond, then this is the right page." > Unfortunately, it is the wrong page sin

Re: Web: add GSoC ideas list (issue 5753059)

At 17:01 on 06 Mar 2012, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: >Reviewers: Graham Percival, carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com, MikeSol, >lemzwerg, Reinhold, joeneeman, > >Message: >Please review asap, it's only a couple days left before application >deadline. line 912: s/counfusing/confusing/ -- Mark Knoop

Re: Web: add GSoC ideas list (issue 5753059)

A few comments on the text, but otherwise LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode83 Documentation/web/community.ite

Regtests for 2.15.32

Official regtests are nice and clean. -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Web: add GSoC ideas list (issue 5753059)

Reviewers: Graham Percival, carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com, MikeSol, lemzwerg, Reinhold, joeneeman, Message: Please review asap, it's only a couple days left before application deadline. http://codereview.appspot.com/5753059/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi File Documentation/web/community

Re: MacOS X development and support

Colin Hall writes: > Hi, > > I'm interested to improve the pace and quality of development of > Lilypond for MacOS X. I'd like to know if the developers are > supportive of this, and get your advice on how to best direct my > efforts. > > First, a few statements to solicit information. I'm keen,

Re: Cross-staff stem engraver (was: New frog in an empty pond?)

On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Hello! > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:14:29 -0800 > Joe Neeman wrote: > >> Don't use ly:axis-group-interface::add-element, because stems don't >> implement the axis-group-interface. (Removing this will also remove >> the axes warning.) Instead, us

Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)

Mike & all, i did a quick compile with patchset 36 and unfortunately didn't notice significant speedups from previous version. Compilation time differences vary widely depending on music (from 5% to 100% longer) PROCESSING ../dynamics.ly WITH MASTER: -- real0m0.762s user

Re: release candidate blocked due to issues to verify

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > We now have zero Critical issues, so I'd like to have another > release canddiate.  Unfortunately, there is still at least one > "issue to verify" in the list for 2.15.31, so I will not make a > release. > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond

Re: Google Summer of Code, LilyPond and GNU

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > Let's see if we can rescue this somehow. > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:52:00AM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Graham Percival >> wrote: >> > No. Put the patch on rietveld, and once people have commented, i

Re: Google Summer of Code, LilyPond and GNU

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:22:42PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Graham Percival > wrote: > > What happens about the tax form?  I'm not signing any legal > > document unless I'm certain it's the right thing.  Is GNU > > submitting that "foreign income" thing for us

Re: Wikimedia and LilyPond

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > As one can see in > https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7355>, LilyPond > plugins are not considered safe to use in Wikimedia because of Denial of > Service concerns. > > However, a sizable number of contributors could likely be

Re: Google Summer of Code, LilyPond and GNU

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 10:48:28PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> Graham, i understand that you'll be our project administrator.  When >> Ideas List will be up, you'll have to register at >> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/googl

Re: Uses derived_mark to avoid segfault (issue 5729051)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5729051/diff/6001/lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc File lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5729051/diff/6001/lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc#newcode93 lily/span-bar-stub-engraver.cc:93: if (!scm_is_pair (axis_groups_) || !scm_is_pair

Wikimedia and LilyPond

As one can see in https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7355>, LilyPond plugins are not considered safe to use in Wikimedia because of Denial of Service concerns. However, a sizable number of contributors could likely be expected to actually run LilyPond on their own computer. So can an