Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
>> change is here https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/
>
> +1
>
> One nitpick
>
> +under the GPL+Font exception and the SIL Open Font License (OFL). A copy
> +of the OFL is in the file LICENSE.OFL.
>
> There is an end of line space
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> change is here https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/
+1
One nitpick
+under the GPL+Font exception and the SIL Open Font License (OFL). A copy
+of the OFL is in the file LICENSE.OFL.
There is an end of line space missing, but as the `A copy' sticks out
beyon
Ben Rudiak-Gould writes:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:43 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>>> ...it seems like the
>>> question is why we don't download the binaries directly and bundle
>>> them with LilyPond.
>>
>> Because then all bets are off concerning comparable res
See https://codereview.appspot.com/1579041#msg3
I'm not sure Neil is correct in his comment, but it would be cleaner to
modify the code that responded to Neil's suggestion, rather than prevent
it from taking effect downstream.
https://codereview.appspot.com/6972044/diff/1/lily/metronome-engrave
On 19 December 2012 22:58, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 19 December 2012 22:54, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks. By the way, is the 2-hourly run on right now? After fixing the
>> docs and getting a successful make doc run (big time hole), I pushed to
>> staging again somewhat more than 2 hou
Hello,
On 19 December 2012 22:54, David Kastrup wrote:
> Thanks. By the way, is the 2-hourly run on right now? After fixing the
> docs and getting a successful make doc run (big time hole), I pushed to
> staging again somewhat more than 2 hours ago, so I am somewhat worried
> that something b
James writes:
> Well merge does a full doc build and your checkin was in master
> already so must have made it through the make doc in that case.
No, it wasn't. It was on top of the stuff of Jean-Charles that had
already migrated from staging to master, and this stuff (multiple
commits) on top
Hello,
On 19 December 2012 20:21, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>> You don't need to explain Jean-Charles, I was just making very
>> uneducated observations/guesses.
>>
>> Anyway, regardless of this we had all agreed to not push anything
>> directly to master.
>
> Apparently he didn't.
Hello
On 19 December 2012 20:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> change is here https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/
>
> --
> Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
>
> ___
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> lilypond-devel@gnu.org
change is here https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
James writes:
> You don't need to explain Jean-Charles, I was just making very
> uneducated observations/guesses.
>
> Anyway, regardless of this we had all agreed to not push anything
> directly to master.
Apparently he didn't.
> Just another uneducated guess based on a simple fact that everyth
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:43 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>> ...it seems like the
>> question is why we don't download the binaries directly and bundle
>> them with LilyPond.
>
> Because then all bets are off concerning comparable results.
Not if you bundled the same
Hello,
On 19 December 2012 18:10, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> Le 19/12/2012 12:14, David Kastrup disait :
>>
>> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
>> that has been posted to gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel as well.
>>
>>
>> James writes:
>>
>>> On 19 December 2012 08:11, J
Le 19/12/2012 12:14, David Kastrup disait :
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel as well.
James writes:
On 19 December 2012 08:11, James wrote:
Hello,
author Jean-Charles Malahieude
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:23:13 + (1
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been submitted
by the Catalan team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/lilypond/ca.po
(We can arrange things so tha
LGTM
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/6929046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
James writes:
> On 19 December 2012 08:11, James wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> author Jean-Charles Malahieude
>> Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:23:13 + (19:23 +0100)
>> committer Jean-Charles Malahieude
>> Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:23:13 + (19:23 +0100)
>> commit 12c6693055728e69dce5c4e5a4a2b5f71180a5
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:39:09PM -0800, Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote:
> I rewrote midi.c in Python and tested it on the largest midi file in
> IMSLP [1]. On my laptop it takes about 200 ms instead of 50 ms to load
> the file, but that's a small fraction of midi2ly's four-second
> runtime, and there are
"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
> On 19 déc. 2012, at 10:18, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Ben Rudiak-Gould writes:
>>
>>> On Windows and OS X, I mean; on Linux and FreeBSD I think you could
>>> just demand installation of the appropriate packages.
>>>
>>> I don't understand what's so unusual abou
James writes:
> Hello
>
> On 19 December 2012 08:11, James wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> author Jean-Charles Malahieude
>> Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:23:13 + (19:23 +0100)
>> committer Jean-Charles Malahieude
>> Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:23:13 + (19:23 +0100)
>> commit 12c6693055728e69dce5c4e5a4a2
On 19 déc. 2012, at 10:18, David Kastrup wrote:
> Ben Rudiak-Gould writes:
>
>> On Windows and OS X, I mean; on Linux and FreeBSD I think you could
>> just demand installation of the appropriate packages.
>>
>> I don't understand what's so unusual about LilyPond's use of Python
>> that it req
Ben Rudiak-Gould writes:
> On Windows and OS X, I mean; on Linux and FreeBSD I think you could
> just demand installation of the appropriate packages.
>
> I don't understand what's so unusual about LilyPond's use of Python
> that it requires a custom build.
Nothing unusual. Neither is there any
James writes:
> On 19 Dec 2012, at 03:28, Colin Campbell wrote:
>
>
> Documentation:
> Issue 3033: Doc: Usage - clarifying the documentation of advanced
> command-line options - R 6938071
> Issue 3004: Web documentation needs updates - R 6949062
> Issue 3028: lyqi link f
Hello
On 19 December 2012 08:11, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> author Jean-Charles Malahieude
> Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:23:13 + (19:23 +0100)
> committer Jean-Charles Malahieude
> Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:23:13 + (19:23 +0100)
> commit 12c6693055728e69dce5c4e5a4a2b5f71180a5e2
>
> Any specifi
Hello,
author Jean-Charles Malahieude
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:23:13 + (19:23 +0100)
committer Jean-Charles Malahieude
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:23:13 + (19:23 +0100)
commit 12c6693055728e69dce5c4e5a4a2b5f71180a5e2
Any specific reason this wasn't
1. Put up for reivew
2. Pushed t
25 matches
Mail list logo
