On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I bundled some extensions in a little package to try out. Some of these
> ideas might be interesting to include in lily.
> Here is a start of some docs, but just a little bit. I am working on it ...
> http://www.xn--schne
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> I think your proposal ought to have three steps for each set of modified
> glyphs:
>
> 1) Add glyph variants
> 2) Add infrastructure
> 3) Tweak glyph variants
>
> I suggest this, because I think that the tweaking may take a lot of time.
> If
On 4/6/12 5:33 AM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
>
>I know nothing about any Canadian ancestors of mine, but you never
>know... :)
>How did you like my article about LilyPond's weak sides and it's
>future development? Do you think that my concerns are valid?
I think your concerns about improving the a
For 20:00 MDT Sunday April 8
Nuttin'
Nada
Niente
No patches for review, so a restful weekend to you all!
Colin Senex
--
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both
hands.
You need to be able to throw something back.
-Maya Angelou, poet (1928- )
_
Release candidate anyone? Or have we already had a version bump? I can build
it, Graham, if you're over hours.
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 06:04:39PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> Release candidate anyone? Or have we already had a version bump? I can
> build it, Graham, if you're over hours.
It's already building. I've been trying to build it for the past
few days, but I can only do it after bootin
On 2012-04-05 04:16, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Thank you both for your help and insights -- I'll hope to put together an
application (while still keeping up with school etc. this week...)
Yup, there is little time left - only 30 hours.
Well, thanks for your help, but I didn't manage to write a comp
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Corey F wrote:
> On 2012-04-05 04:16, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you both for your help and insights -- I'll hope to put together an
>>> application (while still keeping up with school etc. this week...)
>>
>> Yup, there is little time left - only 30 hours.
On 4/5/12 12:51 PM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
>
>
>Does it make sense to replace the definitions in bar-line.cc/span-bar.cc
>with the scheme equivalents? If yes, I'd draw a patch and would include
>one example for integrating user-defined bar lines with the new approach
>as a snippet (once I get the das
Am 6. April 2012 23:04 schrieb Carl Sorensen :
> On 4/5/12 12:51 PM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Does it make sense to replace the definitions in bar-line.cc/span-bar.cc
>>with the scheme equivalents? If yes, I'd draw a patch and would include
>>one example for integrating user-defined bar lines
Am 06.04.2012 um 13:17 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
>> Dear community,
>>
>> I bundled some extensions in a little package to try out. Some of these
>> ideas might be interesting to include in lily.
>> Here is a start of some docs, but just a l
Folks,
I really appreciate that `make doc' doesn't flood the console.
However, right now I see a long line calling lilypond-book.py which
sits there for already more than 15 minutes without any progress
indicator at all. This is perhaps too extreme and suitable only to
the supercomputers some o
12 matches
Mail list logo
