Hmm, if i'm reading git log correctly, i'm too late to give my LGTM to
pushing these changes... ;)
Anyway, i'm very happy to see this change!
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:07 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
In this case since both searches fail I
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Hmm, if i'm reading git log correctly, i'm too late to give my LGTM to
pushing these changes... ;)
Anyway, i'm very happy to see this change!
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:07 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
David,
I don't mind making the changes, but I'm running into some problems. I
used git pull -r before making a patch set and uploading to rietveld,
but looking over the patch set there I see that other changes have found
their way in--including your check-grob-path function.
I'm probably
On 2012/10/31 11:41:19, david.nalesnik wrote:
David,
I don't mind making the changes, but I'm running into some problems.
I used git
pull -r before making a patch set and uploading to rietveld, but
looking over
the patch set there I see that other changes have found their way
Thank you--I am a bit worried!
Speaking of patch, when I run git format-patch I get six separate
patches. Is there any way to compress them into one so this is more
convenient for you?
-David
https://codereview.appspot.com/6730044/
___
http://codereview.appspot.com/6730044/diff/40002/ly/engraver-init.ly
File ly/engraver-init.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6730044/diff/40002/ly/engraver-init.ly#newcode88
ly/engraver-init.ly:88: \consists Footnote_engraver
Any idea where this line is from? It just appears in the
On 2012/10/31 11:55:12, david.nalesnik wrote:
Thank you--I am a bit worried!
Speaking of patch, when I run git format-patch I get six separate
patches. Is
there any way to compress them into one so this is more convenient for
you?
-David
Try if you can git send-email to work for you.
Hello,
This patch add español as an alias for espanol
which allows
\language español
{ do' re' mi' }
http://codereview.appspot.com/6811060/
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:01 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure if i understand you correctly.
Currently (checked with 2.17.3) i can write this in LilyPond code
(verbatim):
It likely does not pass 2.17.6.
good to know.
{
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
{
\override Stem #'my-funky-property = #5
}
ok, i see that doing what i demonstrated was a bad idea. Is it
possible to define (create) a new property from the user level? I
don't recall any information about this.
I don't think we have an
2012/10/31 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
[...]
Is it
possible to define (create) a new property from the user level? I
don't recall any information about this.
Janek
see:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-05/msg00543.html
But I didn't try it with latest
11 matches
Mail list logo
