Re: Doc: AU - document -dhelp CLI options (issue 5843060)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5843060/diff/1/Documentation/usage/running.itely File Documentation/usage/running.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5843060/diff/1/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode56 Documentation/usage/running.itely:56: * Basic command line options for lilypond:

Issue 1320: Rewriting bar-line::print

Hello list, I want to rewrite most if not all definitions currently settled in lily/bar-line.cc in scheme. Please see the attached file for my progress so far; I don't get any error messages, but no bar lines either :-( Is this a feasible approach? What am I currently doing wrong? Thanks for a

Re: Issue 1320: Rewriting bar-line::print

Marc Hohl writes: > Hello list, > > I want to rewrite most if not all definitions currently settled in > lily/bar-line.cc in scheme. Please see the attached file for my > progress so far; I don't get any error messages, but no bar lines either :-( > > Is this a feasible approach? What am I curre

Re: Issue 1320: Rewriting bar-line::print

Am 20.03.2012 10:19, schrieb David Kastrup: Marc Hohl writes: Hello list, I want to rewrite most if not all definitions currently settled in lily/bar-line.cc in scheme. Please see the attached file for my progress so far; I don't get any error messages, but no bar lines either :-( Is this a

Re: Issue 1320: Rewriting bar-line::print

Marc Hohl writes: > Am 20.03.2012 10:19, schrieb David Kastrup: >> Marc Hohl writes: >> >>> Hello list, >>> >>> I want to rewrite most if not all definitions currently settled in >>> lily/bar-line.cc in scheme. Please see the attached file for my >>> progress so far; I don't get any error messa

Re: new lilypond-auto mailing list

On 2012-03-20 00:28, Graham Percival wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:11:46AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: So instead of surprising volunteers by giving them more information than expected we give them less information than expected? Bug squad members shouldn't be reading tracker messages anywa

Re: new lilypond-auto mailing list

hello, On 20 March 2012 10:47, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > On 2012-03-20 00:28, Graham Percival wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:11:46AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >>> So instead of surprising volunteers by giving them more information than >>> expected we give them less information t

Re: Lilypond 2.15.34 on MacOS X

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:50:41PM +, Colin Hall wrote: > > Hi All, > > You may have seen the announcement that version 2.15.34 of Lilypond has been > released. It would be great to hear if it works for you on your respective > platforms so that I can update the table below. > > I'll post

Re: Axis group interface ignores column rank for pure-from-neighbor-interface (issue 5843063)

On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:51:04 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:36 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: do you still need this change ? It looks like I do, I had expected that separation-item.cc calls pure_height with start=0 and end=INT_MAX for horizontal spacing; then

lilypond-book: Set include path for --output option (issue 2423). (issue 5846075)

LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/5846075/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Tracks old announcements, news and changelogs. (issue 5843069)

LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/5843069/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Axis group interface ignores column rank for pure-from-neighbor-interface (issue 5843063)

On Mar 20, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Keith OHara wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:51:04 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com > wrote: > >> On Mar 20, 2012, at 3:36 AM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: >> >>> do you still need this change ? >> >> It looks like I do, > > I had expected that separation-item.cc calls

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

Hi, 2012/3/16 Graham Percival > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:52:52PM +0100, Marek Klein wrote: > > > > I can do it, I think (almost every day). > > Great! Here's the link to get started: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy > > ... although apparently that doesn't incl

Re: Tracks old announcements, news and changelogs. (issue 5843069)

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:07 PM, wrote: > LGTM > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5843069/ Thanks for having a look. By the way, it looks like http://lilypond.org/website just replicates http://lilypong.org at a deeper level -- any reason why this is so? Is that from before the switch to the new

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

On 20/03/2012 4:26 PM, Marek Klein wrote: Hi, 2012/3/16 Graham Percival On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:52:52PM +0100, Marek Klein wrote: I can do it, I think (almost every day). Great! Here's the link to get started: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/patchy ... although

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

2012/3/20 Julien Rioux > > python test-patches.py > > This is the result: Trying issue 2272 Found patch: (2272, '/home/marek/lilypond-patchy/issue5843063_7.diff', 'Long monosyllabic words collide with barlines') Problem compiling master. Patchy cannot reliably continue. Traceback (most recent ca

Re: Tracks old announcements, news and changelogs. (issue 5843069)

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 04:41:34PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote: > Thanks for having a look. By the way, it looks like > http://lilypond.org/website just replicates http://lilypong.org at a > deeper level -- any reason why this is so? Is that from before the > switch to the new website? Correct, but

Re: Fix crash when unknown grob name is passed to ly:engraver-make-grob (issue 5715053)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5715053/diff/2001/lily/engraver-scheme.cc File lily/engraver-scheme.cc (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5715053/diff/2001/lily/engraver-scheme.cc#newcode42 lily/engraver-scheme.cc:42: programming_error ("cannot create grob"); This gives no helpful indication o

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:48:57PM +0100, Marek Klein wrote: > Exception: Failed runner: ./autogen.sh --noconfigure > See the log file log-None-autogen.sh.txt Well, what's in the log file log-None-autgen.sh.txt ? It's in the build directory. This whole infrastructure assumes that you c

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

Graham Percival writes: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:48:57PM +0100, Marek Klein wrote: >> Exception: Failed runner: ./autogen.sh --noconfigure >> See the log file log-None-autogen.sh.txt > > Well, what's in the log file log-None-autgen.sh.txt ? It's in the > build directory. > > This w

2.16 release criteria

Well, the good news is that we have not had anything holding up the release without a fix in the pipeline for at least a month (or so it feels). The bad news is that the pipelines still see quite a bit of action. It will be luck more than anything else if we have a pause in the stream of newly d

Re: 2.16 release criteria

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:06:42AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > > I have the fear that the desire to get to this state might prompt some > regression fixes that have not necessarily gotten all the diligence that > would have been desirable. This is a valid fear in general, but I haven't seen it

Re: lilypond-book: Set include path for --output option (issue 2423). (issue 5846075)

http://codereview.appspot.com/5846075/diff/1/scripts/lilypond-book.py File scripts/lilypond-book.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5846075/diff/1/scripts/lilypond-book.py#newcode639 scripts/lilypond-book.py:639: global_options.include_path.insert (0, inverse_relpath (original_dir, global

Re: Issue 1320: Rewriting bar-line::print

Hi Marc, Some observations: the main problem seems to be the storing of the new stencils in an alist and how to call them. Directly in bar-line::compound-bar-line works. Also, I created bar-line-stencil-alist-demo containing new stencils, which are defined before. Calling them in bar-line::compou

Re: Issue 1320: Rewriting bar-line::print

Marc Hohl writes: > Is this a feasible approach? What am I currently doing wrong? > #(define bar-line-stencil-alist > '(("|" . thin-stil) > ("." . thick-stil) > ("" . empty-stil) > )) > (thin-stil (bar-line::simple-bar-line grob hair extent rounded)) > (thick-

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

On 16 March 2012 21:45, Janek Warchoł wrote: > > Can you share your thoughts? Lilypond would never be useful for Google products. There is absolutely no point for Google to pay for code that would never be useful for them. Łukasz ___ lilypond-devel m

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

Łukasz Czerwiński writes: > On 16 March 2012 21:45, Janek Warchoł > wrote: > > > > Can you share your thoughts? > > > Lilypond would never be useful for Google products. There is > absolutely no point for Google to pay for code that would never be > useful for them. A music search

Re: FW: [LilyPond] Your organization application has been rejected.

2012/3/20 Łukasz Czerwiński : >> >> Can you share your thoughts? > > Lilypond would never be useful for Google products. There is absolutely no > point for Google to pay for code that would never be useful for them. The point of GSOC is not to improve google products. See also: http://www.google-m

PATCH: Countdown to 20120322

For 20:00 MST Thursday, March 22* Critical: Issue 2272 : Long monosyllabic words collide with barlines - R 5843063 Issue 2397 :

Re: Axis group interface ignores column rank for pure-from-neighbor-interface (issue 5843063)

Yippee; no more grobs getting their pure_height from their neighbors! Don't forget to update the commit message. You can also "edit this issue" to update the title and summary here on Rietveld. http://codereview.appspot.com/5843063/diff/7/input/regression/pure-from-neighbor-interface-pure-heig