On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 02:07:19 -0800, m...@mikesolomon.org
wrote:
On 16 févr. 2013, at 21:20, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Best, of course, would be to find and repair the code that cannot handle
zero-widths. We do not yet have the choice between "a bit better" and
"best", merely "a bit better"
On 16 févr. 2013, at 21:20, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
> Best, of course, would be to find and repair the code that cannot handle
> zero-widths. We do not yet have the choice between "a bit better" and
> "best", merely "a bit better" or nothing.
>
One solution is to just allow 0-width buildings
On 2013/02/17 18:57:13, marc wrote:
On 2013/02/17 18:51:23, dak wrote:
> Remove unused variable
LGTM, looks much more scheme-ish than before!
Well, there is not a single set!, there _is_ a named let for building
two lists in tandem (unfold does not work really for building more than
one list
On 2013/02/17 18:51:23, dak wrote:
Remove unused variable
LGTM, looks much more scheme-ish than before!
https://codereview.appspot.com/7350044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-de
Note that the patches marked as fixed but needing verifying can't be verified
at present, since 2.17.13 has not been released.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: James
To: Devel
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 7:43 PM
Subject: PATCH: Countdown to 20130219 - 19:00 G
Thanks for the review.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7319049/diff/2001/lily/dot-column.cc
File lily/dot-column.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7319049/diff/2001/lily/dot-column.cc#newcode63
lily/dot-column.cc:63: vector allowed_y_positions;
On 2013/02/17 08:20:39, Keith wrote:
It w
Marc Hohl writes:
> If this erroneous use of reduce cannot be resolved quickly, it would
> be best to raise an issue for this.
I can't even judge if it is erroneous (namely leading to wrong results),
and that's what makes it a problem.
> Well, a do loop in scheme felt kinda weird, but map didn'
This seems like the most reasonable place to remove extra dots.
Dot_configuration has the job of arranging dots in a chord, but confines
its efforts to the mathematical problem of keeping a set of integer
position for dots close to a set of integer positions of noteheads.
Looking at the resulting
Am 16.02.2013 09:29, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl writes:
Am 15.02.2013 14:02, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com:
Status: Started
Owner: d...@gnu.org
Labels: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
New issue 3182 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: Defuse the obfuscated Scheme
programming contest
http://code.googl
Looks and sounds fine to me.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7300086/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
10 matches
Mail list logo
