Re: Doc: NR 1.2.3 Expl. manual accidentals + cadenzas (issue 5976056)

On 2012/04/29 09:18:28, Trevor Daniels wrote: LGTM, apart from the deleted index entries http://codereview.appspot.com/5976056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5976056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/

Re: Adding Bar Line types

Hello, On 1 May 2012 22:06, Thomas Morley wrote: ... > > Hi James, > > together with Marc I'm working on a completely new approach to > barlines, making available custom-barlines of all kind. > If success (not sure) it would be a major change to lilypond. > Currently there are several minor and m

Re: Doc: NR clarified \footnote command as a TextScript (issue 6137050)

Reviewers: Graham Percival, http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1050 Documentation/notation/input.itely:1050: footn

PATCH: Countdown to 20120503

For 20:00 MDT Thursday May 3 Issue 2487 : LyX integration of lilypond - R6132052 Cheers, Colin -- I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both hands. You need

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

Hello, On 1 May 2012 08:52, James wrote: > Hello, > > On 1 May 2012 08:31, Nick Payne wrote: >> On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne  wrote: On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote: In the following, even though I've t

Re: Add announcements to the upper right corner of the website (issue 6068045)

Graham Percival writes: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:18:23AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >> > Who is GNU_LilyPond anyway?  I thought it was, but I might be mistaken. >> >> I mean: I thought it was Jan. > > yeah, it's Jan. yes, /cur

Build: Fix the misc-file wildcard in website.make (issue 2499). (issue 6136057)

LGTM, please push directly to staging http://codereview.appspot.com/6136057/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote: Hello, On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne wrote: On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote: In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil was there: [...] I want the number there, b

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

Hello, On 1 May 2012 08:31, Nick Payne wrote: > On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne  wrote: >>> >>> On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >>> >>> In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket >>> stencil, the tuplet

Re: LilyPon's feta-braces font license

On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 06:30:43AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> I don't mind relicensing the font under a more permissible license. > >> Werner, do you know of a suitable license for open source fonts? > > > > Dual (multi) licensing is also possible: GNU GPL Font Exc. + OFL ? > > Yes, dua

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

Hello, On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne wrote: > On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket > stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil > was there: >>> >>> [...] I want the number there, but