Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
Pavel Roskin writes: > Quoting David Kastrup : > >> Now we just need to figure out which of the gazillion optimization >> options (listed in the assembly file) from O2 as compared to O1 makes >> the compilation go bad, and then we can add appropriate compiler >> options. >> >> We had to do this s

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
Pavel Roskin writes: > Quoting David Kastrup : > >> Pavel Roskin writes: >> >>> Quoting David Kastrup : >>> That would have been my most likely guess. Probably the "min" function call. >>> >>> You are absolultely right! I was able to work around the gcc bug by >>> making a separate f

Re: Fix MIDI output for Kievan (issue 6193043)

2012-05-04 Thread aleksandr . andreev
On 2012/05/04 19:33:06, benko.pal wrote: would you fix Vaticana and Mensural too? I've uploaded a patch that gets at Vaticana and Mensural as well. It seems that "Beam_performer" would not be necessary for the two, but I don't know about "Tie_performer" and "Slur_performer". It would probably

Re: Doc: NR clarified \footnote command as a TextScript (issue 6137050)

2012-05-04 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
On 2012/05/04 20:21:14, t.daniels_treda.co.uk wrote: wrote Friday, May 04, 2012 8:43 PM > > I think that makes more sense to explain. Definitely! I totally agree. Only allow articulation footnotes. Much clearer. Make a convert-ly rule that gives a warning if you ha

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread Pavel Roskin
Quoting David Kastrup : The optimizer does not appear interested in the result of the comparison when calculating the minimum value! There is no conditional path entered. That does not make all too much sense. That's a truly sharp eye! A diff between the i386 assembly without -fno-tree-vrp

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread Pavel Roskin
Quoting David Kastrup : Now we just need to figure out which of the gazillion optimization options (listed in the assembly file) from O2 as compared to O1 makes the compilation go bad, and then we can add appropriate compiler options. We had to do this sort of $&!# already for gcc 4.6, so our c

Re: Doc: NR clarified \footnote command as a TextScript (issue 6137050)

2012-05-04 Thread Trevor Daniels
wrote Friday, May 04, 2012 8:43 PM Ok, everybody will love me for my late thinking again. But here we go: :) we have two cases of footnotes: one that will attach itself to whatever happens at a given point of time, being an independent event. I propose we _always_ let them try to attach

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread Pavel Roskin
Quoting David Kastrup : Pavel Roskin writes: Quoting David Kastrup : That would have been my most likely guess. Probably the "min" function call. You are absolultely right! I was able to work around the gcc bug by making a separate function for Moment comparison and using it instead of

Re: Doc: NR clarified \footnote command as a TextScript (issue 6137050)

2012-05-04 Thread dak
Ok, everybody will love me for my late thinking again. But here we go: we have two cases of footnotes: one that will attach itself to whatever happens at a given point of time, being an independent event. Those footnotes, having a natural duration of 0, come (unless they are in simultaneous musi

Re: Fix MIDI output for Kievan (issue 6193043)

2012-05-04 Thread Benkő Pál
hi Aleksandr, 2012/5/4 : > For whatever reason, \alias Staff and \alias Voice do not bring in the > performers. If I comment out the line \consists "Note_performer", I get > no notes in the MIDI file, only the appropriate number of rests. > > I think this is also why Vaticana does not appear to w

Re: Doc: NR clarified \footnote command as a TextScript (issue 6137050)

2012-05-04 Thread pkx166h
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1050 Documentation/notation/input.itely:1050: footnote is being attached but can

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
Pavel Roskin writes: > Quoting David Kastrup : > >> That would have been my most likely guess. Probably the "min" function >> call. > > You are absolultely right! I was able to work around the gcc bug by > making a separate function for Moment comparison and using it instead > of min(): > > Mom

Re: Fix MIDI output for Kievan (issue 6193043)

2012-05-04 Thread Carl . D . Sorensen
On 2012/05/04 16:48:11, aleksandr.andreev wrote: Sorry, I'm a little green. Does this mean I need to change something in this patch? No. David was explaining why the \alias didn't cause the performers to be brought in automatically. My comment was invalid. Your patch is good. Thanks, Ca

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread Pavel Roskin
Quoting David Kastrup : That would have been my most likely guess. Probably the "min" function call. You are absolultely right! I was able to work around the gcc bug by making a separate function for Moment comparison and using it instead of min(): Moment min_moment (Moment m1, Moment

Re: Fix MIDI output for Kievan (issue 6193043)

2012-05-04 Thread dak
On 2012/05/04 16:48:11, aleksandr.andreev wrote: On 2012/05/04 15:34:17, dak wrote: > Aliases are only relevant for properties, I think. The initial values get > inherited, and any use of context property setting commands in the music or > context mods will accept changes for Voice into this

Re: Fix MIDI output for Kievan (issue 6193043)

2012-05-04 Thread aleksandr . andreev
On 2012/05/04 15:34:17, dak wrote: Aliases are only relevant for properties, I think. The initial values get inherited, and any use of context property setting commands in the music or context mods will accept changes for Voice into this context. But translators are independent. Sorry,

Re: Regarding LSR translation work

2012-05-04 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/5/4 Phil Holmes : > I think the way to do this would be to have makelsr.py extract the texidoc > and doctitle strings from the snippets and to put them into > Documentation/texidoc/.  In principle it would delete them from the snippet, > and then put them back in again, as I believe it does fo

Re: Fix MIDI output for Kievan (issue 6193043)

2012-05-04 Thread dak
http://codereview.appspot.com/6193043/diff/1/ly/performer-init.ly File ly/performer-init.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6193043/diff/1/ly/performer-init.ly#newcode88 ly/performer-init.ly:88: \consists "Dynamic_performer" On 2012/05/04 02:59:06, Carl wrote: Again, don't the performers

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > The optimizer does not appear interested in the result of the > comparison when calculating the minimum value! There is no > conditional path entered. That does not make all too much sense. Since you managed to boil this down to a single function and compilation, it sho

Re: Regarding LSR translation work

2012-05-04 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Federico Bruni" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 1:29 PM Subject: Re: Regarding LSR translation work 2012/4/24 Phil Holmes : 1) I don't understand what "say hello to LSR" means. sorry, I meant "goodbye to LSR" 2) I don't really un

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Pavel Roskin writes: > >> Quoting David Kastrup : >> >>> Pavel Roskin writes: >>> Quoting Pavel Roskin : >> I'll try to identify the function tomorrow. >>> >>> That would be welcome. I looked through the function right now and saw >>> no obvious problematic ca

Re: Spanish pondings

2012-05-04 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/5/4 Graham Percival : > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:33:05PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> On 4 mai 2012, at 14:29, Francisco Vila wrote: >> >> > 734f525 Web-es: Really make Spanish Pondings work. >> > 278124f Web-es: make Spanish Pondings work. >> > >> > Are those changes too invasive?

Re: Spanish pondings

2012-05-04 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/5/4 Phil Holmes : > Try http://lilypond.org/ No; this would activate the auto language feature. Go http://lilypond.org/index.html instead -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lil

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
Pavel Roskin writes: > Quoting David Kastrup : > >> Pavel Roskin writes: >> >>> Quoting Pavel Roskin : > >>> I'll try to identify the function tomorrow. >> >> That would be welcome. I looked through the function right now and saw >> no obvious problematic candidate. > > It's Simultaneous_music_

Re: Spanish pondings

2012-05-04 Thread Federico Bruni
2012/5/4 Phil Holmes : > Try http://lilypond.org/ Oh, I see: it works only if I click on English. Any other language doesn't show the tweets. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Spanish pondings

2012-05-04 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Federico Bruni" To: "Graham Percival" Cc: ; "LilyPond-Devel list" Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 3:08 PM Subject: Re: Spanish pondings 2012/5/4 Graham Percival : Also, could you make the font size slightly smaller? at the moment it's bigger than our "what is

Re: Spanish pondings

2012-05-04 Thread Federico Bruni
2012/5/4 Graham Percival : > Also, could you make the font size slightly smaller?  at the > moment it's bigger than our "what is lilypond" text. tweets have already gone live on the website? here I see that quick links have been removed but I can't see any tweet: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Doc

Re: Spanish pondings

2012-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:33:05PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: >> On 4 mai 2012, at 14:29, Francisco Vila wrote: >> >> > 734f525 Web-es: Really make Spanish Pondings work. >> > 278124f Web-es: make Spanish Pondings work. >> > >> > Are those changes too invasive

Re: Spanish pondings

2012-05-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:33:05PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: > On 4 mai 2012, at 14:29, Francisco Vila wrote: > > > 734f525 Web-es: Really make Spanish Pondings work. > > 278124f Web-es: make Spanish Pondings work. > > > > Are those changes too invasive? Yes. > I don't think it's a go

Re: Fix MIDI output for Kievan (issue 6193043)

2012-05-04 Thread aleksandr . andreev
For whatever reason, \alias Staff and \alias Voice do not bring in the performers. If I comment out the line \consists "Note_performer", I get no notes in the MIDI file, only the appropriate number of rests. I think this is also why Vaticana does not appear to work properly with MIDI. Try this ex

Re: Spanish pondings

2012-05-04 Thread Francisco Vila
2012/5/4 m...@apollinemike.com : > I don't think it's a good idea to have translations for pondings.  I'm > putting them up in whatever language they're sent to me.  The only two that > exist for the moment are in English, but they can certainly be in Spanish, in > which case everyone will see t

Re: Spanish pondings

2012-05-04 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On 4 mai 2012, at 14:29, Francisco Vila wrote: > Hi all, > > 734f525 Web-es: Really make Spanish Pondings work. > 278124f Web-es: make Spanish Pondings work. > > in translation branch makes the new web block in the main page to > appear in Spanish, but it touches some files which a plain transla

Re: Regtests for 2.15.38 - one significant difference

2012-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > See the attached PNG - is this deliberate? Yes. The change in output is deliberate and now corresponds with the input. Whether it makes sense to change the regtest because one usually would not want to see the string numbers, is a different question. The previous behav

Spanish pondings

2012-05-04 Thread Francisco Vila
Hi all, 734f525 Web-es: Really make Spanish Pondings work. 278124f Web-es: make Spanish Pondings work. in translation branch makes the new web block in the main page to appear in Spanish, but it touches some files which a plain translation should probably not. We don't currently have a proper tr

Regtests for 2.15.38 - one significant difference

2012-05-04 Thread Phil Holmes
See the attached PNG - is this deliberate? -- Phil Holmes <>___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Lilypond miscompiled on Fedora 17

2012-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
Pavel Roskin writes: > Quoting Pavel Roskin : > >> Fedora 17 i386 has exactly the same problem. >> >> Let me try to find the file that needs to be compiled with -O1. I have >> some ideas how to bisect the problem. I want to write a wrapper around >> g++ that starts adding -O1 to the command lin

Re: Doc: NR clarified \footnote command as a TextScript (issue 6137050)

2012-05-04 Thread tdanielsmusic
Hi James Alternative text suggested. Trevor http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1050 Documentation/notation/input.