LGTM, with minor nits. Thanks for the patch!
https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/15001/input/regression/chord-dots.ly
File input/regression/chord-dots.ly (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/15001/input/regression/chord-dots.ly#oldcode21
input/regression/chord-dots.ly:21
LGTM. Do we have a regtest for this?
https://codereview.appspot.com/8508043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Werner LEMBERG"
To: "janek lilypond"
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 4:07:35 AM
Subject: Re: suggestion: change OctavateEight name to ClefTransposition -
opinions?
> My friend suggests ClefPitchModifier - what'd you think?
Sou
> My friend suggests ClefPitchModifier - what'd you think?
Sounds good.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
1) A small error in Documentationo/learning/tweaks.itely:
@node The force-hshift property
@unnumberedsubsubsec The @code{force-hshift property}
It should be:
The @code{force-hshift} property
2) http://www.lilypond.org/productions.html
A critical edition of Tommaso Traetta’s *Enea nel Lazio (176
Hi Keith,
On 2013/04/04 06:48:22, Keith wrote:
I'll write a commit message, just so Janek can review the patch:
Break slurs between alternative endings in repeats; issue 1698.
Create new event-types BreakPhrasingSlurEvent BreakSlurEvent,
and a music-function \free \( so that users can crea
Hi all,
2013/4/6 Janek Warchoł :
> i think that its essential for us to first have a voice chat
> about all the problems that we're currently having. I believe that
> our problems cannot be effectively solved by mailing list discussions.
>
> What do you think and when do you have time?
I got 0 r
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "pls"
Cc: "LilyPond Developmet Team"
Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2013 9:47:52 PM
Subject: Re: suggestion: change OctavateEight name to ClefTransposition -
opinions?
2013/4/7 pls :
>
>> I think I'd like ClefModifier.
>
> I'd prefer ClefOct
2013/4/7 pls :
>
>> I think I'd like ClefModifier.
>
> I'd prefer ClefOctavation (or maybe ClefOctaveShift) to ClefModifier
> because it's clearer / more intuitive (at least to me). ClefModifier
> could be misunderstood to refer to the shape of the symbol.
In a way it is altering the symbol - by
The section at 1.5.2 on Single-staff polyphony
forms a unified whole and needs to remain as it is.
However, I'd be happy to see the first paragraph
of the patch inserted at the end of Divisi lyrics
in 2.1.2 followed by a reference to the appropriate
section in 1.5.2. It is important that informat
Hi,
i'm resurrecting Busy Developer's summaries, which are intended to
keep busy developers informed about status of development without
having to read whole -devel.
We're currently thinking hard about how to make a stable release
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-04/msg00078
2013/4/5 Janek Warchoł :
> that there are at least *four* engraving mistakes in one of examples
> featured on our website?
> http://www.lilypond.org/ly-examples/bach-bwv610.png
This is now http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3298
(i'm leaving this in half-finished state because i do
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2013/4/7 Ian Hulin :
>
>> The only numbers that make sense above or below clefs are ones
>> referring to a whole number of octaves (8, 15 etc.)
>
> I know at least one piece using a \clef "G_5"
>
> "Chiton"
> Uroš Roijko
> Verlag Neue Musik, Berlin
> NM 852
>
> It's a piec
2013/4/7 Ian Hulin :
> The only numbers that make sense above or below clefs are ones
> referring to a whole number of octaves (8, 15 etc.)
I know at least one piece using a \clef "G_5"
"Chiton"
Uroš Roijko
Verlag Neue Musik, Berlin
NM 852
It's a piece for Solo-Guitar using a three staves layo
Le 06/04/2013 14:14, Reinhold Kainhofer disait :
Dear all,
[...]
I wish you all the best. LilyPond is an awesome project, and it was a
lot of fun to be part of if. But I simply don't have the time any more
to work on it. I will keep working with it (after all, my SO is a cello
teacher...) and hop
Thanks for all your input and work! I hope we'll see you become as
productive or more in your new endeavours.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Dear all,
> As you might have noticed, I got quiet a while ago. The main reasons were
> that I have recently startet at a new
2013/4/7 Ian Hulin :
>
>> I'd prefer ClefOctavation (or maybe ClefOctaveShift) to
>> ClefModifier because it's clearer / more intuitive (at least to
>> me). ClefModifier could be misunderstood to refer to the shape of
>> the symbol.
>
> 1+
> The only numbers that make sense above or below clefs ar
Hi All
On 07/04/13 10:00, pls wrote:
>
> Am 07.04.2013 um 10:14 schrieb Marc Hohl :
>
>> Am 06.04.2013 23:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Marc Hohl writes:
>>>
Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> Hi,
>
> The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it
> doesn
pls writes:
> Am 07.04.2013 um 10:14 schrieb Marc Hohl :
>
>> Am 06.04.2013 23:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Marc Hohl writes:
>>>
Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> Hi,
>
> The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that
> this grob is r
Am 07.04.2013 um 10:14 schrieb Marc Hohl :
> Am 06.04.2013 23:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Marc Hohl writes:
>>
>>> Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that
this grob is related to the clef, and
Am 06.04.2013 23:44, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl writes:
Am 05.04.2013 23:02, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi,
The name "OctavateEight" doesn't have any sense - it doesn't show that
this grob is related to the clef, and anyway the clef can be
"transposed" by any amount, not just an octave.
I
Patch set 2 looks promising, but in view of the
imminence of next stable and the subtlety of the
effect of this patch it is probably best left to
the start of a new development release, as Keith
hints.
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/
__
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/7974046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
23 matches
Mail list logo