LGTM, but one patch too much :-)
https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/19001/ly/titling-init.ly
File ly/titling-init.ly (left):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/19001/ly/titling-init.ly#oldcode144
ly/titling-init.ly:144:
Oops! Changes to this file probably don't belong to
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/8509043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/8474044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/8412044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/7798045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
Dear Reinhold,
I wish you all the best. LilyPond is an awesome project, and it was a
lot of fun to be part of if. But I simply don't have the time any more
to work on it.
Good for you. Thanks a lot for all your efforts!
See you around, or not,
Greetings,
Jan
--
Hi Reinhold,
Congratulations on the your new job. :-)
You'll be missed here in the Pond, here's hoping you'll have time in
the future to dive back in again.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Dear Reinhold,
Congratulations. These words from Ian pretty much express the same I'd
want to say. Good luck!
2013/4/9 Ian Hulin i...@hulin.org.uk:
Hi Reinhold,
Congratulations on the your new job. :-)
You'll be missed here in the Pond, here's hoping you'll have time in
the future to dive
On 2013/03/26 04:10:38, mike7 wrote:
On 25 mars 2013, at 07:10, mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Please do just one manual review of the regression suite between
versions before adding another test of this length.
I wanted to exhaust as many possibilities as I could think of (broken
slurs
Changed as suggested.
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/8384043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/vocal.itely
File Documentation/notation/vocal.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8384043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/vocal.itely#newcode1632
Documentation/notation/vocal.itely:1632:
A couple of minor suggestions, otherwise LGTM
Thanks, Janek!
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/8384043/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/vocal.itely
File Documentation/notation/vocal.itely (right):
done.
https://codereview.appspot.com/8384043/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/vocal.itely
File Documentation/notation/vocal.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8384043/diff/10001/Documentation/notation/vocal.itely#newcode1632
Documentation/notation/vocal.itely:1632: cadence, or a
On 9 avr. 2013, at 20:31, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
On 2013/03/26 04:10:38, mike7 wrote:
On 25 mars 2013, at 07:10, mailto:k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Please do just one manual review of the regression suite between
versions before adding another test of this length.
I wanted to
fails make
https://codereview.appspot.com/8384043/diff/15001/Documentation/notation/vocal.itely
File Documentation/notation/vocal.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/8384043/diff/15001/Documentation/notation/vocal.itely#newcode1641
Documentation/notation/vocal.itely:1641:
You changed more than necessary to fix the reported bug. This is good
because finally voiced r1-style whole rests are in the correct positions
(which I confirmed with Ted Ross' book just to be careful).
Quarter-rests and shorter look a bit odd now, on the even-line-count
staves, as they are not
15 matches
Mail list logo
