Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

2012-03-27 Thread Phil Holmes
As you can guess, that's the logfile produced when lily runs multiple jobs simultaneously. It also produces logfiles called something like multicpu0.log - look in the same directory for these - they'll have the most recent timestamp, too. Phil Holmes - Original Message - From:

Re: In-tree make check fails with lilypond-book include file regtest.

2012-03-27 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:18:18PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote: >> I locally reverted your revert and could make, make test and make >> doc from scratch in the src dir after the fixes that I committed >> today. Unless there is any objections I will push the revert of the >

PATCH: Countdown to 20120329

2012-03-27 Thread Colin Campbell
For 20:00 MDT Thursday March 29 Scripts: Issue 2440 : Patch: rall. and accel stopped working in articulate - R5927044 Cheers, Colin -- To live content with small means;to seek elegance rathe

Re: In-tree make check fails with lilypond-book include file regtest.

2012-03-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:34:37PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > Let's see if current master can be built ok, and fix the dist > failures. *Then* we can add back the lilypond-book thing. oh wait, I just checked git and now see that you have a fix for dist, and have a solution for this as well.

Re: In-tree make check fails with lilypond-book include file regtest.

2012-03-27 Thread Graham Percival
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:18:18PM -0400, Julien Rioux wrote: > I locally reverted your revert and could make, make test and make > doc from scratch in the src dir after the fixes that I committed > today. Unless there is any objections I will push the revert of the > revert to staging. Please wai

Re: how to handle big attachments to bugreports?

2012-03-27 Thread James
Janek, 2012/3/27 Janek Warchoł : > Hi, > > i have a multi-issue bug report almost done, and it contains about 5 > MB of examples (i've already cut it down).  I remember that we have > little space on google tracker, how shall i handle these files?  I > don't have my webserver and i don't like th

how to handle big attachments to bugreports?

2012-03-27 Thread Janek Warchoł
Hi, i have a multi-issue bug report almost done, and it contains about 5 MB of examples (i've already cut it down). I remember that we have little space on google tracker, how shall i handle these files? I don't have my webserver and i don't like the idea of putting them on some hosting website,

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

2012-03-27 Thread Marek Klein
2012/3/27 Julien Rioux > > So it points to /tmp/lilypond-autobuild/build/**out/lybook-testdb/snippet- > **names--7220266384705246370.log > > Is that file still around? > > http://gregoriana.sk/data/snippet-names--7220266384705246370.log Marek ___ lilyp

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

2012-03-27 Thread Julien Rioux
On 27/03/2012 3:20 PM, Marek Klein wrote: 2012/3/27 Julien Rioux On 27/03/2012 2:58 PM, Marek Klein wrote: However, I cannot find the log file :( On a default configuration this logfile would be in /tmp/lilypond-autobuild Cheers, Julien Here it is: http://gregoriana.sk/data/log-None-ni

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

2012-03-27 Thread Marek Klein
2012/3/27 Julien Rioux > On 27/03/2012 2:58 PM, Marek Klein wrote: > >> >> However, I cannot find the log file :( >> >> On a default configuration this logfile would be in > /tmp/lilypond-autobuild > > Cheers, > Julien > > Here it is: http://gregoriana.sk/data/log-None-nice-make-test-baseline--j3

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

2012-03-27 Thread Julien Rioux
On 27/03/2012 2:58 PM, Marek Klein wrote: 2012/3/27 James I reset one of mine on the countdown http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 Try that. This is the output: Trying issue 2216 Found patch: (2216, '/home/marek/lilypond-patchy/issue5843060_6001.diff', 'AU: Documen

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

2012-03-27 Thread Marek Klein
2012/3/27 James > I reset one of mine on the countdown > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2216 > > Try that. > > This is the output: Trying issue 2216 Found patch: (2216, '/home/marek/lilypond-patchy/issue5843060_6001.diff', 'AU: Document all options for lilypond -dhelp')

Re: dist-check failure

2012-03-27 Thread Julien Rioux
On 26/03/2012 8:42 PM, Graham Percival wrote: ge.ja.html file from VC not distributed: lilypond-2.15.35/Documentation/misc/browser-language.nl.html file from VC not distributed: lilypond-2.15.35/input/regression/lilypond-book/include/example.ly file from VC not distributed: lilypond-2.15.35/input

Re: In-tree make check fails with lilypond-book include file regtest.

2012-03-27 Thread Julien Rioux
On 27/03/2012 9:37 AM, David Kastrup wrote: David Kastrup writes: commit ee70161485a2d2f347db3e29724a943c741ef524 Author: Julien Rioux Date: Wed Mar 21 09:13:55 2012 -0400 Regtests for lilypond-book include files located in subdir. causes the regtests to fail. Rerunning configure, m

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

2012-03-27 Thread Julien Rioux
On 27/03/2012 1:48 PM, Marek Klein wrote: Hi, 2012/3/23 Graham Percival Well, you need to figure out why git fetch in your $LILYPOND_GIT repository fails. git fetch works now... I need som new patch for play with... Marek ___ lilypond-deve

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

2012-03-27 Thread James
Marek, On 27 March 2012 18:48, Marek Klein wrote: > Hi, > 2012/3/23 Graham Percival >> >> >> Well, you need to figure out why >>  git fetch >> in your $LILYPOND_GIT repository fails. >> > > git fetch works now... > > I need som new patch for play with... > > Marek I reset one of mine on the cou

Re: volunteer for patchy new-patches

2012-03-27 Thread Marek Klein
Hi, 2012/3/23 Graham Percival > > Well, you need to figure out why > git fetch > in your $LILYPOND_GIT repository fails. > > git fetch works now... I need som new patch for play with... Marek ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org htt

Re: dist-check failure

2012-03-27 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "Graham Percival" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 1:42 AM > Subject: dist-check failure > > >> ge.ja.html >> file from VC not distributed: >> lilypond-2.15.35/Documentation/misc/browser-language.nl.html >> file from VC not dist

Re: German translation request

2012-03-27 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Marc Hohl" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:21 AM Subject: Re: German translation request Am 26.03.2012 12:15, schrieb James: Hello On 25 March 2012 14:10, Phil Holmes wrote: In Notation/wind.itely, please could the following be changed: http://

Re: dist-check failure

2012-03-27 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 1:42 AM Subject: dist-check failure ge.ja.html file from VC not distributed: lilypond-2.15.35/Documentation/misc/browser-language.nl.html file from VC not distributed: lilypond-2.15.35/input/regression/lil

Re: In-tree make check fails with lilypond-book include file regtest.

2012-03-27 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > commit ee70161485a2d2f347db3e29724a943c741ef524 > Author: Julien Rioux > Date: Wed Mar 21 09:13:55 2012 -0400 > > Regtests for lilypond-book include files located in subdir. > > > causes the regtests to fail. Rerunning configure, make clean and make > test does not

Re: And another include file error.

2012-03-27 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > A nuisance. Not repeatable so far, probably rerunning configure and make clean might have fixed the problem. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lily

Re: And another include file error.

2012-03-27 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/3/27 David Kastrup : > > A nuisance. > ... > (/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/tex/txi-es.tex no patterns for spanish) What causes this error? [For me] it is not clear from the log. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _

Re: Parsed object should be dead

2012-03-27 Thread David Kastrup
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > I'm getting a lot of: > > programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static > scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*) > continuing, cross fingers > > from current master. Is anyone else having this problem? http://code.google.com/p/lilypond

And another include file error.

2012-03-27 Thread David Kastrup
A nuisance. This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) entering extended mode (./texinfo-include-language-detection.texi (/usr/local/tmp/lilypond/tex/texinfo.tex Loading texinfo [version 2009-08-14.15]: pdf, fonts, markup, glyphs, page headings, tables, conditionals, indexin

In-tree make check fails with lilypond-book include file regtest.

2012-03-27 Thread David Kastrup
commit ee70161485a2d2f347db3e29724a943c741ef524 Author: Julien Rioux Date: Wed Mar 21 09:13:55 2012 -0400 Regtests for lilypond-book include files located in subdir. causes the regtests to fail. Rerunning configure, make clean and make test does not help. Parsing... /usr/local/tmp/lily

Re: German translation request

2012-03-27 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 26.03.2012 12:15, schrieb James: Hello On 25 March 2012 14:10, Phil Holmes wrote: In Notation/wind.itely, please could the following be changed: Die Liste aller möglichen Löcher und Einstellungen eines bestimmten Instruments kann auf der Kommandozeile oder in einer Log-Datei angezeigt werd

Re: Parsed object should be dead

2012-03-27 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > "m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > >> I'm getting a lot of: >> >> programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static >> scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*) >> continuing, cross fingers >> >> from current master. Is anyone else having this problem?

Re: Parsed object should be dead

2012-03-27 Thread David Kastrup
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes: > I'm getting a lot of: > > programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static > scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*) > continuing, cross fingers > > from current master. Is anyone else having this problem? I have not gotten lots of it, but

Parsed object should be dead

2012-03-27 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
I'm getting a lot of: programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*) continuing, cross fingers from current master. Is anyone else having this problem? Cheers, MS ___ lilypond-devel mail

Re: Fixes heights and pure heights of stems. (issue 4898044)

2012-03-27 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Mar 27, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > It seems that the /begin/ positions, the positions of the stem-ends attached > to the note heads, should be calculated the old way whether the beam > placement has been determined or not, so I'm inclined to remove if() above, > removing the need

Re: Fixes heights and pure heights of stems. (issue 4898044)

2012-03-27 Thread Keith OHara
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:14:15 -0700, Mike Solomon wrote: The code in lily/note-collision.cc:219 needs an update to adjust the stem beginning (issue 2441). I tried but I can't find the "pure callback for stem beginnings". ly:stem::pure-calc-stem-begin-position Okay, it is actually the not-