Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "ArnoldTheresius"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 8:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055)
>
>
>> Graham Percival-3 wrote:
>>>
>>> http://codereview.appspot.com/6398055/diff/1/Documentation/de/nota
Looks like LilyPond defines two line-thicknesses,
one for staff-line thickness in each StaffSymbol,
and one (confusingly called staffline in C) for bar-line width in
paper.scm.
If the barlines use the layout thickness, as they mostly did in the C
version, then they line up between staves of diffe
> A description of the issue. For new issues, this is usually filled in
> with the commit message(s) automatically.
OK, I did it but failed when asking for :
Could not find stored credentials
/home/fred/.lilypond-project-hosting-login
Please enter login details manually
Username (google account
Frédéric Bron writes:
>> Using git-cl will usually be the easiest way to make use of that
>> infrastructure.
>
> OK, I have installed git-cl and tried git cl upload master but I gvim
> opened with a temporary file in /tmp. What should I write in this
> file?
A description of the issue. For new
`make check` succeeded for me, and I cannot see anything that would
cause a problem for the patchy script.
The code looks fine; regression tests have a minor problem.
I compared this with the previous patch at
http://codereview.appspot.com/6351107/diff2/2003:8001/lily/bar-line.cc
http://codere
> Using git-cl will usually be the easiest way to make use of that
> infrastructure.
OK, I have installed git-cl and tried git cl upload master but I gvim
opened with a temporary file in /tmp. What should I write in this
file?
Frédéric
___
lilypond-deve
Frédéric Bron writes:
>> If you are familiar with various linux utilities, you
>> could follow the instructions here
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/summary-for-experienced-developers
>
> Do you mean that with git-cl, I could submit a patch that would be
> automatically
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 09:45:48PM +0200, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > If you are familiar with various linux utilities, you
> > could follow the instructions here
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/summary-for-experienced-developers
>
> Do you mean that with git-cl, I could s
> If you are familiar with various linux utilities, you
> could follow the instructions here
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/summary-for-experienced-developers
Do you mean that with git-cl, I could submit a patch that would be
automatically added to staging if successful?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 06:42:15PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> and we'd need A and DNS records for something like
> builder.lilypond.org or builder.lilynet.net to make the machine
> reachable more easily than just 194.254.171.80.
I recommend lilynet.net.
- Graham
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:52:42PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> If one of lilynet.net
> or lilypond.org email provider, or maybe GNU, can be used with whichever
> combination of 587 port/TLS/SSL/authentification method is needed,
> that's good, if not, a simple solution is creating a dedicated Gm
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:23:32PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> our issue tracker went
>
> 500. That’s an error.
*shrug* happens occasionally.
> Do we have a contingency plan?
Nope. I know that it's possible to get some information as a csv
file, and I'd be surprised if there weren't o
http://codereview.appspot.com/6432063/diff/1/Documentation/notation/keyboards.itely
File Documentation/notation/keyboards.itely (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6432063/diff/1/Documentation/notation/keyboards.itely#oldcode457
Documentation/notation/keyboards.itely:457:
{indicating-cross-sta
Sorry, our Frog Meister should be helping you with this. I've
cc'd him. If you are familiar with various linux utilities, you
could follow the instructions here
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/summary-for-experienced-developers
otherwise just wait and hope that somebody (
Just to be sure I understand correctly!
http://codereview.appspot.com/6432063/diff/1/Documentation/notation/keyboards.itely
File Documentation/notation/keyboards.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6432063/diff/1/Documentation/notation/keyboards.itely#newcode426
Documentation/notation/
Jean-Charles Malahieude writes:
> Le 23/07/2012 19:23, David Kastrup disait :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> our issue tracker went
>>
>> Google
>>
>> 500. That’s an error.
>>
>> The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
>>
>> If the problem persists, please report
Hi,
any chance to have this patch reviewed?
Cheers,
Frédéric
-- Forwarded message --
From: Frédéric Bron
Date: 2012/7/11
Subject: error while running make check (g++ 4.7.0): missing include of unistd.h
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
I wanted to run regression tests and compare befor
Le 23/07/2012 19:23, David Kastrup disait :
Hi,
our issue tracker went
Google
500. That’s an error.
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
If the problem persists, please report your problem and mention this
error message and the query
Il giorno lun, 23/07/2012 alle 19.25 +0200, David Kastrup ha scritto:
> Maybe running gerrit on it would be an option?
This sounds an excellent idea. My concern is which SMTP server to use
to handle the email sending load, as the MSH Paris Nord is a service
provider for Universities and Research
John Mandereau writes:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> I'm about to make lilypond-patchy-staging work on MSH Paris Nord server.
> It is an old computer (Pentium 4 at 2 GHz, 2 GB of RAM),
> so don't expect it to run much more than a slow but sure and regular
> merger of staging into master, and poss
Hi,
our issue tracker went
Google
500. That’s an error.
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
If the problem persists, please report your problem and mention this
error message and the query that caused it. That’s all we know.
Amusingly, the
Dear fellow developers,
I'm about to make lilypond-patchy-staging work on MSH Paris Nord server.
It is an old computer (Pentium 4 at 2 GHz, 2 GB of RAM),
so don't expect it to run much more than a slow but sure and regular
merger of staging into master, and possibly tester of patches and
translati
Reviewers: Graham Percival, Trevor Daniels,
Message:
Please review my attempt at some documentation.
Description:
Updated the documentation to take account of the new cross staff stem
feature.
Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/6432063/
Affected files:
M Documentation/change
Phil Holmes-2 wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "ArnoldTheresius"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 8:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055)
>
>
>> Graham Percival-3 wrote:
>>>
>>> http://codereview.appspot.com/6398055/diff/1/Documentation/de/nota
- Original Message -
From: "ArnoldTheresius"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055)
Graham Percival-3 wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6398055/diff/1/Documentation/de/notation/repeats.itely#newcode245
Documentation/de/n
And here is one update worth noting: I just detected that Waltrop town
has not bothered taking our meeting into account and produced a slight
scheduling conflict: http://www.waltroper-parkfest.de/> (sorry,
apparently only a German link).
While it is nice that we have a separate evening entertainm
Am 23.07.2012 10:30, schrieb Marc Hohl:
[...]
The x-extent of all bar lines is identical except for the dashed
bar line (the newer version is centered around x=0, but the width is
identical),
so IIUC, rounding errors may not a problem here.
Corrected in the latest patch set.
Interestingly,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 03:26:22AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> An even better solution would be to
> provide a big square with four small digits in it, giving the
> character's Unicode value.
>
An even better solution would be for Texinfo to support these characters.
- Just saying - I would
Am 21.07.2012 15:02, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com:
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-needs_work
Comment #35 on issue 1320 by d...@gnu.org: Enhancement:
user-customizable barlines through a Scheme interface.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1320#c35
Patchy the autobot
Graham Percival-3 wrote:
>
>
> ...
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6398055/diff/1/Documentation/de/notation/repeats.itely#newcode245
> Documentation/de/notation/repeats.itely:245: @cindex ndex \inStaffSegno
> what's an ndex?
>
> ...
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6398055/
>
> _
30 matches
Mail list logo