This will be nice.
Notice that the Stanza number in
'input/regression/hara-kiri-stanza-number.ly' lost its alignment.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7574048/diff/1/scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm
File scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7574048/diff/1/scm/defin
The most recent patch set copies direction from SlurEvents and
PhrasingSlurEvents, but this doesn't seem to work as intended (it fails
silently). Everything else is operational.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
l
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:36 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Aligning lyrics at a point of time to notecolumns at the same point of time
> should not require associating voices.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> The
https://codereview.appspot.com/7798045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7798045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2247
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2247: @end example
That's \relative wi
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/diff/41001/input/regression/repeat-slur.ly
File input/regression/repeat-slur.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/diff/41001/input/regression/repeat-slur.ly#newcode10
input/regression/repeat-slur.ly:10: "
This should be rather @code{\\breakSlu
Hi,
recently i've mixed several things together and made some mess. I
apologize fo that. Below i explain the situation so that you won't be
lost:
Issue 3239
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3239
https://codereview.appspot.com/7768043
Previous versions of this patch contained s
On 2013/03/18 13:05:15, janek wrote:
On 2013/03/18 10:36:35, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I can't easily test this, but on the basis of the
> reg tests - LGTM
Do you mean that i should improve the test file which is attached to
tracker
issue?
Janek
No, the test file looks fine. It's just th
Reviewers: dak, MikeSol, J_lowe,
Message:
This is the part of Issue 3239 that introduced additional programming
errors. I hope that the explanation is clear.
Of course there is one fundamental question: maybe we shouldn't complain
about grobs with empty extents, and just silently assume that an
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup wrote Monday, March 18, 2013 11:14 AM
>
>> The way to do that is to bind people to their predictions of what can
>> and cannot be achieved in a certain amount of time by agreeing on a
>> timeline in advance and putting in deadlines for certain kinds of
>>
On 2013/03/18 10:36:35, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I can't easily test this, but on the basis of the
reg tests - LGTM
Do you mean that i should improve the test file which is attached to
tracker issue?
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/7564044/
___
l
David Kastrup wrote Monday, March 18, 2013 11:14 AM
> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
>> David Kastrup Monday, March 18, 2013 8:52 AM
>>>
>>> It turns out that the pent-up pressure to get forward-looking changes
>>> into the master branch that have transitory user interfaces or extensive
>>> chang
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup Monday, March 18, 2013 8:52 AM
>>
>> It turns out that the pent-up pressure to get forward-looking changes
>> into the master branch that have transitory user interfaces or extensive
>> changes of internals not exposed to sufficient testing is already too
I can't easily test this, but on the basis of the
reg tests - LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/7564044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
David Kastrup Monday, March 18, 2013 8:52 AM
>
> It turns out that the pent-up pressure to get forward-looking changes
> into the master branch that have transitory user interfaces or extensive
> changes of internals not exposed to sufficient testing is already too
> high to permit a prerelease p
On 03/17/2013 06:47 PM, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
> And while above the staff dynamic brackets have the hook down.
As I said before, I'd have argued for that feature even in the absence of a
Ferneyhough example, as it makes musical/notational sense. But I think the
example settles it.
David,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> In the last week it has become abundantly clear that the last-minute
> attempt for reaching the conditions suitable for making a stable release
> occured too late to arrive at a releasable state.
> []
> So a release process of 2
In the last week it has become abundantly clear that the last-minute
attempt for reaching the conditions suitable for making a stable release
occured too late to arrive at a releasable state.
The work I scheduled for myself for arriving at such a state consisted
in dealing with several regression
Whoah, Mike! I've understood your patch in first reading! Nice commit
message.
The spacing of system-star-text-interface implementing grobs used side
typo (system-start-text)
Also, we change the name of the list of elements used for alignment,
as elements should only be used for axis groups
18 matches
Mail list logo
