LGTM by reading only
http://codereview.appspot.com/6814115/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Il 09/11/2012 18:55, Janek Warchoł ha scritto:
- split the remainder of the page between "features for hire"
(one-time bounties) and "continuous support" (giving money to an
individual without setting what exactly he has to do, just to enable
him to continue his work - what we do with David now).
Federico Bruni writes:
> Il 09/11/2012 18:55, Janek Warchoł ha scritto:
>> - split the remainder of the page between "features for hire"
>> (one-time bounties) and "continuous support" (giving money to an
>> individual without setting what exactly he has to do, just to enable
>> him to continue h
Il 10/11/2012 11:04, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Federico Bruni writes:
I suggest putting a link to the list of bounties:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=label%3ABounty
I think the idea of "Bounty" was pretty much retired. I don't think any
have been proposed in the last
Federico Bruni writes:
> I think that any user will be happier to invest some money on a
> specific feature he/she really wants rather than on "general
> development".
> Why wasting this opportunity?
Because things that are easy to do very much tend to be promptly done on
the user list and/or th
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; "David Kastrup"
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: 2.16.1
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:02:04PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Friday, Novem
2012/11/9 Phil Holmes :
> I've just built 2.16.1 and will be uploading it later this evening. All
> seems OK except I tried to create a regtest comparison versus 2.16.0 and
> instead got a comparison of 2.17.6 versus 2.16.0.
Grenouille is sending daily reports of failed builds. The message is
not
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6827056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
i think we add "web: " at the beginning of website commits.
Also, i'd put this announcement below 2.16 announcement (because it's
old). But i don't insist.
Otherwise LGTM
Janek
http://codereview.appspot.com/6828049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
l
I've looked a bit at one random file. Looks mostly good to me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6814080/diff/1/scm/define-music-display-methods.scm
File scm/define-music-display-methods.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6814080/diff/1/scm/define-music-display-methods.scm#newcode111
scm/d
Reviewers: janek,
Message:
On 2012/11/10 13:52:09, janek wrote:
i think we add "web: " at the beginning of website commits.
Also, i'd put this announcement below 2.16 announcement (because it's
old).
Unfortunately, the report is old, but the announcement isn't. If people
check the news reg
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:16 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Janek Warchoł writes:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
For a flute, I used \clef "G^(8)" to indicate that the player may
play it
one
octave above (preferred in combination with concert flute) or as
written
(when play
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Colin Campbell wrote:
> Issue 2868: Patch: Various clean-ups in stems and beams. - R 6813095
Tracker an Rietveld issue numbers don't match here. Rietveld for 2868
should be http://codereview.appspot.com/6584045 i think.
Janek
This patch is a bit too complex for me to understand after just reading,
sorry :(
But i didn't spot anything wrong.
Janek
http://codereview.appspot.com/6584045/diff/27001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6584045/diff/27001/scm/output-lib.scm#newc
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Vila"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: 2.16.1
2012/11/9 Phil Holmes :
I've just built 2.16.1 and will be uploading it later this evening. All
seems OK except I tried to create a regtest compa
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc: "Benjamin CL" ; "LilyPond Developmet Team"
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [talk] suggestion: redesign "sponsoring" page.
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 07:07:53PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Janek
2012/11/10 Phil Holmes :
> I've updated the stats pages.
Some time ago I offered Graham to contribute two additional graphs.
Here they are; see them in
http://paconet.org/lilypond-statistics/authors.html#authors_by_year-month
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Vila"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Graham Percival" ; "David Kastrup"
; "Benjamin CL" ; "LilyPond
Developmet Team"
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [talk] suggestion: redesign "sponsoring" page.
2012/11/10 Phil Holmes :
I've
2012/11/10 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Francisco Vila"
>> Some time ago I offered Graham to contribute two additional graphs.
>> Here they are; see them in
>> http://paconet.org/lilypond-statistics/authors.html#authors_by_year-month
> This patch would be applied to the git
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/11/10 Phil Holmes :
>> - Original Message - From: "Francisco Vila"
>>> Some time ago I offered Graham to contribute two additional graphs.
>>> Here they are; see them in
>>> http://paconet.org/lilypond-statistics/authors.html#authors_by_year-month
>
>> This
2012/11/10 David Kastrup :
> Francisco Vila writes:
>
>> 2012/11/10 Phil Holmes :
>>> - Original Message - From: "Francisco Vila"
Some time ago I offered Graham to contribute two additional graphs.
Here they are; see them in
http://paconet.org/lilypond-statistics/authors.ht
2012/11/10 Francisco Vila :
> It is easy to test how smart it is: try to apply both patches, which
> differ in line numbers, to the same file in
>
> http://repo.or.cz/w/gitstats.git/blob_plain/e6b30583:/gitstats
>
> (this is latest git version)
Anyway, for your convenience, here is my patched ve
Am 10.11.2012 14:59, schrieb janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
I've looked a bit at one random file. Looks mostly good to me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6814080/diff/1/scm/define-music-display-methods.scm
File scm/define-music-display-methods.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6814080/d
23 matches
Mail list logo
