Hello all,
I've successfully build Lilypond itself from source, but when I try to make doc,
the build hangs on the first file it attempts to compile:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/joseph/code/lily/build/input/regression'
LILYPOND_VERSION=2.15.39 /usr/bin/python
/home/joseph/code/lily/scr
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Rushton Wakeling"
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 8:37 AM
Subject: Doc build hanging (with memory leak?)
Hello all,
I've successfully build Lilypond itself from source, but when I try to
make doc, the build hangs on the first file it attempts to
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Thierry Coduys
> Subject: LoMus 2012
> Date: 12 mai 2012 12:15:03 HAEC
> To: m...@mikesolomon.org
>
> Dear Mike,
>
> The jury wishes to congratulate you on your LilyPond open source software,
> that won the First Prize at the LoMus 2012 contest.
>
> A cheque o
"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Thierry Coduys
>
> Subject: LoMus 2012
>
> Date: 12 mai 2012 12:15:03 HAEC
>
> To: m...@mikesolomon.org
>
>
>
> Dear Mike,
>
> The jury wishes to congratulate you on your Lil
Hi Mike,
Congratulations! (To everyone!!)
Best regards,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 12 mai 2012, at 12:37, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>From: Thierry Coduys
>>
>>Subject: LoMus 2012
>>
>>Date: 12 mai 2012 12:15:03 HAEC
>>
>>To: m...@mikesolomon.org
>>
>>
>>
>>Dear Mike,
>>
>>The jur
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> I wouldn't mind using it to finish my skyline work! That'll easily be
> five weeks of my life (around 1 000 €), and it'd allow me to focus on
> something other than fundraising...
Well, the agreement was "whoever submits and collects, decides how to
distribute"
On 12 mai 2012, at 13:00, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> I wouldn't mind using it to finish my skyline work! That'll easily be
>> five weeks of my life (around 1 000 €), and it'd allow me to focus on
>> something other than fundraising...
>
> Well, the agreement w
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> On 12 mai 2012, at 13:00, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>>
>>> I wouldn't mind using it to finish my skyline work! That'll easily be
>>> five weeks of my life (around 1 000 €), and it'd allow me to focus on
>>> something other than
On 12/05/12 11:59, Phil Holmes wrote:
The doc build now issues far less "chatter" than it used to. With a single core
machine, it could well go an hour without a single message. If it's using CPU
and taking memory, be patient. If there's no response after a day, let us know.
OK, cool. It's nic
Joseph Rushton Wakeling writes:
> /home/joseph/code/lily/build/scripts/build/out/run-and-check
> "DEPTH=../../.. AJAX_SEARCH= TOP_SRC_DIR=/home/joseph/code/lily
> PERL_UNICODE=SD - echo texi2html not found --error-limit=0
[...]
> The logfile reads:
>
>build/scripts/build/out/run-and-check:
On 12/05/12 13:37, David Kastrup wrote:
You are running a command
- echo texi2html not found
and that does not quite work. It would appear that the error handling
for a missing texi2html script is totally awful. I'd install texi2html
and rerun configure.
Texi2html was already installed
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> However, I am opposed to any "official" (GOP or GLISS) proposals
> being decided at such a venue.
Decided, absolutely not.
Discussed, definitely.
> Similarly, we could have informal discussions about GOP or GLISS
> issues, to find out wha
Joseph,
On 12 May 2012 12:56, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 12/05/12 13:37, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> You are running a command
>>
>> - echo texi2html not found
>>
>> and that does not quite work. It would appear that the error handling
>> for a missing texi2html script is totally awf
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:51 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> I wouldn't mind using it to finish my skyline work! That'll easily be five
> weeks of my life (around 1 000 €), and it'd allow me to focus on something
> other than fundraising...
I'm ok with this, too! Let's see what others wil
>> The jury wishes to congratulate you on your LilyPond open source
>> software, that won the First Prize at the LoMus 2012 contest.
Great!
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilyp
On 12 mai 2012, at 14:38, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:51 PM, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
>> I wouldn't mind using it to finish my skyline work! That'll easily be five
>> weeks of my life (around 1 000 €), and it'd allow me to focus on something
>> other than fundraisi
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Make a ponding of the award, and point to the contest site (if any) for
> the details. Like the awarded sum. I'd find it weird to flash numbers
> on our main website.
I think this qualifies for a news item - after all, it's *LilyPond*
who
On 12 mai 2012, at 14:53, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Make a ponding of the award, and point to the contest site (if any) for
>> the details. Like the awarded sum. I'd find it weird to flash numbers
>> on our main website.
>
> I think this q
On 5/12/12 4:37 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>
>>
>> w00t!
>> Mazal tov to everyone!
>
>Graham's worst fears... If I remember correctly, we had two
>applications for the Google Summer of Code, and only one has been
>accepted under the GNU umbrella. Before disp
On 12/05/12 14:29, James wrote:
Assuming you are building from current master then make doc does
compile as all new checkins go to staging tree first and sit there
while a script runs (as it happens on my computer) that compiles
staging through all the tests and if it passes them all (and that
in
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 5/12/12 4:37 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>>"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>>
>>>
>>> w00t!
>>> Mazal tov to everyone!
>>
>>Graham's worst fears... If I remember correctly, we had two
>>applications for the Google Summer of Code, and only one has been
>>accepted
David Kastrup writes:
> Well, I was going to send news of it around, but as of now, there is
> nothing to be seen yet: http://concours.afim-asso.org/home.php>.
> Hope they get their act together eventually, since this is definitely
> nice promotion material.
/me too; please update when there's a
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Well, I was going to send news of it around, but as of now, there is
>> nothing to be seen yet: http://concours.afim-asso.org/home.php>.
>> Hope they get their act together eventually, since this is definitely
>> nice promotion material.
>
>
On 12 mai 2012, at 15:55, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>>> Well, I was going to send news of it around, but as of now, there is
>>> nothing to be seen yet: http://concours.afim-asso.org/home.php>.
>>> Hope they get their act together eventually,
New patch set uploaded for the <> change.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1050
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1050: is to be attached but in t
Janek Warchoł writes:
> I think this qualifies for a news item - after all, it's *LilyPond*
> who won. Graham?
Submit to lwn.net etc; when there's something to point at.
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAc
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 01:56:33PM +0200, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 12/05/12 13:37, David Kastrup wrote:
> >and that does not quite work. It would appear that the error handling
> >for a missing texi2html script is totally awful. I'd install texi2html
> >and rerun configure.
>
> Texi2h
hello,
On 12 May 2012 14:24, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 12/05/12 14:29, James wrote:
>>
>> Assuming you are building from current master then make doc does
>> compile as all new checkins go to staging tree first and sit there
>> while a script runs (as it happens on my computer) that com
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:53:58PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Make a ponding of the award, and point to the contest site (if any) for
> > the details. Like the awarded sum. I'd find it weird to flash numbers
> > on our main website.
>
Hello,
On 12 May 2012 16:41, Graham Percival wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> James: could you either make this change yourself (after
> double-checking the details), or add a tracker item for it?
> I think you can push this directly.
Thanks Marc.
This has now been fixed and wil
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:02 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
>>> I wouldn't mind using it to finish my skyline work! That'll easily be
>>> five weeks of my life (around 1 000 €), and it'd allow me to focus on
>>> something other than fundraising...
>>
>> Well, the agreement was "whoever submits
See inline. One more patch will be needed.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1050
Documentation/notation/
LGTM, I think this can be pushed immediately to staging.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6206057/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: Graham Percival,
Message:
On 2012/05/12 17:08:25, Graham Percival wrote:
LGTM, I think this can be pushed immediately to staging.
Willdo.
Description:
Add mail aliases for Carl, Colin, Janek, and Pál, for the sake of git
shortlog
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com
Looks good to me.
I honestly tried to use a footnote a couple months ago, but gave up
trying to figure it out. Now I think the docs are pretty clear.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/8003/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://code
On 2012/05/12 18:36:56, Keith wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1073
Documentation/notation/inp
On 2012/05/12 19:11:44, dak wrote:
On 2012/05/12 18:36:56, Keith wrote:
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
> File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
>
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/input.i
On 2012/05/12 19:25:34, dak wrote:
On 2012/05/12 19:11:44, dak wrote:
> On 2012/05/12 18:36:56, Keith wrote:
> >
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
> > File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
> >
> >
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/
On Sat, 12 May 2012 12:11:45 -0700, wrote:
\breathe
c2
\footnote #'(0.5 . 0.5) #'BreathingSign \markup { Breathe }
Not exactly the most intuitive order I have to say.
True. Good to document it, I guess.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/8003/Documentation/not
New patch set uploaded
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/8003/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/8003/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1044
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1044: Auto
Big change, still very clear.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/14003/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/14003/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1048
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1
Reviewers: ,
Message:
tenor-ukulele-tuning and baritone-ukulele-tuning fixed, the string order
was reversed.
Description:
Fix ukulele tunings
Reverse the order of the chord for the tenor-ukulele-tuning and
baritone-ukulele-tuning
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/6206060/
Af
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/14003/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6137050/diff/14003/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1075
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1075: \footnote #'(0.5 , 0.5)
#'
http://codereview.appspot.com/6200068/diff/2001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6200068/diff/2001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode331
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:331: a4*2/3 gis a
Oh yes.
On 2012/05/13 02:29:54, choan.galvez wrote:
tenor-ukulele-tuning and baritone-ukulele-tuning fixed, the string
order was
reversed.
In the user group, a more extensive change was/is discussed that could
also be worthwhile. This patch here, in contrast, is just a bug fix.
As such, applying it
Reviewers: Keith,
http://codereview.appspot.com/6200068/diff/2001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6200068/diff/2001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode331
Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:331: a4*
48 matches
Mail list logo
