PATCH: Countdown to 20121023

For 20:00 MDT Tuesday October 23 Enhancement: Issue 2445 : Center a number above a measure - R 6730044 Issue 2914 : Patch: prev

Busy Developers' Summary 2: what happened this week

Hi all, second issue of BDS - this week was definitely less busy than previous one. __ It seems that we're finally close to removing misleading & deprecated old website (lilypond.org/web/) - see http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1272 It was decide

Re: New bar line interface: include whichBar in convert-ly rule for bar line changes (issue 6695046)

Thanks, Marc! i suggest to abbreviate the committish (first 10 digits should be enough - git recognizes abbreviated committishes as long as they are unique) - first line of the commit message should be around 50-60 chars for the sake of nice display in logs. best & sorry for nitpicking & LGTM, J

Re: New bar line interface: include whichBar in convert-ly rule for bar line changes (issue 6695046)

Reviewers: janek, Message: On 2012/10/21 16:46:36, janek wrote: Was it not for Graham Percival, to whom i dedicate all my code reviews, i would have not find enough willpower to write a review! (seriously!) :) So, Marc, the problem is that convert-ly rule didn't convert commands involving

New bar line interface: take whichBar into account (issue 6695046)

Was it not for Graham Percival, to whom i dedicate all my code reviews, i would have not find enough willpower to write a review! (seriously!) :) So, Marc, the problem is that convert-ly rule didn't convert commands involving whicBar context property? Like, \set Staff.whichBar = \"|:\" should be

Re: make scripts on Windows (cygwin)

2012/10/21 David Kastrup : > Federico Bruni writes: > >> [..] >> >> I've installed Cygwin and the packages needed for compiling (well, I >> hope so). > > If you are not interested in wasting the rest of your week (and probably > the next month) throwing good time after bad time fighting things tha

Re: 2.17.5?

"Phil Holmes" writes: > For everyone's information, please note that the website is in a > somewhat unusual state. Something (I don't know what - waiting on > GP's thoughts) seems to have gone wrong with the website upload, and > so most of it shows 2.17.4, but the manuals etc. are at 2.17.5. I

Re: Create \temporary for doing overrides without pop-first set (issue 6687044)

There was some controversy with this patch, but it was counted down and noone found anything wrong with the actual code. Some people are not sure whether we want to have \temporary or something else, but they can change it in the future if they want. For now, this patch adds something that is mi

Re: Fix extra spacing in Kievan notation (issue 6684051)

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:06 PM, wrote: > The GSoC issues do not deal with packed spacing, so this is somewhat > different, though related. Do you have any ideas for how this issue > could be addressed differently? Has there been any work on the various > GSoC issues? Yes, and it waits to be me

Re: 2.17.5?

- Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes" To: ; "David Kastrup" Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 6:24 PM Subject: Re: 2.17.5? - Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:46 PM Subject: 2.17.5? Hi, can we get a release of 2.17.5 s

Re: [translations] Git translation branch policy change: merge with and from stable/2.16

2012/10/21 Jean-Charles Malahieude : >> So I really think we should move translations over, and live with the >> documentation of 2.16 being the best we could make it for 2.16. >> > > Do we translators first update what you just merged from stable? I'm on it > at the present (my wife is conducting

Re: [translations] Git translation branch policy change: merge with and from stable/2.16

Jean-Charles Malahieude writes: > Le 21/10/2012 13:15, David Kastrup disait : > >> So I really think we should move translations over, and live with the >> documentation of 2.16 being the best we could make it for 2.16. > > Do we translators first update what you just merged from stable? I'm > on

Re: make scripts on Windows (cygwin)

Federico Bruni writes: > I'd like to update the italian translation before 2.16.1 release. > I have a problem: I'm abroad until Friday and I only have a Windows laptop. > > I guess that you will recommend LilyDev. Not tried yet, as I'm not > really interested in compiling Lilypond. > I just need

Re: [translations] Git translation branch policy change: merge with and from stable/2.16

Le 21/10/2012 13:15, David Kastrup disait : Jean-Charles Malahieude writes: That's what I feared since the freeze: having to maintain two sets of translations. I think that we will likely leave the stable branch behind soon with regard to documentation maintenance. Our documentation is impro

Re: Still alive

"Trevor Daniels" writes: > m...@mikesolomon.org: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:29 AM > > On 9 oct. 2012, at 11:39, Trevor Daniels wrote: >>> >>> m...@mikesolomon.org wrote Tuesday, October 09, 2012 9:19 AM >>> Just a quick ping to let you know that I'm not dead - I've been swamped w/

make scripts on Windows (cygwin)

I'd like to update the italian translation before 2.16.1 release. I have a problem: I'm abroad until Friday and I only have a Windows laptop. I guess that you will recommend LilyDev. Not tried yet, as I'm not really interested in compiling Lilypond. I just need to be able to run some make commands

Re: [translations] Git translation branch policy change: merge with and from stable/2.16

Jean-Charles Malahieude writes: > Le 20/10/2012 20:33, Francisco Vila disait : >> 2012/10/20 David Kastrup : >>> >>> If it is ok with people, I'd propose the following course in order to >>> get the ball rolling again: >>> >>> I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation. That should be unproblematic

Re: [translations] Git translation branch policy change: merge with and from stable/2.16

Le 20/10/2012 20:33, Francisco Vila disait : 2012/10/20 David Kastrup : If it is ok with people, I'd propose the following course in order to get the ball rolling again: I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation. That should be unproblematic. Then I'll merge translation into staging. This will

Re: 2.16.1

2012/10/21 David Kastrup : > I hope translati...@lilynet.net is not a dead list (or did its list > server die, or is it "moderated" with no moderator ever approving > posts?). At any rate, I sent several messages. The first I can only > find in my mailing logs (Friday), but not in my mailing list

Re: 2.16.1

David Kastrup writes: >> I'll merge stable/2.16 into translation. That should be >> unproblematic. > > The only reaction to that was a mail from Francisco which did not much > to address this part of my plan. > > I did this right now, and afterwards discovered that there is a branch > translatio

Re: 2.16.1

David Kastrup writes: > I hope translati...@lilynet.net is not a dead list (or did its list > server die, or is it "moderated" with no moderator ever approving > posts?). At any rate, I sent several messages. At least the second one with cc to several individuals. > From: David Kastrup > Subj

Re: 2.16.1

Federico Bruni writes: > Il giorno 21/ott/2012 05:17, "David Kastrup" ha scritto: >> >> "Phil Holmes" writes: >> >> > David, >> > >> > I see you've done a lot of moving updates into 2.16.1. When do you >> > expect to want a release for this? >> >> I've asked on the translator list whether they